Abstract
The article presents the results of measurements with the help of the experimental unit designed for measuring in-vivo characteristics of photoelectric- and photoelectric-thermal converters based on copper–indium–gallium–selenide (CIGS) panels. It is found that the effect of ambient temperature on the electrical efficiency during the day is more pronounced compared to the density of solar radiation and the wind speed and that, even without constant heat removal. The contact of the rear surface of the solar panel with heat-absorbing/accumulating medium prevents a 10% reduction in the electrical efficiency even in the cooler time of the year.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Green, M.A., Dunlop, E.D., Levi, D.H., et al., Solar cell efficiency tables (version 54), Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., 2019, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3171
Clemens Heske, M.H.R., Lincot, D., Powalla, M., et al., CIGS White Paper 2019. https://www.zsw-bw.de/uploads/media/CIGS_White_Paper_2019_online.pdf.
LAZARD, Lazard’s levelized cost of energy analysis – version 13.0, 2019. https://www.lazard.com/media/451086/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-130-vf.pdf.
Stamford, L. and Azapagic, A., Environmental impacts of copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) photovoltaics and the elimination of cadmium through atomic layer deposition, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, vol. 688, pp. 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.343
Padoan, F.C.S.M., Altimari, P., and Pagnanelli, F., Recycling of end of life photovoltaic panels: A chemical prospective on process development, Sol. Energy, 2019, vol. 177, pp. 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.003
Gulkowski, S., Zdyb, A., and Dragan, P., Experimental efficiency analysis of a photovoltaic system with different module technologies under temperate climate conditions, Appl. Sci., 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010141
Mussard, M. and Amara, M., Performance of solar photovoltaic modules under arid climatic conditions: A review, Sol. Energy, 2018, vol. 174, pp. 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.071
Ramanathan, K., et al., Properties of 19.2% efficiency ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 thin-film solar cells, Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., 2003, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.494
Reinhard, P., et al., Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells and modules—a boost in efficiency due to potassium, IEEE J. Photovoltaics, 2015, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2377516
Guillemoles, J., The puzzle of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells stability, Thin Solid Films, 2002, vols. 403–404, pp. 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01519-X
Ramanujam, J. and Singh, U.P., Copper indium gallium selenide based solar cells – a review, Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1306–1319. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE00826K
Nakamura, M., Yamaguchi, K., Kimoto, Y., et al., Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%, IEEE J. Photovoltaics, 2019, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1863–1867. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218
Komilov, A., Installation for determining the energy indicators of the area, FAP 01405, 2019.
Davronov, Sh.R., Autonomous multifunctional measuring device for monitoring the characteristics of photovoltaic modules, Appl. Sol. Energy, 2020, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 118–124. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X2002005X
Funding
This study was conducted without any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by S. Kuznetsov
About this article
Cite this article
Komilov, A.G., Nasrullaev, Y.Z. Influence of the Environment on the Parameters of CIGS-Based Photovoltaic and Photovoltaic-Thermal Converters Used in Real Conditions. Appl. Sol. Energy 57, 8–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X21010047
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X21010047