Advertisement

Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 476–488 | Cite as

A New Technique for Intelligent Constructing Exact γ-content Tolerance Limits with Expected (1 – α)-confidence on Future Outcomes in the Weibull Case Using Complete or Type II Censored Data

  • N. A. NechvalEmail author
  • K. N. Nechval
  • G. Berzins
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The logical purpose for a statistical tolerance limit is to predict future outcomes for some (say, production) process. The coverage value γ is the percentage of the future process outcomes to be captured by the prediction, and the confidence level (1 – α) is the proportion of the time we hope to capture that percentage γ. Tolerance limits of the type mentioned above are considered in this paper, which presents a new technique for constructing exact statistical (lower and upper) tolerance limits on outcomes (for example, on order statistics) in future samples. Attention is restricted to the two-parameter Weibull distribution under parametric uncertainty. The technique used here emphasizes pivotal quantities relevant for obtaining tolerance factors and is applicable whenever the statistical problem is invariant under a group of transformations that acts transitively on the parameter space. It does not require the construction of any tables and is applicable whether the experimental data are complete or Type II censored. The exact tolerance limits on order statistics associated with sampling from underlying distributions can be found easily and quickly making tables, simulation, Monte Carlo estimated percentiles, special computer programs, and approximation unnecessary. The proposed technique is based on a probability transformation and pivotal quantity averaging. It is conceptually simple and easy to use. The discussion is restricted to one-sided tolerance limits. Finally, we give numerical examples, where the proposed analytical methodology is illustrated in terms of the two-parameter Weibull distribution. Applications to other log-location-scale distributions could follow directly.

Keywords:

Future outcomes Weibull distribution parametric uncertainty type II censored data probability transformation pivotal quantity averaging exact lower tolerance limit exact upper tolerance limit 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped to improve the presentation of this paper.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Patel, J.K., Tolerance limits: A review, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methodology, 1986, vol. 15, pp. 2719–2762.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dunsmore, J.R., Some approximations for tolerance factors for the two parameter exponential distribution, Technometrics, 1978, vol. 20, pp. 317–318.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guenther, W.C., Patil, S.A., and Uppuluri, V.R.R., One-sided β-content tolerance factors for the two parameter exponential distribution, Technometrics, 1976, vol. 18, pp. 333–340.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engelhardt, M. and Bain, L.J., Tolerance limits and confidence limits on reliability for the two-parameter exponential distribution, Technometrics, 1978, vol. 20, pp. 37–39.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guenther, W.C., Tolerance intervals for univariate distributions, Naval Res. Logist. Q., 1972, vol. 19, pp. 309–333.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hahn, G.J. and Meeker, W.Q., Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nechval, K.N. and Nechval, N.A., Constructing lower simultaneous prediction limits on observations in future samples from the past data, Comput. Ind. Eng., 1999, vol. 37, pp. 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nechval, N.A. and Vasermanis, E.K., Improved Decisions in Statistics, Riga: Izglitibas soli, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nechval, N.A. and Nechval, K.N., A new approach to constructing simultaneous prediction limits on future outcomes under parametric uncertainty of underlying models, in IAENG Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Ao Sio-Long, Chan Alan Hoi-Shou, Katagiri Hideki, and Xu Li, Eds., London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nechval, N.A. and Nechval, K.N., Tolerance limits on order statistics in future samples coming from the two-parameter exponential distribution, Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., 2016, vol. 5, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., Prisyazhnyuk, S.P., and Strelchonok, V.F., Tolerance limits on order statistics in future samples coming from the Pareto distribution, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2016, vol. 50, pp. 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., and Strelchonok, V.F., A new approach to constructing tolerance limits on order statistics in future samples coming from a normal distribution, Adv. Image Video Process., 2016, vol. 4, pp. 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nechval, N.A., Berzins, G., Balina, S., Steinbuka, I., and Nechval, K.N., Constructing unbiased prediction limits on future outcomes under parametric uncertainty of underlying models via pivotal quantity averaging approach, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2017, vol. 51, pp. 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., and Berzins, G., A new technique for constructing exact tolerance limits on future outcomes under parametric uncertainty, in Advanced Mathematical Techniques in Engineering Sciences, Ram, M. and Davim, J.P., Eds., London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, pp. 203–226.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lawless, J.F., On the estimation of safe life when the underlying life distribution is Weibull, Technometrics, 1973, vol. 15, pp. 857–865.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mee, R.W. and Kushary, D., Prediction limits for the Weibull distribution utilizing simulation, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 1994, vol. 17, pp. 327–336.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fertig, K.W., Meyer, M.E., and Mann, N.R., On constructing prediction intervals from a Weibull or extreme-value distribution, Technometrics, 1980, vol. 22, pp. 567–573.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Engelhardt, M. and Bain, L.J., On prediction limits for samples from a Weibull or extreme-value distribution, Technometrics, 1982, vol. 24, pp. 147–150.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lieblein, J. and Zelen, M., Statistical investigation of the fatigue life of deep-groove ball bearing, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 1956, vol. 47, pp. 273–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mann, N.R. and Saunders, S.C., On evaluation of warranty assurance when life has a Weibull distribution, Biometrika, 1969, vol. 56, pp. 615–625.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BVEF Research Institute, University of LatviaRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Aviation Department, Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations