Advertisement

Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 453–457 | Cite as

Maximum Humus Horizon Thickness as a Criterion for Identifying Standard Soils in the Crimean Plain

  • E. I. ErginaEmail author
  • R. V. Gorbunov
  • E. F. Stashkina
SOIL SCIENCE
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract—The identification of the main soil categories in the structure of the regional Red Book should focus on typical soils that were formed taking into account the zonal soil-ecological conditions of the territory. The initial, preagrogenic thickness of the humus horizon that fully implements the soil-forming potential of natural factors of full-profile climax soils can serve as a criterion for identifying standard soils. However, the search for these sites has some methodological difficulties. The proposed mathematical modeling for processes of the soil humus horizon’s formation makes it possible to quantify the legitimacy in the identification of standard soils. This method allows using cartographic models for determining the maximum thickness of the humus horizon. Analysis of the presented material suggests that the profiles of most agricultural lands are currently 30% destroyed in Crimea compared to the estimated maximum thickness of the humus horizon, which predetermines the search for standard soils only in areas that were not previously exposed to agrogenic conditions (most often, in specially protected natural areas), taking into account the features of the zonal process of soil formation.

Keywords: Red Book of Soils mathematical models energy consumption for soil formation 

Notes

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Krasnaya kniga pochv Rossii: Ob”ekty Krasnoi knigi i kadastra osobo tsennykh pochv (The Red Book of Soils of Russia: Objects of the Red Book and the Cadastre of Especially Valuable Soils), Dobrovol’skii, G.V. and Nikitin, E.D., Eds., Moscow: MAKS Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dobrovol’skii, G.V., Chernova, O.V., Semenyuk, O.V., and Bogatyrev, L.G., Principles of selecting reference soils for the Red Data Book of Russian Soils, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2006, no. 4, pp. 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ergina, E.I. and Miroshnichenko, I.A., The concept of compiling the Red Book of Crimean soils, Mat. III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Bioraznoobrazie i ustoichivoe razvitie” (Proc. III Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. Biodiversity and Sustainable Development), Simferopol, 2014, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chernova, O.V., Problems of compiling the Red Book of soils of the chernozem zone of Russia, Pochvovedenie, 2002, no. 12, pp. 1495–1500.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pochvy zapovednikov i natsional’nykh parkov Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Soils of Reserves and National Parks of the Russian Federation), Dobrovol’skii, G.V., Ed., Moscow: NIA-Priroda–Fond Infosfera, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goleusov, P.V. and Lisetskii, F.N., Vosproizvodstvo pochv v antropogennykh landshaftakh lesostepi (Soil Reproduction in Anthropogenic Landscapes of the Forest-Steppe), Belgorod: Izd. Belgorod. Gos. Univ., 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ergina, E.I., Prostranstvenno-vremennye zakonomernosti protsessov sovremennogo pochvoobrazovaniya na Krymskom poluostrove (Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Modern Soil Formation Processes on the Crimean peninsula), Simferopol: IT Arial, 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lisetskii, F.N. and Ergina, E.I., Soil development on the Crimean Peninsula in the late Holocene, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2010, no. 6, pp. 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Svetlichnyi, A.A., Chernyi, S.G., and Shvebs, G.I., Eroziovedenie: Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty: Monografiya (Erosion Studies: Theoretical and Applied Aspects: Monograph), Sumy: Univ. Kn., 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chornii, S.G. and Ergina, E.I., On the classification of eroded soils of Crimea, Geopolit.Ekogeodin., 2010, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ergina, E.I., Modeling of the development of humus horizons in soils of Crimea, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2017, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ergina, E.I., Modeling of the development of humus horizons in soils of Crimea, Pochvovedenie, 2017, no. 1, pp. 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shoba, S.A., Gerasimova, M.I., Targul’yan, V.O., Urusevskaya, I.S., Alyabina, I.O., and Makeev, A.O., Soil-forming potential of natural factors, Genezis, geografiya i ekologiya pochv: Sb. nauch. trud. Mezhdunar. konf. (Genesis, Geography, and Ecology of Soils: Proc. Int. Conf.), Lvov, 1999, pp. 90–92.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Volobuev, V.R., Vvedenie v energetiku pochvoobrazovaniya (Introduction to Soil Formation Energetics), Moscow: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. I. Ergina
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. V. Gorbunov
    • 2
    • 3
  • E. F. Stashkina
    • 4
  1. 1.Vernadsky Crimean Federal UniversitySimferopolRussia
  2. 2.Kovalevsky Institute of Marine Biological Research, Russian Academy of SciencesSevastopolRussia
  3. 3.Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station, Natural Reserve, Russian Academy of SciencesFeodosiaRussia
  4. 4.Nikitsky Botanical Garden, National Research Center, Russian Academy of SciencesYaltaRussia

Personalised recommendations