Radioelectronics and Communications Systems

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

Multitarget analysis of CFAR detection of partially-correlated χ2 targets

  • Mohamed B. El MashadeEmail author


The goal of this paper is to treat the problem of detecting the partially-correlated χ2 fluctuating targets with two and four degrees of freedom. We analyze the detection performance in general terms of the more generalized version, which is known asGTM,of theCFARprocessors when the operating environment is contaminated with outlying target returns and the radar receiver carries its processing based on post-detection integration of M exponentially correlated pulses. Analytical formulas for the detection and false alarm probabilities are derived, in the absence as well as in the presence of spurious targets which are assumed to be moderately fluctuating following χ2 target models. A performance assessment by numerous numerical examples, which has considered the role that each parameter can play in the processor performance, is given. The obtained results show that the processor performance enhances, for weak SNR of the primary target, as the correlation coefficient ρs increases and this occurs either in the absence or in the presence of extraneous targets. As the strength of the target return increases, the processor tends to invert its behavior. The well-known Swerling models embrace the correlated target cases in the situation where the correlation among the target returns follows χ2 fluctuation models with two and four degrees of freedom and this behavior is common for allGTMbased detectors.


False Alarm Moment Generate Function Radar Cross Section False Alarm Probability Constant False Alarm Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W.-Q. Wang (ed.), Radar Systems: Technology, Principles and Applications (Nova Science Pub. Inc., 2013), ISBN-10: 1624178723.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Zhao, W. Liu, J. S. Fu, S. Yong Seow, X. Wu, “Two new CFAR detectors based on OR-algorithm and AND-algorithm,” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Research and Development, SCOReD, 2001, KL, Malaysia (2001), pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Analysis of the censored-mean level CFAR processor in multiple target and nonuniform clutter,” IEE Proc. Radar, Sonar Navig. 142, No. 5, 259 (Oct. 1995), DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:19951985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Detection performance of the trimmed-mean CFAR processor with noncoherent integration,” IEE Proc. Radar, Sonar Navig. 142, No. 1, 18 (Feb. 1995), DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:19951626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peter Swerling, “Radar probabilitity of detection for some additional fluctuating target cases,” IEEE Trans,” Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 33, No. 2, 698 (Apr. 1997), DOI: 10.1109/7.588492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Hammoudi, F. Soltani, “Distributed CA-CFAR and OS-CFAR detection using fuzzy spaces and fuzzy fusion rules,” IEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig. 151, No. 3, 135 (Jun. 2004), DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20040560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Multipulse analysis of the generalized trimmed-mean CFAR detector in nonhomogeneous background environments,” AEU 52, No. 4, 249 (Aug. 1998).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Target multiplicity performance analysis of radar CFAR detection techniques for partially correlated chi-square targets,” AEU 56, No. 2, 84 (Apr. 2002), DOI: 10.1078/1434-8411-54100077.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atef Farrouki, Mourad Barkat, “Automatic censored mean level detector using a variability-based censoring with non-coherent integration,” Signal Processing 87, No. 6, 1462 (Jun. 2007), DOI: 10.1016/jsigpro.2006.12.012.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lei Zhao, Weixian Liu, Xin Wu, J. S. Fu, “A novel approach for CFAR processors design,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Radar Conf., 1–3 May 2001, Atlanta, GA (IEEE, 2001), pp. 284–288, DOI: 10.1109/NRC.2001.922992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Analysis of adaptive detection of moderately fluctuating radar targets in target multiplicity environments,” J. Franklin Inst. 348, No. 6, 941 (Aug. 2011), DOI: 10.1016/jjfranklin.2011.03.004.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Target-multiplicity analysis of CML processor for partially-correlated 2 targets,” Int,” J. Aerosp. Sci. 1, No. 5, 92 (2012), DOI: 10.5923/jaerospace.20120105.02.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Multiple-target analysis of adaptive detection of partially correlated 2 targets,” Int,” J. Space Sci. Eng. 1, No. 2, 142 (2013), DOI: 10.1504/IJSPACESE.2013.054450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Analytical performance evaluation of optimum detection of 2 fluctuating targets with M-integrated pulses,” Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1, No. 2, 93 (2011), DOI: 10.5923/jeee.20110102.15.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Detection analysis of linearly combined order statistic CFAR algorithm in nonhomogeneous background environments,” Signal Processing 68, No. 1, 59 (Jul. 1998), DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1684(98)00057-7.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Performance comparison of a linearly combined ordered-statistic detectors under postdetection integration and nonhomogeneous situations,” J. Electron. (China) 23, No. 5, 698 (Sept. 2006), DOI: 10.1007/s11767-004-0213-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. B. El Mashade, “Analysis of CFAR detection of partially-correlated X2 targets in the presence of interferers,” Majlesi J. Electrical Eng. 7, No. 3, 43 (Sept. 2013), http://mjeeiaumajlesiacir/index/indexphp/ee/article /view/880.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Al-Azhar UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations