Distributed Clutter-Map Constant False Alarm Rate Detection Using Fuzzy Fusion Rules

  • H. E. BouchelaghemEmail author
  • M. Hamadouche
  • F. Soltani
  • K. Baddari


The performance of distributed adaptive clutter map constant false alarm rate (CMAP-CFAR) detection system using fuzzy fusion rules with homogeneous and non-homogeneous background is considered in this paper. We assume that the sensors are identical and the target is fluctuating according to Swerling I model embedded in a white Gaussian noise with unknown variance. Each detector computes the value of the membership function to the false alarm space from the previous samples of the cell under test and transmits it to the fusion center. These values are combined according to fuzzy fusion rules to produce a global membership function to the false alarm space. The obtained results showed that the best performance was obtained while using the “algebraic product” fuzzy rule and the probability of detection increases significantly with the number of detectors.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Nitzberg, “Clutter map CFAR analysis,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Systems AES–22, No. 4, 419 (July 1986). DOI: Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Hamadouche, M. Barakat, M. Khodja, “Analysis of the clutter map CFAR in Weibull clutter,” Signal Processing 80, No. 1, 117 (2000). DOI: Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. Hammoudi, F. Soltani, “Distributed CA–CFAR and OS–CFAR detection using fuzzy spaces and fuzzy fusion rules,” IEE Proc.–Radar Sonar Navigation 151, No. 3, 135 (2004). DOI: Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. E. Bouchelaghem, M. Hamadouche, F. Soltani, K. Baddari, “Adaptive clutter–map CFAR detection in distributed sensor networks,” AEU–Int. J. Electronics Commun. 70, No. 9, 1288 (2016). DOI: Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. E. Bouchelaghem, M. Hamadouche, F. Soltani, K. Badari, “Analysis of distributed clutter–map CFAR detection using fuzzy fusion rules,” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Mechanics and Aeronautics, CIMA 2016, 18–20 Oct. 2016, Algiers, Algeria (2016).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1984).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. E. Bouchelaghem, M. Hamadouche, “Performance analysis of a new CFAR detector for heterogeneous environments,” Digital Signal Processing 9, No. 2, 35 (2017). URI: Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. E. Bouchelaghem, M. Hamadouche, “Fuzzy CACMAP–CFAR performance analysis,” Fuzzy Systems 9, No. 3, 45 (2017). URI: Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohamed B. El Mashade, “Multitarget analysis of CFAR detection of partially–correlated 2 targets,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst. 59, No. 1, 1 (2016). DOI: Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohamed B. El Mashade, “Heterogeneous performance evaluation of sophisticated versions of CFAR detection schemes,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst. 59, No. 12, 536 (2016). DOI: Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. E. Bouchelaghem
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Hamadouche
    • 1
  • F. Soltani
    • 2
  • K. Baddari
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BoumerdesBoumerdesAlgeria
  2. 2.Université de ConstantineConstantineAlgeria

Personalised recommendations