Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 23–31 | Cite as

An Experimental Investigation on the Copper Recovery from Flotation Tailing Dams by Reflotation

  • Seyed Kamal Mousavinezhad
  • Parviz Pourghahramani
  • Sajjad Aghazadeh
Mineral Processing of Nonferrous Metals
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the possibility of copper recovery from flotation tailing of Mazraeh copper mine was investigated. Magnetic separation method was used for concentration of non-magnetic minerals, especially copper bearing minerals, from iron minerals. As a result, copper grade increased up to 0.18% and its recovery reached 86%. Due to mineral’s oxidized surface, accompanied oxide minerals and large quantities of fine particles (i.e. about 80% and 57% were finer than 37 and 15 μm in the sample, respectively), flotation of copper was very difficult. In this regard, the effects of important factors including solution pH, type and collector dosage, dispersant, impeller speed, type of frother, percent solid and surface sulfurization were studied. It was concluded that copper recovery of 52% and copper grade of 2.7% could be obtained under following conditions: pH: 11, Collector: Z11 with 40 g/t, Impeller speed: 1400 rpm, Frother: A65, percent solid: 10% and surface sulfurization by Na2S with 1000 g/t. On the other hand, the addition of sodium silicate as a dispersant showed a negative effect on the flotation performance.

Keywords

Mazraeh mine tailing copper flotation Z11 A65 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antonijevíc, M., Dimitrijevíc, M., Stevanovíc, Z., Serbula, S.M., and Bogdanovíc, G.D., Investigation of the possibility of copper recovery from the flotation tailings by acid leaching, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castilla, J.C., Environmental impact in sandy beaches of copper mine tailings at Chanaral, Chile, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 1983, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smart, R.S.C., Surface layers in base metal sulphide flotation, Miner. Eng., 1991, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 891–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aghazadeh, S., Mousavinezhad, S.K., and Gharabaghi, M., Chemical and colloidal aspects of collectorless flotation behavior of sulfide and non-sulfide minerals, Adv. Colloids Interface Sci., 2015, vol. 225, pp. 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cilek, E. and Yilmazer, B., Effects of hydrodynamic parameters on entrainment and flotation performance, Miner. Eng., 2003, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 745–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodrigues, W., Leal Filho, L., and Masini, E., Hydrodynamic dimensionless parameters and their influence on flotation performance of coarse particles, Miner. Eng., 2001, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1047–1054.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cilek, E.C., The effect of hydrodynamic conditions on true flotation and entrainment in flotation of a complex sulphide ore, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2009, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmed, N. Jameson, G., The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1985, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grau, R. and Heiskanen, K., Bubble size distribution in laboratory scale flotation cells, Miner. Eng., 2005, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1164–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grau, R. Heiskanen, K., Visual technique for measuring bubble size in flotation machines, Miner. Eng., 2002, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vera, M., Franzidis, J., and Manlapig, E., Simultaneous determination of collection zone rate constant and froth zone recovery in a mechanical flotation environment, Miner. Eng., 1999, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miettinen, T., Ralston, J., and Fornasiero, D., The limits of fine particle flotation, Miner. Eng., 2010, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schubert, H., On the optimization of hydrodynamics in fine particle flotation, Miner. Eng., 2008, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 930–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Subrahmanyam, T. and Forssberg, K.E., Fine particles processing: shear-flocculation and carrier flotation-a review, Int. J. Miner. Process, 1990, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feng, D. and Aldrich, C., Effect of particle size on flotation performance of complex sulphide ores, Miner. Eng., 1999, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 721–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schubert, H., On the turbulence-controlled microprocesses in flotation machines, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1999, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tao, D., Role of bubble size in flotation of coarse and fine particles-a review, Separat. Sci. Technol., 2005, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 741–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Finch, J.A., Nesset, J.E., and Acuna, C., Role of frother on bubble production and behaviour in flotation, Miner. Eng., 2008, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 949–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khoshdast, H. and Sam, A., Flotation frothers: review of their classifications, properties and preparation, Open Miner. Process. J., 2011, vol. 4, pp. 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grau, R.A., Laskowski, J.S., and Heiskanen, K., Effect of frothers on bubble size, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2005, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benzaazoua, M. and Kongolo, M., Physico-chemical properties of tailing slurries during environmental desulphurization by froth flotation, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2003, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cho, Y.