Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determination of the material fracture toughness by numerical analysis of 3D elastoplastic dynamic deformation

  • Published:
Mechanics of Solids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a technique for calculating the plastic strain and fracture toughness fields of a material by solving dynamical 3D problems of determining the stress-strain state in the elastoplastic statement with possible unloading of the material taken into account. The numerical solution was obtained by a finite difference scheme applied to the three-point shock bending tests of parallelepiped-shaped bars made of different materials with plane crack-notches in the middle. The fracture toughness coefficient was determined for reactor steel. The numerically calculated stress tensor components, mean stresses, the Odquist parameter characterizing the accumulated plastic strain, and the fracture toughness are illustrated by graphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. L. Medvedskii and D. V. Tarlakovskii, “Nonstationary Contact between a Nondeformable Punch with Imperfections and an Elastic Half-Plane on the Segment of Supersonic Penetration,” Vestnik MAI 18 (6), 125–132 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. D. Kubenko, V. V. Gavrilenko, and D. V. Tarlakovskii, “Action of Nonstationary Load on the Surface of an Elastic Strip,” Dopov. Nat. Akad. Nauk Kiev, No. 1, 59–65 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Weisbrod and D. Rittel, “AMethod for Dynamic Fracture Toughness Determination Using Short Beams,” Int. J. Fract. 104, 89–103 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. V. Nemirovskii and T. P. Romanova, “Dynamic Resistance of Plane Plastic Obstacles,” (Geo, Novosibirsk, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Kharchenko, E. A. Kondryakov, and A. V. Panasenko, “Specific Characteristics of Crack Propagation in Steels in Tests with Charpy Samples and Disk Samples,” VANT. Kharkov, No. 2 (84), 31–38 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. R. Bogdanov and G. T. Sulim, “Plain Deformation of Elastoplastic Material with Profile Shaped as a Compact Specimen (Dynamic Loading),” Izv. Akad.Nauk.Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 3, 111–120 (2013) [Mech. Solids (Engl. Transl.) 48 (3), 329–336 (2013)].

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. R. Bogdanov and G. T. Sulim, “Modeling the Plastic Strain Increase on Impact Based on Numerical Solution of the Plane Stress State Problem,” Vestnik MAI 20 (3), 196–201 (2013).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. V. R. Bogdanov, “Determination of Fracture Viscosity of a Material on the Basis of Numerical Modeling of Plane Deformed State,” Vestnik Kiev Nats. Un-tu. Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 3, 51–56 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. R. Bogdanov and G. T. Sulim, “Evaluation of Crack Resistance Based on the Numerical Modeling of the Plane Strain State,” Fiz. Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 6, 16–24 (2010) [Mater. Sci. (Engl. Transl.) 46 (6), 723–734 (2011)].

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. R. Bogdanov and G. T. Sulim, “Determination of Fracture Viscosity of a Material on the Basis of NumericalModeling of Three-DimensionalDynamic Problem,” in Intern. Sci.-Techn. Collection of Papers “Reliability and Durability of Machines and Constructions”, No. 33, 153–166 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. R. Bogdanov, “Three-Dimensional Dynamic Problem of Plastic Strain and Stress Concentration near the Crack Tips,” Vestnik Kiev Nats. Un-tu. Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 2, 51–56 (2009).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Piskun and Yu. N. Shevchenko, “Dynamic Elastoplastic Processes of Deformation of Bodies of Rotation under Pulse Loading,” in Actual Aspects of Physical-Mechanical Research (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 2007), pp. 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. I. Makhnenko, “Improvement of Methods for Estimation of Residual Life of Welded Joints in Durable Structures,” Avtomatich. Svarka, No. 10–11, 112–121 (2003) [Paton Welding J. (Engl. Transl.), No. 10–11, 107–116 (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Z. Margolin, V. A. Shvetsova, A. G. Gulenko, et al., “Fracture Toughness Predictions for a Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel in the Initial and Highly Embrittled States with the Master Curve Approach and a ProbabilisticModel,” Pressure Vessels and Piping, 219–231 (January 2002).

  15. A. G. Gogotsi, “Fracture Toughness Studies on V-Notched Ceramic Specimens,” Probl. Prochn. No. 1, 120–127 (2000) [Strength ofMaterials (Engl. Transl.) 32 (1), 81–85 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM Standard E399. Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, V.03.1 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1991).

  17. DIN 51 109 Testing of Advanced Technical Ceramics; Determination of Fracture Toughness (Kic) (1991).

  18. ASTMStandard E1921–97. Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature. To the Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, V.03.1, pp. 1068–1084.

  19. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Guide 1.99 (TASKME 305-4). Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials, Revision 2,May 1988/

  20. M. P. Savruk, Fracture Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Vol. 2: Strain Intensity Factors for Cracked Bodies (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Z. Margolin and V. A. Shvetsova, “Brittle Fracture Criterion: Structural Mechanics Approach,” Probl. Prochn., No. 2, 3–16 (1992) [Strength ofMaterials (Engl. Transl.) 24 (2), 115–131 (1992)].

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. L. Zyukina, “Conservative Difference Schemes on Uniform Grids for Two-DimensionalWave Equations,” in Proc. N. I. LobachevskiiMath. Center, Vol. 26 (Kazan, 2004), pp. 151–160 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Transport University, ul. Suvorova 1, Kiev, 01010, Ukraine

    V. R. Bogdanov

  2. Ivan Franko National University of L’viv, ul. Universytetskaya 1, Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

    G. T. Sulim

Authors
  1. V. R. Bogdanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. T. Sulim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. R. Bogdanov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.R. Bogdanov, G.T. Sulim, 2016, published in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Mekhanika Tverdogo Tela, 2016, No. 2, pp. 87–99.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bogdanov, V.R., Sulim, G.T. Determination of the material fracture toughness by numerical analysis of 3D elastoplastic dynamic deformation. Mech. Solids 51, 206–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654416020084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654416020084

Keywords

Search

Navigation