Patterns for constructing scientific citation index

Abstract

This paper presents the structural patterns for the basic types of science citation indexes, including alternative citation indexes of the newest generation. The patterns make allowance for the subtle characteristics of citation indexes. The patterns of citation indexes are universal enough to be used as templates for automatically generating new citation indexes with specified properties when creating intelligent modules of scientometric information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Ioannidis, J.P.A., Boyack, K., and Wouters, P.F., Citation metrics: A primer on how (not) to normalize, PLoS Biol., 2016, vol. 14, no. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ioannidis, J.P.A., Klavans, R., and Boyack, K.W., Multiple citation indicators and their composite across scientific disciplines, PLoS Biol., 2016, vol. 14, no. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kabakova, E.A., The use of science metric indicators in the evaluation of scientific activity, Vopr. Territ. Razvit., 2014, no. 8 (18), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Portenoy, J., Hullman, J., and West, J.D., Leveraging citation networks to visualize scholarly influence over time, arXiv preprint, 2016. arXiv: 1611.07135

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.V., The role of bibliometry in assessing the research activity of science, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 210–251.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tret'yakova, O.V. and Kabakova, E.A., Opportunities and prospects for using citation indexes in assessing the performance of a scientific institution, Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, 2013, no. 6 (30), pp. 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Busygina, T.V., Altmetrics as a complex of new tools for assessing the products of scientific activity, Idei Idealy, 2016, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Galligan, F. and Dyas-Correia, S., Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure, Ser. Rev., 2013, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bornmann, L., Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics, Scientometrics, 2015, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 1123–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K., Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web, Prof. Inf., 2015, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 587–606.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bornmann, L. and Haunschild, R., Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator, J. Inf., 2016, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 875–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    King, C., Research fronts 2016. The hottest areas in science. http://stateofinnovation.com/research-fronts-2016-the-hottest-areas-in-science.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Akoev, M.A., Markusova, V.A., Moskaleva, O.V., and Pislyakov, V.V., A Manual on Scientometrics: Indicators of the Development of Science and Technology, Akoev, M.A., Ed., Yekaterinburg: Izd. Ural. Univ., 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Aleskerov, F.T., Kataeva, E.V., Pislyakov, V.V., and Yakuba, V.I., Evaluation of the contribution of scientific workers by the method of threshold aggregation, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 172–189.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shtovba, S.D. and Shtovba, E.V., Review of scientometric indicators for assessing the publication activity of the scientist, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zemskov, A.I., About some bibliometric indexes, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2016, no. 8, pp. 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tsyganov, A.V., A brief description of scientometric indicators based on citations, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 248–261.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rijcke, S., Wouters, P.F., Rushforth, A.D., Franssen, T.P., and Hammarfelt, B., Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use–a literature review, Res. Eval., 2016, vol. 2, pp. 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shotton, D., CiTO, the citation typing ontology, J. Biomed. Semantics, 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, p. S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Afonin, S.A., Kozitsyn, A.S., and Shachnev, D.A., Use of the ontological representation of the structure of the relational database for the aggregation of scientometric data, Nauchn. Serv. Seti Internet, 2016, pp. 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Kalachikhin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © P.A. Kalachikhin, 2017, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy, 2017, No. 7, pp. 1–10.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalachikhin, P.A. Patterns for constructing scientific citation index. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 51, 171–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105517040021

Download citation

Keywords

  • altmetrics
  • indexes
  • indicators
  • metrics
  • patterns
  • ratings
  • citation
  • expert evaluations