Advertisement

Scientific and Technical Information Processing

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 398–406 | Cite as

Evaluation of the cognitive ergonomics of ontologies on the basis of graph analysis

  • T. A. Gavrilova
  • V. A. Gorovoy
  • E. S. Bolotnikova
Article

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the evaluation of ontology quality. A classification of the available evaluation of ontologies methods is given and a model for evaluation of ontology readability from the cognitive point of view is described. In addition, we propose a method for automatic evaluation of cognitive ergonomics on the basis of graph analysis.

Keywords

Ontological engineering ontology evaluation knowledge engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wertheimer, M. Productive Thinking. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1945; Moscow: Progress, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gavrilova, T. On one Approach to Ontological Engineering, Novosti Iskusstv. Intellekta, 2005, issue 3, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gavrilova, T. Gestalt Principles in Ontology Construction, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Cognitive Science, vol. 1, St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 240–242.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorovoii, V.A. Model of Classification of Evaluation of ontologies Methods, Mater. 2-i Mezhd. Molodezhn. Konf. “Iskusstv. Intellekt: Fiosofiya, Metodologiya, Innovatsii” (Proc. 2nd Int. Youth. Conf.: “Artificial Intelligence: Philosophy, Methodology and Innovations”), St. Petersburg, 15–17 November 2007, pp. 307–310.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kleshchev, A.S. and Shalfeeva, E.A. List of Ontology Properties: Principles of Catalogue Organization, Preprint of Institute for Automation and Control Processes, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 2007, p. 20Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., and Mladenic, D.A., Survey of Evaluation of ontologies Techniques. Proc. Conf. Data Mining and Data Warehouses (SiKDD 2005), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2005; hittp//kt.ijs.si/dunja/sikdd2005/Papers/BrankEvaluationSiKD/D2005.pdf.
  7. 7.
    Brewster, C., et al., Data Driven Ontology Evaluation, Proc. Int. Conf. Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., and Lehmann, J. Evaluation of ontologies and Validation. An Integrated Formal Model for the Quality Diagnostic Task, http://www.loa-cnr.it/Files/OntoEval4OntoDev-Final.pdf.
  9. 9.
    Gavrilova, T., and Gorovoy V. Technology for Ontological Engineering Lifecycle Support, Int. J. Inform. Theories Appli., 2007, vol. 14, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guarino, N. and Welty, C. Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean, Comm. ACM, 2002, vol. 45, issue 2, 61–65.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartmann, J., et al. Methods for Ontology Evaluation. Knowledge Web Deliverable Dl.2.3, 2005. http://www.starlab.vub.ac.be/research/proiects/knowledgeweb/KWeb-Del-1.2.3-Revised-v1.3.1.pdf.
  12. 12.
    Jena Semantic Web Framework homepage. http://jena.sourceforge.net/.
  13. 13.
    Lozano-Tello, A. and Gomez-Perez, A. Ontometric: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology, J. Database Mgmt., 2004, vol. 15, issue 2, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maedche A. and Staab S. Measuring Similarity between Ontologies, Proc. CIKM, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller G. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review, 1956, vol. 63, pp. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porzel R. and Malaka R.A. Task-Based Approach for Ontology Evaluation, Proc. ECAI, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spyns P. EvaLexon: Assessing Triples Mined from Texts, Technical Report 09, STAR Lab, Brussels, Belgium, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. A. Gavrilova
  • V. A. Gorovoy
  • E. S. Bolotnikova

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations