Advertisement

Radioelectronics and Communications Systems

, Volume 59, Issue 12, pp 536–551 | Cite as

Heterogeneous performance evaluation of sophisticated versions of CFAR detection schemes

  • Mohamed B. El MashadeEmail author
Article

Abstract

The detection of radar targets in a background, the statistical parameters of which are unknown and may not be stationary, can be effectively achieved through CFAR processors. The CA-CFAR scheme performs optimally for homogeneous and exponentially distributed clutter observations. However, it exhibits severe performance degradation in the presence of outlying target returns in the reference set or in regions of abrupt change in the background clutter power. The OS-CFAR processor has been proposed to solve both of these problems. Although this processor may treat target multiplicity quite well, it lacks effectiveness in preventing excessive false alarms during clutter power transitions. The TM-CFAR algorithm, which implements trimmed averaging after ordering, can be considered as a modified version of OS technique. By knowingly trimming the ordered samples, the TM detector may actually perform better than the OS processor. To simultaneously exploit the merits of CA, OS, and TM schemes, two combinations namely CAOS and CATM have been suggested. Each one of these versions optimizes good features of two CFAR detectors, depending on the characteristics of clutter and searched targets, with the goal of enhancing the detection performance under constant level of false alarm. It is realized by parallel operation of two standard types of CFARschemes. Our goal in this paper is to analyze these two developed versions in heterogeneous situations, to show to what extent they can improve the behavior of the conventional CFAR processors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. P. Gandhi, S. A. Kassam, “Analysis of CFAR processors in homogeneous background,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 14, No. 4, 427 (Jul. 1988). DOI: 10.1109/7.7185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Performance analysis of modified ordered-statistics CFAR processors in nonhomogeneous environments,” Signal Processing 41, No. 3, 379 (Feb. 1995). DOI: 10.1016/0165-1684(94)00109-D.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Monopulse detection analysis of the trimmed mean level CFAR processor in nonhomogeneous situations,” IEE Radar, Sonar Navig. 143, No. 2, 87 (Apr. 1996). DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:19960324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Detection analysis of linearly combined order statistic CFAR algorithms in nonhomogeneous background environments,” Signal Processing 68, No. 1, 59 (Jul. 1998). DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1684(98)00057-7.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. B. El Mashade, “M-sweeps exact performance analysis of OS modified versions in nonhomogeneous environments,” IEICE Trans. Commun. E88-B, No. 7, 2918 (2005). DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e88-b.7.2918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Analysis of cell-averaging based detectors for 2 fluctuating targets in multitarget environments,” J. Electron. (China) 23, No. 6, 853 (Nov. 2006). DOI: 10.1007/s11767-005-0067-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Performance analysis of OS structure of CFAR detectors in fluctuating target environments,” PIER C 2, 127 (2008). DOI: 10.2528/PIERC08022807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Magaz, A. Belouchrani, M. Hamadouche, “A new adaptive linear combined CFAR detector in presence of interfering targets,” PIER B 34, 367 (2011). DOI: 10.2528/PIERB11012603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Analysis of adaptive detection of moderately fluctuating radar targets in target multiplicity environments,” J. Franklin Inst. 348, No. 6, 941 (Aug. 2011). DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.03.004.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Performance analysis of CFAR detection of fluctuating radar targets in nonideal operating environments,” Int. J. Aerospace Sci. 1, No. 3, 21 (2012). DOI: 10.5923/j.aerospace.20120103.01.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Q. Wang, Radar Systems: Technology, Principles and Applications (Nova Sci. Pub., Inc., 2013).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohamed B. El Mashade, “Analytical performance evaluation of adaptive detection of fluctuating radar targets,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst. 56, No. 7, 321 (2013). DOI: 10.3103/S0735272713070017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dejan Ivkoviã, Milenko Andriã, Bojan Zrniã, “A new model of CFAR detector,” Frequenz 68, Nos. 3–4, 125 (Mar. 2014). DOI: 10.1515/freq-2013-0087.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Performance enhancement of the conventional CFAR processors in ideal and multitarget environments,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst. 57, No. 7, 287 (2014). DOI: 10.3103/S0735272714070012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dejan Ivkoviã, Milenko Andriã, Bojan Zrniã, “False alarm analysis of the CATM-CFAR in presence of clutter edge,” Radioengineering 23, No. 1, 66 (Apr. 2014), http://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2014/14_01_ 0066_0072.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Al-Azhar UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations