Skip to main content
Log in

Twelve theses on argumentation systems

  • Published:
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics Aims and scope

Abstract

In this article we consider the partition of a set of statements P = P aP bP′, where P a, P b, P′ are, correspondingly, sets of statements only being argumented, both being argumented and argumenting, and only argumenting (basic statements). On P are defined two functions of argument and counter-argument selection forming the semantics for logics of argumentation. A four-valued logic of argumentation is proposed. By means of graph theory are formed trees of arguments (argument trees), wood, consisting of them, and some transformations of the wood, such that their result may be both planar and non-planar graph. Argument systems (systems of arguments) are defined together with their characterizations that use analytic tableaux. With the help of argument trees a specification of the idea of hermeneutic (“vicious”) circle is formalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Benthem, J., Logic and Reasoning: Do the Facts Matter? Studia Logica, 2011, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Logic and Argumentation van Benthem, J., Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., and Veltman, F., Eds., Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vagin, V.N., Golovina, E.Yu., Zagoryanskaya, A.A., and Fomina, M.V., Dostovernyi i pravdopodobnyi vyvod v intellektual’nykh sistemakh (Reliable and Plausible Inference in Intelligent Systems), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Finn, V.K., Standard and Non-Standard Logics of Argumentation, in Iskusstvennyi intellekt: metodologiya primeneniya, filosofiya (Artificial Intelligence: Methodology and Applications, Philosophy), Moscow: KRASAND, 2011, pp. 312–338.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Finn, V.K., On One Variant of Argumentation Logic, Nauchn.-Techn. Inform., Ser. 2, 1996, no. 5–6, pp. 3–19.

  6. Wang, H., Logic, Computers, and Sets. Cp. XII. Many-Sorted Predicate Calculi, New York: Chelsea, 1970, pp. 322–333.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Konig, D., Sur les correspondences multivoques des ensembles, Fundamenta Math., 1926, no. 8, pp. 114–134.

  8. Gadamer, H.-G., Truth and Method New York: The Seabury, 1975; Moscow: Progress, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harary, F., Graph Theory Addison-Wesley, 1969; Moscow: Mir, 1973.

  10. Finn, V.K. and Mikheyenkova, M.A., Plausible Reasoning for the Problems of Cognitive Sociology, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2011, vol. 20, pp. 113–139.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. K. Finn.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.K. Finn, 2012, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2, 2012, No. 11, pp. 20–30.

The article was translated by Prof. D.G. Lakhuti. From the translator: in their article on Developments in Argumentation Theory (Logic and Argumentation, eds. J. van Benthem, F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst and F. Veltman, North Holland, Amsterdam/Oxford/New York/Tokio, 1996, pp. 9–26) Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst single out four different meanings of the English word argument: (a) a reason, (b) a logical inference of a conclusion from one or more premises, (c) discussion, and (d) a quarrel (p. 9). In Russian there is no word with the same four meanings. In this translation the word argument is used in the sence (a), the word argumentation in the sense (b); we will not need the meanings (c) or, thank God, (d). The verb to argument will be used as meaning to find arguments (in support of a statement), or to build an argumentation.—D. L.

About this article

Cite this article

Finn, V.K. Twelve theses on argumentation systems. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 46, 235–247 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105512060039

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105512060039

Keywords

Navigation