Journal of Friction and Wear

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 290–293 | Cite as

Geometric model of height of microroughness on machined surface taking into account wear of face mill teeth

  • D. Yu. PimenovEmail author


The present paper describes a geometric model of the height of microroughness on the machined flat surface after the face milling with the account of wear of tools. The model takes into account the height variations of microroughness on the flat surface due to the dimensional wear of the radius portion of apexes of face mill teeth. The work resulted in the findings of the height of microroughness at different feeds, rounding radii, different front and back angles of the mill tooth taking into account the wear of tools over the tailing surface.


face milling wear tools height of microroughness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Diniz, A.E. and Filho, J.C., Influence of the relative positions of tool and workpiece on tool life, tool wear and surface finish in the face milling process, Wear, 1999, vol. 232, pp. 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., The effect of the rate flank wear teeth face mills on the processing, J. Friction Wear, 2013, vol. 34, pp. 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koshy, P., Dewes, R.C., and Aspinwall, D.K., High speed end milling of hardened AISI D2 tool steel (∼58 HRC), J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2002, vol. 127, pp. 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guzeev, V.I. and Pimenov, D.Yu., Cutting force in face milling with tool wear, Russ. Eng. Res., 2011, vol. 31, pp. 989–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, Z.Q., Ai, X., Zhang, H., Wang, Z.T., and Wan, Y., Wear patterns and mechanisms of cutting tools in high-speed face milling, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2002, vol. 129, pp. 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., Guzeev, V.I., and Koshin, A.A., Elastic displacement of a technological system in face milling with tool wear, Russ. Eng. Res., 2011, vol. 31, pp. 1105–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jawaid, A., Koksal, S., and Sharif, S., Cutting performance and wear characteristics of PED coated and uncoated carbide tools in face milling inconel 718 aerospace alloy, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2001, vol. 116, pp. 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loladze, T.N., Prochnost’ i iznosostoikost’ rezhushchego instrumenta, (The Durability and Wear-Resistance of Cutting Tool), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1982.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tverskoi, M.M., Avtomaticheskoe upravlenie rezhimami obrabotki detalei na stankakh s ChPU, (Automatic Control of Detail Treatment Regimes on the Numerical Control Machines), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shul’ts, V.V., Forma estestvennogo iznosa detalei mashin i instrumenta, (Form of the Natural Wear of Machine Details and Tool), Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Granovskii, G.I. and Granovskii, V.G., Rezanie metallov: Uchebnik dlya mashinostr. i priborostr. spets. vuzov (Cutting of Metals: A Textbook for Machine- and Device-Building Special Education Institutes), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gu, J., Barber, G., Tung, S., and Gu, R.J., Tool life and wear mechanism of uncoated and coated milling inserts, Wear, 1999, vol. 225–229, pp. 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C.-H., Wang, Y.-C., and Lee, B.-Y., The effect of surface roughness of end-mills on optimal cutting performance for high-speed machining, J. Mech. Eng., 2013, vol. 59, pp. 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dae, K.B., Tae, J.K., and Hee, S.K., A dynamic surface roughness model for face milling, Precision Eng., 1997, vol. 20, pp. 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benardos, P.G. and Vosniakos, G.C., Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments, Robot. Comp.-Integr. Manufact., 2002, vol. 18, pp. 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benardos, P.G. and Vosniakos, G.-C., Predicting surface roughness in machining: A review, Int. J. Machine Tools Manufact., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 833–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grzenda, M. and Bustillo, A., The Evolutionary Development of Roughness Prediction Models, Appl. Soft Comp. J., 2013, vol. 13, pp. 2913–2922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grzenda, M., Bustillo, A., Quintana, G., and Ciurana, J., Improvement of surface roughness models for face milling operations through dimensionality reduction, Int. Comp.-Aided Eng., 2012, vol. 19, pp. 179–197.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guzeev, V.I. and Pimenov, D.Yu., Stressed state nonstationarity specified by shearing strain on the back of a mill tooth, Tekhnol. Mashinostr., 2010, no. 7, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., Stress distribution model development on the milling cutter tooth back surface, Tekhnol. Mashinostr., 2010, no. 1, pp. 48–52.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., Guzeev, V.I., and Pashnyov, V.A., Specification of allowable wear of face-milling cutter for assurance of precision requirement, Vestnik Mashinostr., 2012, no. 10, pp. 68–72.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., Influence of technological processing parameters and wear face mills for cutting force, Tyazheloe Mashinostr., 2012, no. 10, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., Guzeev, V.I., and Koshin, A.A., The analysis of pressure on a back surface of a tooth of a face mill depending on modes of cutting, Fundam. Appl. Problems Tech. Technol., 2011, vol. 285, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pimenov, D.Yu., Guzeev, V.I., and Koshin, A.A., Influence of cutting conditions on the stress at tool’s rear surface, Russ. Eng. Res., 2011, vol. 31, pp. 1151–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State University (National Research University)ChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations