Abstract
Maintaining optimal rumen conditions faces many challenges when feeding ruminants barley grain (BG). This is because >90% of BG endosperm can be rapidly degraded to acids, peptides, and ammonia, whereas corn grain is degraded more slowly and only by 35–50%. Excessive processing may reduce and maintain rumen pH under 5.8, causing prolonged subacute rumen acidosis (SARA) and suppressed immunity. Steam-rolling and grinding are two main global processing methods for BG. It is criticized how inaccurately inherited focus on processing rather than accurate dietary inclusion rate of BG has compromised rumen and ruminant health. Overemphasis on processing methods and quality control have kept producers far from granting deserving thoughts into safe BG inclusion rates under different feeding programs. A major philosophy for steam processing of hard grains (e.g., corn and sorghum) is to increase rumen starch and protein fermentation extent, whereas in softer grains (e.g., BG) a primary goal is totally different, being instead to control and decelerate fermentation shortly post-feeding. These aims must be profoundly appreciated to maximize microbial mass yield and overall VFA production with minimized risks from SARA and immune dysfunction. Optimum dietary inclusion rates and physical form of BG in relation to physiological stage and lactation performance are discussed. In practice, challenges usually arise from too-complex outlooks. Main challenges faced by ruminant industries will not be to alleviate or attenuate disorders such as SARA and pro-inflammatory reactions, but instead to prevent and minimize their occurrence. A perturbing trend in modern ruminant industries has been creating health problems by improper feeding strategies and investing time and other resources to overcome such problems. Optimum processing techniques and feeding strategies of BG should aim to minimize metabolic complexities, and improve economics by more effective prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment. Effectual ruminant management is in controlled microbial cereal starch utilization in the rumen. Rumen is a foremost target to improve starch and BG assimilation in postmodern ruminants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, M.S., Effects of Diet on Short-Term Regulation of Feed Intake by Lactating Dairy Cattle, J. Dairy Sci., 2000, vol. 83, pp. 1598–1624.
Ametaj, B.N., Emmanuel, D.G.V., Zebeli, Q., and Dunn, S.M., Feeding High Proportions of Barley Grain in a Total Mixed Ration Perturbs Diurnal Patterns of Plasma Metabolites in Lactating Dairy Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 2009, vol. 92, pp. 1084–1091.
Arieli, A., Bruckental, I., Kedar, O., and Sklan, D., In Sacco Disappearance of Starch Nitrogen and Fat in Processed Grains, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1995, vol. 51, pp. 287–295.
Bettenay, R.A., Comparison of Caustic Soda-Treated Barley and Rolled Barley in the Ration of Dairy Cows, Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 1980, vol. 20, pp. 394–397.
Bradshaw, W.L., Hinman, D.D., Bull, R.C., Everson, D.O., and Sorensen, S.L., Effects of Barley Variety and Processing Methods on Feedlot Steer Performance and Carcass Characteristics, J. Anim. Sci., 1996, vol. 74, pp. 18–24.
Christen, S.D., Hill, T.M., and Williams, M.S., Effects of Tempered Barley on Milk Yield, Intake, and Digestion Kinetics of Lactating Holstein Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 1996, vol. 79, pp. 1394–1399.
Emmanuel, S., Dunn, M., and Ametaj, B.N., Feeding High Proportions of Barley Grain Stimulates an Inflammatory Response in Dairy Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 2008, vol. 91, pp. 606–614.
Fiems, L.O., Cottyn, B.G., Boucque, Ch.V., Vanacker, J.M., and Buysse, F.X., Effect of Grain Processing on in Sacco Digestibility and Degradability in the Rumen, Arch. Anim. Nutr., 1990, vol. 40, pp. 713–721.
Gozho, G.N. and Mutsvangwa, T., Influence of Carbohydrate Source on Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics, Performance, and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Dairy Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 2008, vol. 91, pp. 2726–2735.
Hall, M.B. and Huntington, G.B., Nutrient Synchrony: Sound in Theory, Elusive in Practice, J. Anim. Sci., 2008, vol. 86, pp. E287–292E.
Herrera-Saldana, R.E., Huber, J.T., and Poore, M.H., Dry Matter, Crude Protein, and Starch Degradability of Five Cereal Grains, J. Dairy Sci., 1990, vol. 73, pp. 2386–2393.
Huntington, G.B., Ruminant Starch Utilization Progress Has Been Extensive, Feedstuff., 1994, vol. 66, pp. 16–18, 38–43.
Huntington, G.B., Starch Utilization by Ruminants: from Basics to the Bunk, J. Dairy Sci., 1997, vol. 75, pp. 852–867.
Iqbal, S., Zebeli, Q., Mazzolari, M., Bertoni, G., Dunn, S.M., Yang, W.Z., and Ametaj, B.N., Feeding Barley Grain Steeped in Lactic Acid Modulates Rumen Fermentation Patterns and Increases Milk Fat Content in Dairy Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 2009, vol. 92, pp. 6023–6032.
Krause, K.M. and Oetzel, G.R., Understanding and Preventing Subacute Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Herds: A Review, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2006, vol. 126, pp. 215–236.
Ljøkjel, K., Harstad, O.M., Prestløkken, E., and Skrede, A., In situ Digestibility of Protein in Barley Grain (Hordeum vulgare) and Peas (Pisum sativum L.) in Dairy Cows: Influence of Heat Treatment and Glucose Addition, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2003a, vol. 107, pp. 87–104.
Ljøkjel, K., Harstad, O.M., Prestløkken, E., and Skrede, A., In situ Digestibility of Starch in Barley Grain (Hordeum vulgare) and Peas (Pisum sativum L.) in Dairy Cows: Influence of Heat Treatment and Glucose Addition, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2003b, vol. 107, pp. 105–116.
Mathison, G.W., Effects of Processing on the Utilization of Grain by Cattle, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1996, vol. 58, pp. 113–125.
McAllister, T.A., Rode, L.M., Major, D.J., Cheng, K.J., and Buchanan-Smith, J.G., Effect of Ruminal Microbial Colonization on Cereal Grain Digestion, Can. J. Anim. Sci., 1990, vol. 70, pp. 571–579.
McGregor, G., Oba, M., Dehghan-banadaky, M., and Corbett, R., Extent of Processing of Barley Grain Did Not Affect Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2007, vol. 138, pp. 272–284.
McNiven, M.A., Weisbjerg, M.R., and Hvelplund, T., Influence of Roasting or Sodium Hydroxide Treatment of Barley on Digestion in Lactating Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 1995, vol. 78, pp. 1106–1115.
Morrison, F.B., Feeds and Feeding, Chap. 4: Factors Affecting the Value of Feeds, NY, Ithaca: The Morrison Publishing Co., 1935, pp. 59–71.
National Research Council, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th Rev. Ed., DC, Washington: National Academy Press, 2001.
Nikkhah, A., Plaizier, J.C., Furedi, C.J., Crow, G.H., and Kennedy, A.D., Time of Feeding: a Determinant of Post Feeding Patterns in Feed Intake of Lactating Cows, J. Dairy Sci. 2007, vol. 90, suppl. 1, p. 559.
Nikkhah, A., Optimizing Barley Grain Use by Dairy Cows: A Betterment of Current Perceptions, in Progress in Food Science and Technology, New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2011a, vol. 1, pp. 165–178.
Nikkhah, A., Barley Forage for Environmentalist Ruminants: a Distinctive Effective Fiber and Fermentable Energy Entity, in Barley: Production, Cultivation and Uses, New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2011b, pp. 233–245.
Nikkhah, A. and Ghorbani, G.R., Effects of Dry and Steam Processing on in situ Ruminal Digestion Kinetics of Barley Grain, J. Anim. Sci. 2003, vol. 81,suppl. 1, p. 338.
Nikkhah, A., Alikhani, M., and Amanlou, H., Effects of Feeding Ground or Steam-Flaked Broom Sorghum and Ground Barley on Performance of Dairy Cows in Midlactation, J. Dairy Sci., 2004, vol. 87, pp. 122–130.
Nikkhah, A., Amiri, F., Khanaki, H., and Amanlou, H., Wheat Grain in Dairy Rations: A Major Feasible Commodity Overlooked, in Progress in Food Science and Technology, New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2011, pp. 243–252.
Nocek, J.E. and Tamminga, S., Site of Digestion of Starch in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Dairy Cows and Its Effect on Milk Production, J. Dairy Sci., 1991, vol. 74, pp. 3598–3629.
Nordin, M. and Campling, R.C., Digestibility Studies with Cows Given Whole and Rolled Cereal Grains, Anim. Prod., 1976, vol. 23, pp. 305–315.
Orskov, E.R. and Greenhalgh, J.F.D., Alkali Treatment as Amethod of Processing Whole Grain for Cattle, J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.), 1977, vol. 89, pp. 253–255.
Orskov, E.R., Starch Digestion and Utilization in Ruminants, J. Anim. Sci., 1986, vol. 63, pp. 1624–1633.
Offner, A. and Sauvant, D., Prediction of in vivo Starch Digestion in Cattle from in situ Data, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2004, vol. 111, pp. 41–56.
Owens, F.N., Secrist, D.S., Hill, W.J., and Gill, D.R., The Effect of Grain Source and Grain Processing on Performance of Feedlot Cattle: a Review, J. Anim. Sci., 1997, vol. 75, pp. 868–879.
Plaizier, J.C.P., Krause, D.O., Gozho, G.N., and McBride, B.W., Subacute Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cows: The Physiological Causes, Incidence and Consequences, Vet. J., 2008, vol. 176, pp. 21–31.
Robinson, P.H. and McNiven, M.A., Influence of Flame Roasting and Feeding Frequency of Barley on Performance of Dairy Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 1994, vol. 77, pp. 3631–3643.
Sadri, H., Ghorbani, G.H., Alikhani, M., Babaei, M., and Nikkhah, A., Ground, Dry-Rolled, and SteamRolled Barley Grain for Midlactation Holstein Cows, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2007, vol. 138, pp. 195–204.
Silveira, C., Oba, M., Beauchemin, K.A., and Helm, J., Effect of Grains Differing in Expected Ruminal Fermentability on the Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 2007, vol. 90, pp. 2852–2859.
Smith, D., Removing and Analyzing Carbohydrates from Plant Tissue, Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep., no. R2107, Madison.
Sniffen, C.J., O’Connor, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., Fox, D.G., and Russell, J.B., A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Evaluating Cattle Diets: II: Carbohydrate and Protein Availability, J. Anim. Sci., 1992, vol. 70, pp. 3562–3577.
Soltani, A., Ghorbani, G.R., Alikhani, M., Samie, A., and Nikkhah, A., Ground Versus Steam-Rolled Barley Grain for Lactating Cows: a Clarification into Conventional Beliefs, J. Dairy Sci., 2009, vol. 92, pp. 3299–3305.
Stone, W.C., Nutritional Approaches to Minimize Subacute Ruminal Acidosis and Laminitis in Dairy Cattle, J. Dairy Sci., 2004, vol. 87, pp. 13–26.
Svihus, B., Uhlen, A.K., and Harstad, O.M., Effect of Starch Granule Structure, Associated Components and Processing on Nutritive Value of Cereal Starch: a Review, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2005, vol. 122, pp. 303–320.
Theurer, C.B., Huber, J.T., Delgado-Elorduy, A., and Wanderley, R., Invited Review: Summary of SteamFlaking Corn and Sorghum Grains for Lactating Dairy Cow, J. Dairy Sci., 1999, vol. 82, pp. 1950–1959.
Tothi, R., Lund, P., Weisbjerg, M.R., and Hvelplund, T., Effect of Expander Processing on Fractional Rate of Maize and Barley Starch Degradation in the Rumen of Dairy Cows Estimated Using Rumen Evacuation and in situ Techniques, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2003, vol. 104, pp. 71–94.
Van Soest, P.J., Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed., NY, Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press, 1994.
Yang, W.Z., Beauchemin, K.A., and Rode, L.M., Effects of Barley Grain Processing on Extent of Digestion and Milk Production of Lactating Cows, J. Dairy Sci., 2000, vol. 83, pp. 554–568.
Yang, W.Z. and Beauchemin, K.A., Grain Processing, Forage-to-Concentrate Ratio, and Forage Length Effects on Ruminal Nitrogen Degradation and Flows of Amino Acids to the Duodenum, J. Dairy Sci., 2004, vol. 87, pp. 2578–2590.
Yang, W.Z., Beauchemin, K.A., Koenig, K.M., and Rode, L.M., Comparison of Hull-Less Barley, Barley, or Corn for Lactating Cows: Effects on Extent of Digestion and Milk Production, J. Dairy Sci., 1997, vol. 80, pp. 2475–2486.
Yang, W.Z. and Beauchemin, K.A., Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Chewing Activity and Ruminal pH of Dairy Cows Fed Diets Based on Barley Silage, J. Dairy Sci., 2006, vol. 89, pp. 217–228.
Zinn, R.A., Influence of Processing on the Comparative Feeding Value of Barley for Feedlot Cattle, J. Anim. Sci., 1993, vol. 71, pp. 3–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
About this article
Cite this article
Nikkhah, A. Postmodern management of starchy grains for ruminants: A barley grain perspective. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 38, 14–21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3103/S106836741201017X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S106836741201017X