Skip to main content
Log in

Analogy of a Linear Chain and Seismic Vibrations of Segmental and Viscoelastic Pipelines

  • Published:
Mechanics of Solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the problem of seismic vibrations of a segmental pipeline with damping joints, deformed by the law of linear viscoelasticity, an original analogy with a linear chain of concentrated masses was put forward. The constructed discrete system generalizes the monatomic lattice model in the sense that the viscoelastic interaction between the masses of the chain is considered and, moreover, the forced (and not own) oscillations of such a system are investigated. By the transition from a discrete system to a continuous one, the integro-differential oscillation equation of a segmented pipeline with viscoelastic joints in an elastically resisting medium is obtained. This equation is a generalization of the well-known Klein–Gordon differential equation describing the “constrained” vibrations of an elastic rod or string in a medium with elastic resistance. In addition, the equation gives the problem of seismic vibrations of a continuous pipeline from a polymer (viscoelastic) material.

Joint stationary seismic vibrations of a viscoelastic pipeline and soil were studied in an exact formulation and maximum stresses in the pipeline were found by solving the resulting integro-differential equation. The same stresses were found using the “hard pinch” engineering approach, according to which displacements and deformations in the seismic wave and pipeline are the same. By analyzing the stresses found under the viscoelasticity law in the form of the Kelvin–Voigt model relationship, it is established that the generally accepted position that the engineering approach gives an upper estimate for the stresses in the pipeline is valid only in the subsonic case (when the seismic wave velocity is lower than the wave velocity in the pipeline) and is not valid in the supersonic mode, when the exact theory can lead to stresses exceeding those calculated on the basis of the engineering approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. J. O’Rourke and X. Liu, Response of Buried Pipelines Subject to Earthquake Effects (Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Buffalo, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Sh. Israilov, “An Analogy of Linear Atom Chains in Seismodynamics of Underground Pipelines,” Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh., No. 1, 69–72 (2015) [Moscow Univ. Mech. Bull. (Engl. Transl.) 70 (1), 19–21 (2015)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. C. Eringen, Mechanics of Continua (JohnWiley&Sons, New York, 1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, Leningrad, 1963) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Brillouin and M. Parodi, Propagation des Ondes dans les Milieux Périodiques (Masson, Paris, 1956; Izdat. Inostr. Liter.,Moscow, 1959).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Omori, “Seismic Experiments on the Fracturing and Overturning of Columns,” Publication of the Earthquake Investigation Committee in Foreign Languages. No. 4, 69–141 (1900).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sh. G. Napetvaridze, Seismic Resistance of Hydraulic Structures (Gosstroyizdat, Moscow, 1959) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. H. Newmark, “Problems in Wave Propagation in Soil and Rock,” in Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials (Univ. of New Mexico Press, New Mexico, 1968), pp. 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Standards for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants: NP 031–01. Appendix 6. The Main Provisions of the Calculation of Linearly Extended Structures (Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

  10. D. V. Georgievskii and M. Sh. Israilov, “Seismodynamics of Extended Underground Structures and Soils: Statement of the Problem and Self-Similar Solutions,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 4, 138–151 (2015) [Mech. Solids. (Engl. Transl.) 50 (4), 473–484 (2015)].

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sh. Israilov, “Coupled Seismic Vibrations of a Pipeline in an Infinite Elastic Medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk.Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 1, 57–66 (2016) [Mech. Solids. (Engl. Transl.) 51 (1), 46–53 (2016)].

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. B. Prasad, Fundamentals of SoilDynamics and Earthquake Engineering (PHI Learning,Delhi, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Gray (Editor), American Institute of Physics Handbook, 2-d ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Sh. Israilov, “Seismodynamics of the Underground Pipeline,” Probl. Mekh. AN RUz. No. 3, 18–24 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Sh. Israilov, “Related Problems of Pipeline Seismodynamics,” VestnikMoskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh., No. 5, 41–45 (1996).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sh. Israilov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.Sh. Israilov, 2018, published in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Mekhanika Tverdogo Tela, 2018, No. 3, pp. 119–128.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Israilov, M.S. Analogy of a Linear Chain and Seismic Vibrations of Segmental and Viscoelastic Pipelines. Mech. Solids 53, 340–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654418070129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654418070129

Keywords

Navigation