Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute

, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 127–134 | Cite as

Heavy-particle energy loss simulation using the Geant4 toolkit

  • A. V. Bagulya
  • M. S. Vladimirov
  • V. N. Ivanchenko
  • N. I. Starkov
Article

Abstract

Currently, the Geant4 is a standard tool for simulating experiments in high-energy physics. In this paper, we describe an improvement of the ionization model for hadrons, ions, and classical magnetic monopole, implemented in Geant4. Simulation results are discussed; their accuracy is analyzed depending on chosen parameters, and compared with experimental data.

Keywords

Energy Loss Large Hadron Collider LEBEDEV Physic Institute Magnetic Monopole Large Hadron Collider Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Benerjee et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 119, 032007 (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Dowler et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 482, 94 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Arce et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 502, 687 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Santin, V. Ivanchenko, H. Evans et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52, 2294 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Jan et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 4543 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Lassila-Perini and L. Urban, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 362, 416 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    A. Allisy et al., ICRU Report 49, 1 (1993).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Lindhard and A. Winther, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat.-Fys. Medd. 34, 4 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. F. Ziegler and J.M. Manoyan. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 35, 215 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. A. Kumakhov and F. F. Komarov, Ion Energy Loss in Solids (BGU, Minsk, 1979) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Abulencia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 201801 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. P. Ahlen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 121 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. R. Kalbfleisch et al., Phys. Rev. D 69, 052002 (2004).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Bagulya, I. Gudowska, V. Ivanchenko, and N. Starkov, “Proton/Ion Bragg Peak Validation,” in 11th Geant4 Collaboration Workshop, Lisbon, 2006; http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/collaboration/working_groups/electromagnetic/presentations.shtml
  19. 19.
    W. H. Press et al., Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Folger, V. N. Ivanchenko and H. P. Wellisch, Eur. Phys. J. A 21, 407 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    U. Oelfke, G. K. Y. Lam, and M. S. Atkins, Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 177 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Bagulya
  • M. S. Vladimirov
  • V. N. Ivanchenko
    • 1
  • N. I. Starkov
  1. 1.Ecoanalytica Ecology-Analytical AssociationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations