Abstract
This paper discusses the origins of modern policies aimed at encouraging scientific publication activities, the impact of such policies on scientific journals, and the possibility of assessing the effectiveness of research activities on the basis of quantitative indicators for issued journals. It is concluded that it is necessary to improve the methods that are applied for performance assessment in the scientific field. These methods should be based on indicators that take the entire system of scientific activities into account and not only one publication component, which represents the final stage of scientific research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pis’mo Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 18 marta 2014 g. № AK-610/05 “O provedenii monitoringa effektivnosti obrazovatel’nykh organizatsii vysshego obrazovaniya v 2014 godu” (Letter of RF Ministry of Education 18.03.2014 “On Monitoring of Effectiveness of Educational Organization of High Education in 2014”).
Garfield, E., What is the primordial reference for the phrase’ publish or perish’? Scientist, 1996. vol.10, No. 12, pp. 11–12.
Letters of Marshall McLuhan, Molinaro, M., McLuhan, C., and Toye, W., Eds., Toronto: Oxford Univ., 1987.
Wilson, L., A Study in the Sociology of a Profession, New York: Oxford University, 1942.
Coolidge, H.J., Archibald Cary Coolidge: Life and Letters, London: R. H. Lord Books for Libraries, 1932.
Association of American Colleges Bulletin, 1938, vol. 24, pp. 462–469.
Bonits, M., Nauchnoe issledovanie i nauchnaya informatsiya, ((Wissenschaftliche Forschung und wissenschaftliche Informationen), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.
Bernstein, P.L., Against the Gods. The Remarcable Story of Risk, New York: Wiley, 1996; Moscow: Olimp Biznes, 2006.
Bernal, J.D., The Social Function of Science, Appendix VIII. Watson, D., Project for Scientific Publication and Bibliography, London: Routlege, 1939..
Ortega y Gasset, J., Rebelión de las Masas, Madrid, 1929; The Revolt of the Masses, New York, 1932.
Ziman, J., Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ., 1957.
Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards to Post Critical Philosophy, Chicago: Univ. Chicago, 1958; Moscow: 1985.
Garvey, W.D., Communication: The Essence of Science, Oxford: Pergamon, 1979.
Merton, R.K., Matphey Effect in Science. Accumulation of Preferences and Symbolism of Intellectual Property, THESIS, 1993, No. 3, pp. 256–276.
Cowl, J., Schemes of intellectual influence in scientific researches, in Kommunikatsiya v sovremennoi nauke (Communication in Contemporary Science) Moscow: Progress, 1976, pp. 390–424.
Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: 1962; Moscow: 1975.
Price, D., Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia Univ., 1963.
Price, D., Regular laws in organization of science, Organon, 1965, No. 2, pp. 242–249.
Libkind, A.N., Markusova, V.A., Libkind, I. A., Jansz, M., and Ivanov, K.N., Modeling the Dynamics of the retentivity process of journals among the most authoritative scientific serials, Autom. Doc. Math. Ling., 2013, vol. 47, pp. 69–92.
Larivière, V., Lozano, G.A., and Gingras, A., Are elite journals declining? 2013. http://arxiv.org/ftp/papers/1.304/1.304.6460.pdf/
Kirchik, O., Gingras, Y., and Larivière, V., Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993–2010), J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 63, pp. 1411–1419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © R.S. Gilyarevskii, 2014, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2014, No. 8, pp. 1–9.
About this article
Cite this article
Gilyarevskii, R.S. Publication activity as an indicator of scientific performance. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 41, 170–177 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214030071
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688214030071