-S. and Laskowski, J., Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2002, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kracht, W. and Finch, J., Effect of frother on initial bubble shape and velocity, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2010, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Melo, F. and Laskowski, J., Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation, Miner. Eng., 2006, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 766–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neethling, S. and Cilliers, J., The entrainment of gangue into a flotation froth, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2002, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gharabaghi, M. and Aghazadeh, S., A review of the role of wetting and spreading phenomena on the flotation practice, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 2014, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    He, W., Ye, G.-E., and Zhang, S., Flotation of high oxidation rate and high binding rate refractory copper ore, Environ. Energy Sustain. Develop., 2013, vol. 4, p. 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Majima, H., How oxidation affects selective flotation of complex sulphide ores, Can. Metall. Quart., 1969, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee, K., Archibald, D., McLean, J., and Reuter, M., Flotation of mixed copper oxide and sulphide minerals with xanthate and hydroxamate collectors, Miner. Eng., 2009, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Castro, S., Goldfarb, J., and Laskowski, J., Sulphidizing reactions in the flotation of oxidized copper minerals. I. Chemical factors in the sulphidization of copper oxide, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1974, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tegin, I. and Ziyadanoglllari, R., The effect of sulfurization process on flotation of copper ore containing gold and silver, J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng., 2008, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 193.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peng, Y. and Zhao, S., The effect of surface oxidation of copper sulfide minerals on clay slime coating in flotation, Miner. Eng., 2011, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 1687–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Castro, S., Soto, H., Goldfarb, J., and Laskowski, J., Sulphidizing reactions in the flotation of oxidized copper minerals. II. Role of the adsorption and oxidation of sodium sulphide in the flotation of chrysocolla and malachite, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1974, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ziyadanogullari, R. and Aydin, F., A new application for flotation of oxidized copper ore, J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng., 2005, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 67.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang, X.-S. and Aldrich, C., Effects of impeller speed and aeration rate on flotation performance of sulphide ore, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2006, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grano, S., Effect of impeller rotational speed on the size dependent flotation rate of galena in full scale plant cells, Miner. Eng., 2006, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 1307–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    George, P. Nguyen, A., and Jameson, G., Assessment of true flotation and entrainment in the flotation of submicron particles by fine bubbles, Miner. Eng., 2004, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 847–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martinez-Gómez, V., Pérez-Garibay, R., and Rubio, J., Factors involving the solids-carrying flotation capacity of microbubbles, Miner. Eng., 2013, vol. 53, pp. 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Banisi, S., Finch, J., Laplante, A., and Weber, M., Effect of solid particles on gas holdup in flotation columns. I. Measurement, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1995, vol. 50, no. 14, pp. 2329–2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fullston, D., Fornasiero, D., and Ralston, J., Zeta potential study of the oxidation of copper sulfide minerals, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 1999, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ma, M., The dispersive effect of sodium silicate on kaolinite particles in process water: Implications for iron-ore processing, Clays Clay Miner., 2011, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lu, S., Song, S., and Dai, Z., Dispersion of fine mineral particles in water, Adv. Powder Technol., 1992, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Atrafi, A., Hodjatoleslami, H., Noaparast, M., Shafaei, Z., and Ghorbani, A., Implementation of flotation and gravity separation, to process Changarzeh sulfide–oxide lead ore, J. Min. Environ., 2012, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Haselhuhn III, H.J., The Dispersion and Selective Flocculation of Hematite Ore, Houghton, MI: Michigan Technol. Univ., 2015.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dai, Z., Fornasiero, D., and Ralston, J., Particle–bubble attachment in mineral flotation, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 1999, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yoon, R. and Luttrell, G., The effect of bubble size on fine particle flotation, Miner. Process. Extract. Metall. Rev., 1989, vol. 5, nos. 1–4, pp. 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Veiskarami, M.N., Shafaei, S.Z., and Gharabaghi, M., Cu recovery from copper smelter slag sample, using flotation with two-level fractional factorial design approach, Hydrometall. Process., 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seyed Kamal Mousavinezhad
    • 1
  • Parviz Pourghahramani
    • 2
  • Sajjad Aghazadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mining EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Mining EngineeringSahand University of TechnologyTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations