Abstract
The process of development of approaches to the qualitative analysis of social data from a qualitative analysis of the use of computer tools is reviewed in this paper. Its development means a transfer from simple computer processing of data to modern intellectual data analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yadov, V.A., Strategiya sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya (Strategy of Social Research), Moscow: Dobrosvet, 2003.
Mill’, D.S., Sistema logiki sillogisticheskoi i induktivnoi (System of Syllogistic and Inductive Logic), Moscow: LENAND, 2011.
Dyurkgeim, E., Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie (Sociology. Its Subject, Method, and Purpose), Moscow: Kanon, 1995.
Tatarova, G.G., Metodologiya analiza dannykh v sotsiologii (Methodology of Data and Sociology Analysis), Moscow: Strategiya, 1998.
Batygin, G.S., Lektsii po metodologii sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii (Lectures on Methodology of Social Researches), Moscow: RUDN, 2008.
Kryshtanovskii, A.O., Analiz sotsiologicheskikh dannykh (Social Data Mining), Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom GU VShE, 2006.
Devyatko, I.F., Metody sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya (Social Research Methods), Moscow: KDU, 2003.
Veber, M., Izbrannoe: protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma (Selectas: Protestant Ethic and Capitalism Spirit), Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2006.
Shils, E.A., Foreword, Weber, M., The Methodology of the Social Sciences, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1949.
Sorokin, P., Quantophrenny, in Sotsiologiya: Khrestomatiya dlya vuzov (Sociology: Reading-Book for Higher Education Institutions), comp. by Kravchenko A.I.), Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002.
Guts, A.K. and Frolova, Yu.V., Matematicheskie metody v sotsiologii (Mathematical Methods in Sociology), Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2007.
Tolstova, Yu.N. and Maslennikov, E.V., Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Empirical Research as Measurement in a General Sense, Soc. Res., 2000, no. 9, pp. 101–109.
Samylovskii, A.I., About Mathematics of Behavior Research, in Matematicheskoe modelirovanie sotsial’nykh protsessov (Mathematical Modeling of Social Processes), Moscow: KD Univ., 2009.
Gotlib, A.S., Vvedenie v sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie (Kachestvennyi i kolichestvennyi podkhody) (Introduction to Social Research (Qualitative and Quantitative Approches)), Moscow: Flinta, 2005.
Vrigt, G.Kh., fon., Explanation and understanding, in Logiko-filosofskie issledovaniya (Logic-Philosophic Researches), Moscow: Progress, 1986, pp. 35–241.
Gobo, G., The Renaissance of Qualitative Methods, FQS Forum: Qual. Soc. Res., 2005, vol. 6, no. 3, ch. 42.
Popper, K., Logic of Social Sciences, in Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya i logika sotsial’nykh nauk (Evolutionary Epistemology and Logic of Social Sciences), Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2000.
Parsons, T.O., O strukture sotsial’nogo deistviya (About the Structure of Social Effect), Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
Strauss, A. and Korbin, Dzh., Osnovy Kachestvennogo issledovaniya. Obosnovannaya teoriya. Protsedury i tekhniki (Bases of the Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory. Procedures and Techniques), Moscow: KomKniga, 2007.
Kanygin, G.V., Context-Aimed Conceptualization of Research Concepts, Soc. J., 2007, no. 3, pp. 60–80.
Kelle, U., “Emergence” vs. “Forcing” of Empirical Data? A Crucial Problems of “Grounded Theory” Reconsidered, FQS Forum: Qual. Soc. Res., 2005, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 27.
Glaser, B., Emergence Vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Mill Valley: Soc. Press, 1992.
Kempbell, D., Qualitative Knowledge in Researched Effects, in Modeli Eksperimentov v Sotsial’noi Psikhologii i Prikladnykh Issledovaniyakh (Models of Experiments in Social Psychology and Applied Researches), Moscow: Progress, 1980.
Shteinberg, I., Shanin, T., Kovalev, E., and Levinson, A., Kachestvennye metody. Polevye sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Qualitative Methods. Field Social Researches), St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2009.
Hesse-Biber, S.N., Mixed Method Research: Merging Theory with Practice, New York: The Guilford Press, 2010.
Kelle, U., Sociological Explanations Between Micro and Macro and the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, FQS Forum: Qualitative Soc. Res., 2001, vol. 2, no. 1, ch. 5.
Bazeley, P., Issues in Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches To Research, in Applying Qualitative Methods To Marketing Management Research, Buber, R., Gadner, J. and Richards, L., Eds., UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, pp. 141–156.
Smelzer, N.Dzh., On Comparative Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Internationalization in Sociology, Soc. Res., 2004, no. 11, pp. 3–12.
Davydov, A.A., Fatal Error of Sociology. http://ecsocman.edu.ru/rubezh/msg/28973359.html.
Batygin, G.S. and Devyatko, I.F., Myth on Qualitative Sociology, Soc. J., 1994, no. 2, pp. 28–42.
Frost, N., Nolas, S.-M., Brooks-Gordon, B., et al., Pluralism in Qualitative Research: the Impact of Different Researchers and Qualitative Approaches on the Analysis of Qualitative Data, Qual. Res., 2010, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–20.
Kelle, U., An Overview of Computer-Aided Methods in Qualitative Research, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle, U., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 1–18.
Fielding, N.G., Automating the Ineffable: Qualitative Software and the Meaning of Qualitative Research, in Qualitative Research in Action, May, T., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 2003, pp. 161–178.
Kelle, U. and Laurie, H., Computer Use in Qualitative Research and Issues of Validity, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle. U., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 19–28.
Anderson-Gough, F., Using Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Respecting Voices within Data Management and Analysis, in The Real Life Guide To Accounting Research: A Behind-The-Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, Humphrey, C. and Lee, B., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004, pp. 373–400.
Lewins, A. and Silver, C., Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step by Step Guide, London: Sage Publications, 2007.
Berger, R., Review: “Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-By-Step Guide” (Lewins & Silver 2007), Forum: Qualitative Soc. Res., 2009, vol. 10, no. 1, ch. 23.
Hesse-Biber, S.N. and Dupuis, P., Hypothesis Testing in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle, U., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 129–135.
Shelly, A. and Sibert, E., Using Logic Programming to Facilitate Qualitative Data Analysis, Qual. Soc., 1986, vol. 9, no.2, pp. 145–161.
Sibert, E. and Shelly, A., Logic Programming for Hypothesis Generation and Refinement, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle, U., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 113–128.
Huber, G.L. and García, C.M., Computer Assistance for Testing Hypotheses About Qualitative Data: The Software Package AQUAD, Qual. Soc., 1991, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 325–347.
Huber, G.L., Qualitative Hypothesis Examination and Theory Building, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle, U., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 136-150.
Fielding, N.G. and Cisneros-Puebla, C.A., CAQDAS-GIS Convergence Toward a New Integrated Mixed Method Research Practice? J. Mixed Methods Res., 2009, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 349–370.
De Gregorio, E. and Arcidiacono, F., Computer-Assisted Analysis in the Social Sciences: A Unique Strategy for Mixed Research? Int. J. Multiple Res. Approaches, 2008, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–35.
García-Alvarez, E. and Lóez-Sintas, J., Contingency Table: A Two-Way Bridge Between Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, Field Methods, 2002, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 270–287.
Kuckartz U., Realizing Mixed-Methods Approaches with MAXQDA. www.methoden-evaluation.de.
Kuckartz, U., Case-Oriented Quantification, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle, U., Ed., London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 158–166.
Humble, A.M., Technique Triangulation for Validation in Directed Content Analysis, Int. J. Qual. Methods, 2009, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 34–51.
Brent, E. and Slusarz, P., “Feeling the Beat”: Intelligent Coding Advice from Metaknowledge in Qualitative Research, Soc. Sci. Comp. Rev., 2003, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 281–303.
Cisneros-Puebla C.A. Qualitative Computing. www.paginasprodigy.com/cesarcisne/compartidos/QualitativeComputing.pdf.
Lonkila, M., Grounded Theory As an Emerging Paradigm for Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis, in Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kelle, U., Ed. London: Sage Publication, 1998, pp. 41–51.
Bringer, J.D., Johnston, L.H., and Brackenridge, C.H., Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software To Develop a Grounded Theory Project, Field Methods, 2006, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 245–266.
Lu Chi-Jung and Shulman S.W., Rigor and Flexibility in Computer-based Qualitative Research: Introducing the Coding Analysis Toolkit, Int. J. Mutl. Res. Approaches, 2008, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 105–117.
Ganter, B. and Wille, R., Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations, Berlin: Springer, 1999.
Freeman, L.C., Cliques, Galois Lattices, and the Structure of Human Social Groups, Soc. Networks, 1996, no. 18, pp. 173–187.
Ragin, C.C., The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1987.
Heise, D., Event Structure Analysis: a Qualitative Model of Quantitative Research, in Using Computers in Qualitative Research, Fielding, N. and Lee, R., Eds., CA: Sage, 1993, pp. 136–163.
Griffin, L., Historic Sociology, Narrative and Event Structure Analysis Fifteen Years Later, Soc. Res., 2010, no. 2, pp. 131–140.
Lewins, A. and Silver, C., Choosing a CAQDAS Package. http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/PDF/2009ChoosingsCAQDASPackage.pdf.
Kanygin, G.V., Instrumental Means and Methodological principles of Social Data Mining, Soc.: 4M, 2007, no. 25, pp. 70–98.
Baugh, J.B., Hallcom, A.S., and Harris, M.E., Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software: a Practical Perspective for Applied Research, Revista Del Instituto Internacional De Costos, 2010, no. 6, pp. 69–81.
Romme, A. and Georges, L., Boolean Comparative Analysis of Qualitative Data, Qual. and Quant., 1995, vol. 29, pp. 317–329.
Rihoux, B., Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques: Recent Advances and Challenges, in Metoden Der Vergleichenden Politik-Und Sozialwissen-Schaft. Neue Entwicklungen Und Anwendungen, Pickel, S., Pickel, G., Lauth, H.-J., and Jahn, D., Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2009, pp. 365–385.
Smelser, N.J., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1976.
Rihoux, B. and De Meur, G., Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Configurational Comparative Methods, in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Applied Social Research Methods), Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C., Eds., London: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 33–68.
Yablonskii, S.V., Vvedenie v Diskretnuyu Matematiku (Introduction to Discrete Mathematics), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.
Cronqvist, L. and Berg-Schlosser, D., Multi-Value QCA, Configurational Comparative Methods, in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Applied Social Research Methods), Rihoux B. and Ragin, C.C., Eds., London: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 69–86.
Ragin, C.C., Fuzzy-Set Social Science, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2000.
Ragin, C.C., Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets, Configurational Comparative Methods, in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Applied Social Research Methods), Rihoux B. and Ragin, C.C., Eds., London: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 87–122.
Berg-Schlosser, D., Comparative Research Design: Case and Variable Selection, Configurational Comparative Methods, in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Applied Social Research Methods), Rihoux B. and Ragin, C.C., Eds., London: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 19–32.
De Meur, G., Bursness, P., and Gottcheiner, A., MSDO/MDSO Revisited for Public Policy Analysis, in Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis. Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide, Rihoux, B. and Grimm, H., Eds., New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 67–94.
De Meur, G. and Gottcheiner, A., The Logic and Assumptions of MDSO-MSDO Designs, in The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, Byrne, D. and Ragin, C.C., Eds., London: Sage Publication, 2009, pp. 208–221.
Mahoney, J. and Goertz, G., The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research, Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev., 2004, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 653–669.
Caren, N. and Panofsky, A., A Technique for Adding Temporality To Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Soc. Methods and Res., 2005, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 147–172.
Ragin, C.C. and Rihoux, B., Replies To Commentators: Reassurances and Rebuttals, Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 2004, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 21–24.
Tolstova, Yu.N., Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis: Organic Unity or Independence, Soc. Res., 2004, no. 9, pp. 12–14.
Orlov, A.I., Statistical Methods in the Russian Sociology (Thirty Years Later), Soc.: 4M, 2005, no. 20, pp. 32–53.
Davydov, A.A., Konkurentnye preimushchestva sistemnoi sotsiologii (Competitive Advantages of Systemic Sociology), Moscow: IS RAN, 2008.
Matematicheskie metody v sotsial’nykh naukakh: sb. statei (Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences: Collected Works) Lazarsfel’d, P.K. and Genri, N., Eds., Moscow: Progress, 1973.
Matematicheskoe modelirovanie sotsial’nykh protsessov (Mathematical Models of Social Processes), Mikhailov, A.I., Ed., Moscow: Knizhnyi dom “Universitet”, 1998–2010.
Chubukova, I.A. Data Mining, Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom “Binom”, 2008.
Chesnokov, S.V., Determinatsionnyi analiz sotsial’noekonomicheskikh dannykh, 2-e izd (Determination Analysis of Socioeconomic Data, 2nd Ver.), Moscow: URSS, 2009.
Davydov, A., Comments to the Memorandum, IV Conference in Memoriam of Kryshtanovskii A.O. “Modern Problems of Formation of the Method Inventory of the Sociologist”. http://www.ssa-rss.ru/index.php?page-id=273.
Ostrovskii, A.M., On Computer technologies of Search of Empirical Regiarities in Databases, Soc.: 4M, 2008, no. 27, pp. 140–157.
Encyclopedia Britannica. www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1056150/data-mining/.
Fayyad, U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. and Smyth, P., From Data Mining To Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AI Mag., 1996, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 37–54.
Arskii, Yu.M. and Finn, V.K., Principles of Constructing f Intelligent Systems, Inf. Tekhnol. Vychisl. Syst., 2008, no. 4, pp. 4–36.
Popper, K., Evolutionary Epistemology, in Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya i logika sotsial’nykh nauk (Evolutionary Epistemology and Logic of Social Sciences), Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2000, pp. 57–74.
Finn, V.K., Reliable Reasoning in Intelligent Systems of DSM Type, in Avtomaticheskoe porozhdenie gipotez v intellektual’nykh sistemakh (Automatic Generation of Hypotheses in Intellectual Systems), Finn, V.K., Ed., Moscow: Knizhnyi dom “Librokom”, 2009, pp. 10–48; Itogi nauki i tekhniki (Results of Science and Technique), Moscow: VINITI, 1991, vol. 15, pp. 54–101.
Avtomaticheskoe porozhdenie gipotez v intellektual’nykh sistemakh (Automatic Generation of Hypotheses in Intelligent Systems), Finn, V.K., Ed., Moscow: Knizhnyi dom “Librokom”, 2009, part 3, pp. 409–491.
Finn, V.K., Synthesis of Cognitive Procedures and Induction Problem, in Avtomaticheskoe porozhdenie gipotez v intellektual’nykh sistemakh (Automatic Generation of Hypotheses in Intelligent Systems), Finn, V.K., Ed., Moscow: Knizhnyi Dom “Librokom”, 2009, pp. 92–158; Nauchno-Tech. Inf., Ser. 2, 1999, nos. 1–2, pp. 8–45. (Reprinted in Nauchno-Tech. Inf., Ser. 2, 2009, no. 6, pp. 1–37.)
Parsons, T.O., Theories and Metatheories, in Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya. Antologiya (Theoretical Sociology. Anthology), Moscow: Nauka, 2002.
Mikheenkova, M.A., On Principles of Formalized Qualitative Social Data Mining, Inf. Tekhnol. Vychislit. Syst., 2009, no. 4, pp. 40–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © M.A. Mikheenkova, 2011, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2, 2011, No. 8, pp. 1–21.
About this article
Cite this article
Mikheenkova, M.A. Computer-support capabilities for qualitative research in sociology. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 45, 180–201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105511040078
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105511040078