Advertisement

Applied Solar Energy

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 258–266 | Cite as

Correlation between central receiver size and solar field using flat heliostats

  • V. Venkatesh
  • Badri S. Rao
  • Gopalakrishnan Srilakshmi
  • N. C. Thirumalai
  • M. A. Ramaswamy
Solar Energy Concentrators

Abstract

In Central Receiver Systems (CRSs), thousands of heliostats track the sunrays and reflect beam radiation on to a receiver surface. The size of the reflected image and the extent of reflection from the heliostats are one of the important criteria that need to be taken into account while designing a receiver, since spillage losses may vary from 2 to 16% of the total losses. The present study aims to determine the size of an external cylindrical receiver, such that the rays reflected from all the heliostats in the field are intercepted. A dimensionless correlation with respect to tower height and receiver size (diameter and height) as a function of heliostat size and its position is discussed in the paper. This correlation could be used as a first-order approximation to estimate the receiver dimensions. When applied to the Ivanpah Solar Electricity Generating Station (ISEGS) plant, the correlation yields satisfactory estimation of receiver dimensions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zakhidov, R.A. and Lutpullayev, S.L., Global trends in alternative energies and problems in Uzbekistan for the development of renewable energy sources, Appl. Sol. Energy, 2015, vol. 51, pp. 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NREL, Concentrating Solar Power Projects-Solar- PACES, in Conc. Sol. Power Proj., 2014. http:// www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/. Accessed May 2, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuchkarov, A.A., Sobirov, Y.B., Kulakhmedov, N.N., et al., Adjustment of facets of flat and focusing heliostats, concentrators, and Fresnel mirror concentrating systems, Appl. Sol. Energy, 2015, vol. 51, pp. 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franchini, G., Perdichizzi, A., Ravelli, S., and Barigozzi, G., A comparative study between parabolic trough and solar tower technologies in solar rankine cycle and integrated solar combined cycle plants, Sol. Energy, 2013, vol. 98, pp. 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Srilakshmi, G., Venkatesh, V., Thirumalai, N.C., and Suresh, N.S., Challenges and opportunities for solar tower technology in India, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2015, vol. 45, pp. 698–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Augsburger, G., Thermo-Economic Optimisation of Large Solar Tower Power Plants, 2013. https://infoscience. epfl.ch/record/183139/files/EPFL_TH5648.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2016.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    William, B.S. and Michael, G., Power from the Sun, 2001. http://www.powerfromthesun.net/book.html. Accessed June 10, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia, P., Ferriere, A., and Bezian, J.-J., Codes for solar flux calculation dedicated to central receiver system applications: A comparative review, Sol. Energy, 2008, vol. 82, pp. 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collado, F.J. and Guallar, J., Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields, Renew. Energy, 2012, vol. 46, pp. 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clifford, K.H., Software and Codes for Analysis of Concentrating Solar Power Technologies, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND 2008-8053, 2008, pp. 1–35. http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control. cgi/2008/088053.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sebastian, J.B. and Paul, G., Review of Optical Software for use in Concentrating Solar Power Systems, 2012, pp. 1–8. http://concentrating.sun.ac.za/wp-content/ uploads/2012/06/CSP-06.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wendelin, T., SOLTRACE Optical Modeling Software, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), pp. 9–12. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/59163.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Belhomme, B., Pitz-Paal, R., Schwarzbözl, P., and Ulmer, S., A new fast ray tracing tool for high-precision simulation of heliostat fields, J. Sol. Energy Eng., 2009, vol. 131, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wei, X., Lu, Z., Lin, Z., et al., Optimization procedure for design of heliostat field layout of a 1 MWe solar tower thermal power plant, Proc. SPIE, 2007, vol. 6841, pp. 684119/1–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plotkin, A.R., Toupin, K.M., Gillum, C.B., et al., Solar receiver steam generator design for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, ASME 2011 Power Conference, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plotkin, A.R., Toupin, K.M., Gillum, C.B., et al., ASME: Solar receiver steam generator design for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, Energy-Tech., 2012. http://www.energy-tech.com/turbines_- generators/article_b38acbf3-2aa2-524f-8f76-42658- d611f82.html. Accessed August 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho, C.K., Sims, C.A., and Christian, J.M., Evaluation of glare at the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, Energy Procedia, 2015, vol. 69, pp. 1296–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wei, X., Lu, Z., Yu, W., et al., Tracking and ray tracing equations for the target-aligned heliostat for solar tower power plants, Renew. Energy, 2011, vol. 36, pp. 2687–2693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Venkatesh
    • 1
  • Badri S. Rao
    • 1
  • Gopalakrishnan Srilakshmi
    • 1
  • N. C. Thirumalai
    • 1
  • M. A. Ramaswamy
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Study of ScienceTechnology and PolicyBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations