Open access foreign scientific resources and the SciGuide navigator
- 76 Downloads
This paper outlines the reasons that open access resources are required and the developmental patterns of open access models, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of open access information flows; it introduces a navigator that has been created as a tool for the use of open access resources. It also contains an analysis of statistical data about the use of this tool, including the results of surveys and interviews with the experts from one of the top research institutes of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and presents the authors’ ideas about the role of libraries in the open access movement.
Keywordsforeign scientific resources electronic publishing open access movement information resources navigator
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Budapest Open Access Initiative, Budapest: Open Society Institute, 2001. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/ read.shtml
- 2.Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory, 2010.Google Scholar
- 3.Boice, K., Open Access, Libraries and the Future of Scholarly Publishing, 2008, p. 10150. http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle
- 4.Harnad, S. and Brody, T., Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) Versus Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals, D-Lib. Magazin, 2004, p. 6. http://www. dlib.org/june04/harnad.
- 6.Bosina, L.V. and Shaburova, N.N., Analysis of Satisfaction Level of Informational Requirements of the Scientists of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science in Foreign Periodicals, Mir Nauki, Kul’tury, Obrazovaniya, 2010, no. 3, pp. 88–91.Google Scholar
- 7.Maron, N.L. and Smith, K.K., Current Model of Digital Scholarly Communication. Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka Strategic Services for the Association of Research Libraries, J. Electronic Publishing, vol.12, no. 1, p. 49. Doi 10.399998/33364551.0012.105Google Scholar
- 8.Li, Zhang., Use of Web Resources in the Journal Literature 2001 and 2007: A Cross-Disciplinary Study, College and Research Libraries, 2011, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 167–178.Google Scholar