Advertisement

Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 42, Issue 3–4, pp 218–223 | Cite as

Organic and inorganic fertilization influenced on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes

  • Irshad Ahmad
  • Bashir Ahmad
  • Shahzad AliEmail author
  • Han Qing Fang
  • Tiening Liu
  • Muhammad Kamran
  • Yang Wu
  • Mati Ur Rahman
  • Shah Faisal
Plant Growing
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes (Beta vulgaris L.). Therefore a field trial was carried out at New Developmental Farm of The University Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan during winter 2012–13. The field experiment was layout in randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement having three replications. Fertilizers treatments (control, higo organic plus (composted manure, it contains N 2%, P 3%, K 3%, organic matter 40%, organic carbon 11%, Zn 145 mg kg–1, Cu 56 mg kg–1, Fe 380 mg kg–1 and Mg 228 mg kg–1), maxicrop sea gold (extract of sea weeds i.e., Sargasssum, Laminara Polysaccharide and Ascophyllum Nodosum), farm yard manure, NP (90: 60 kg ha–1), NP (120: 90 kg ha–1) and NP (150: 120 kg ha–1) were allotted to main plots while genotypes (Sandrina, Serenada and Kawe Terma) to the sub plots. Farm yard manure (10 t ha–1) and higo organic Plus (5 t ha–1) was incorporated in the soil before seed bed preparation. Maxicrop sea gold (5 lit ha–1) was sprayed after the emergence of the crop. All phosphorus was applied @ of 60, 90 and 120 kg ha–1 at the time of sowing while nitrogen @ of 90, 120 and 150 kg ha–1 in two splits/3 of the dose was applied at the time of sowing while the remaing 1/3 of the dose was applied before earthen up. Plots treated with application of NP ratio 120: 90 kg ha–1 produced maximum beet yield (76.4 t ha–1), sugar yield (11.1 t ha–1), Pol (polarizable sugar) percentage (14.67%) and more economic return (Rs.234 Thousand ha–1) as compared to control plots. Sugar beet genotype Serenada had significantly produced maximum beet yield (55.5 t ha–1), sugar yield (7.9 t ha–1), pol (polarizable sugar) percentage (14.60%), brix percentage (14.60%) and more economic return (158) as compared to other genotypes. It was concluded from the above results that sugar beet genotype Serenada treated with NP ratio 120: 90 kg ha–1 for improved sugar beet productivity and quality therefore it is recommended for general practice in agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar valley.

Keywords

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Organic and inorganic fertilizers Sugar beet genotypes Yield Polarizable sugar (%) Brix (%) Purity (%) Net return 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Asad, S., Crop Description and Climate in Terms of Water Requirement in Sugar Beet, FAO Home Agriculture, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayaz, M.T., Effect of nitrogen and irrigation on sugar beet production, M. Sc. Thesis., Peshawar: Agric. Univ. Peshawar, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai, B. and Ge, J., The effect of nitrogen amount on photosynthetic rate of sugar beet, Nature Sci., 2004, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 60–63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Food and Agriculture Organization Annual Statistical Report, FAO, 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habtegerial, K., Singh, B.R., and Haile, M., Impact of tillage and nitrogen on fertilization on yield, nitrogen use efficiency of tef Eragrostis, Trotter and soil properties, Soil Till. Res., 2007, vol. 94, pp. 55–63.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Javaheri, M.A., Rashid, N., and Baghizadeh, A., Influence of organic farm yard manure, potassium and boron on quantity and quality of sugar beet in Bardsir region, J. Sugar Beet (Iran), 2005, vol. 21, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan, A.A., Akthar, M., Shah, G.A., and Rehman, H., The effects of different rates and combinations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on the yield and quality of sugar beet, West Pak. J. Agric. Res., 1970, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 210–215.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khan, D., The effect of application methodology and doses of nitrogen and phosphorus on sugar beet husbandry, in Annu. Tech. Rep. S.C.R.I., Mardan, 2003, pp. 72–73.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halvorson, A.D. and Hortman, G.P., Long term nitrogen rates and sources influence sugar beet yield and quality, Agron. J., 1975, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khogali, M.E., Ibrahim, Y.M., and Elhag, M.G., Effect of nitrogen and spacing on growth of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. Crassa) cultivars under Sudan conditions, J. P. Sci. Innov., 2012, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 67–71.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopez, B.L., Castillo, J.E., and Fuentes, M., Nitrogen uptake by autumn sown sugar beet, Fert. Res., 1994, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milford, G.F. and Waston, D.J., The effect on nitrogen on the growth and sugar content of sugar beet, Annu. Bot., 1970, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 287–300.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agriculture Statistics of Pakistan Ministry of Food and Agriculture and Livestock, Islamabad: MINFA, 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oad, F.C., Usmanikhail, M.U., Siddique, M.H., and Junejo, N., Response of sugar beet (Kawe terma) to different fertility levels, Pak. Sug. J., 2008, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sharif, A.E. and Eghbal, K., Yield analysis of seven sugar beet varieties under different levels of nitrogen in a dry region of Egypt, Agric. Biol. Res., 1994, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 213–241.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H., Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biological Approach, New York: McGraw Hills Inc., 1980, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taleghani, D.F., Hemayati, S.S., Noshad, H., Dehaghanshoar, M., Togidloo, G., and Hamdi, F., Effects of different manuring levels on some quantity and quality factors of sugar beet in wheat-sugar beet rotation, J. Sugar Beet (Iran), 2006, vol. 22, pp. 67–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irshad Ahmad
    • 1
  • Bashir Ahmad
    • 1
  • Shahzad Ali
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Han Qing Fang
    • 2
  • Tiening Liu
    • 2
  • Muhammad Kamran
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yang Wu
    • 2
  • Mati Ur Rahman
    • 3
  • Shah Faisal
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agronomythe University of AgriculturePeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.College of AgronomyNorthwest A and F UniversityYangling, ShaanxiChina
  3. 3.Department of Horticulturethe University of AgriculturePeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations