Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 418–421 | Cite as

The Role of Microbiological Fertilizers and Green Manures in Increasing the Productivity and Quality of Potatoes

  • S. V. ZhevoraEmail author
  • L. S. Fedotova
  • N. A. Timoshina
  • E. V. Knyazeva
Crop Production


This paper presents the research results of three short-term experiments carried out in 2010–2017 on the impact of green manures and mineral and bacterial fertilizers on potato productivity. The purpose of the study was to increase the productivity and quality of potato tubers while reducing the anthropogenic load on the agrocenosis through the integrated use of binary green manures and lower doses of mineral fertilizers in combination with microbiological preparations. In a stationary field experiment (2010–2012) on leached chernozem, the maximum potato productivity (32.2–35.5 t/ha) was obtained using mineral fertilizers N45–90P60–120K60–120 in the crop rotation link oil radish + vetch–potato, while the efficiency of the treatment of tubers with the bacterial preparations Azotovit + Fosfatovit was 9.2–15.0%. In experiments on sod-podzolic soil, the yield increase from the microbiological preparation Agrinos for the potato cultivar Udacha in 2015 amounted to 12.4% along with higher content of starch and vitamin C in production. In the relatively moist 2016 and 2017, the yield increase in the midearly maturing cultivar Gala reached 8.5 t/ha or 24.5% to the mineral background level (N90P90K90). In the variant with a 30% reduced NPK dose and the use of Agrinos (N60P60K60 + Agrinos A + B (5 + 2.5 L/ha), the yield was 5.8 t/ha or 16.7% higher than with the full dose of NPK, and high starchiness and vitamin C content, excellent culinary qualities, and low levels of nitrates were also observed.


potato soil fertility mineral and bacterial fertilizers Azotovit Fosfatovit Agrinos A + B binary green manures 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Agropromyshlennyi kompleks Rossii v 2015 godu (Agro-Industrial Complex of Russia in 2015), Chernetsova, N.A. and Kiseleva, E.B., Eds., Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karpova, E.A., Long-term use of fertilizers and heavy metals in agroecosystems, Probl. Agrokhim. Ekol., 2008, no. 2, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassan, W., Bano, R., Bashir, S., and Aslam, Z., Cadmium toxicity and soil biological index under potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivation, Soil Res., 2016, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 460–468. doi 10.1071/SR14360.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orlov, D.S., Sadovnikova, L.K., and Lozanovskaya, I.N., Ekologiya i okhrana biosfery pri khimicheskom zagryaznenii (Ecology and Protection of the Biosphere under Chemical Pollution), Moscow: Vyssh. Shk., 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belous, N.M., Shapovalov, V.F., Moiseenko, F.V., and Draganskaya, M.G., The influence of various fertilizer systems on the accumulation of heavy metals in agricultural products, Vestn. Bryansk. Gos. S-kh. Akad., Bryansk, 2006, pp. 22–29.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ovcharenko, M.M., Shil’nikov, I.A., Polyakova, D.K., Grafskaya, G.A., Ivanov, L.E., and Sopil’nyak, N.T., Influence of liming and soil acidity on the entry of heavy metals into plants, Agrokhimiya, 1996, no. 1, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fedotova, L.S., Timoshina, N.A., and Novikov, M.A., The relationship of potato fertilizer systems with soil fertility and yield, Kartofel Ovoshchi, 2005, no. 5, pp. 20–22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glinushkin, A.P. and Sokolov, M.A., The role of soil humus in the adaptation of the agrosphere to climate change on Earth, Usp. Sovrem. Nauki, 2017, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mushinskii, A.A. and Solov’eva, V.N., Agrotechnology of high yields of potatoes, Sb. Nauchnykh trudov. Problemy tselinnogo zemledeliya (Collection of Scientific Papers. Problems of Virgin Farming), Orenburg, 2004, pp. 353–359.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shil'nikov, I.A. and Fedotova, L.S., Loss of nutrients from the soil under potatoes, depending on liming and fertilizers, Plodorodie, 2003, no. 3, pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitrofanova, E.M., Influence of liming on the fertility of sod-podzolic soil and crop yield of field crops, Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. Agroprom. Kompleksa, 2013, no. 5, pp. 40–42.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nybor, N. and Hoyt, P.B., Effects of soil acidity and liming on mineralization of soil nitrogen, Can. J. Soil Sci., 1978, vol. 58, pp. 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wertz, S., Leigh, A.K., and Grayston, S.J., Effects of long-term fertilization of forest soils on potential nitrification and on the abundance and community structure of ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 2011, vol. 79, pp. 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zebarth, B.J., Forge, T.A., Goyer, C., and Brin, L.D., Effect of soil acidification on nitrification in soil, Can. J. Soil Sci., 2015, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 359–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Zhevora
    • 1
  • L. S. Fedotova
    • 1
  • N. A. Timoshina
    • 1
  • E. V. Knyazeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Lorkh Potato Research InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations