Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 184–197 | Cite as

Intelligent Planning Reliability-Based Inspections of Fatigued Structures for the Crack Initiation Period in the Weibull Case under Parametric Uncertainty

  • N. A. NechvalEmail author
  • G. Berzins
  • K. N. Nechval


In this paper, periodic inspections of fatigued structures, which are common practice in order to maintain their reliability above a desired minimum level, are based on the conditional reliability of the structure. It is assumed that only the functional form of the underlying distribution of time to crack initiation (when a technically detectable crack is present) is specified, but some or all of its parameters are unspecified. The new technique of intelligent planning is proposed in this paper to construct more accurate reliability-based and cost-effective inspections of fatigued structures with decreasing intervals (as alternative to constant intervals) for the crack initiation period in the Weibull case under parametric uncertainty. The technique is conceptually simple and easy to use. To illustrate the suggested technique some numerical examples are given.


fatigued structure crack initiation period weibull model parametric uncertainty reliability-based and cost-effective inspections intelligent planning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Stephens, R.I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R., and Fuchs, H.O., Metal Fatigue in Engineering, New York: John Wiley and Sons, USA, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miner, M.A., Cumulative damage in fatigue, J. Appl. Mech., 1945, vol. 12, pp. 159–164.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayoub, G., Naït-Abdelaziz, M., Zaïri, F., and Gloaguen, J.M., Multiaxial fatigue life prediction of rubber-like materials using the continuum damage mechanics approach, Procedia Eng., 2010, vol. 2, pp. 985–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nechval, K.N., Ensuring and checking reliability and survivability of aircraft structures with Weibull distribution law of fatigue durability, Doctoral (Eng.) Dissertation, Riga: Technical University of Riga, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Military Specification, Airplane Damage Tolerance Requirements, MIL-A-83444 (USAF), 1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., and Vasermanis, E.K., Statistical models for prediction of the fatigue crack growth in aircraft service, in Fatigue Damage of Materials, Varvani-Farahani, A. and Brebbia, C.A., Eds., Southampton, Boston: WIT Press, 2003, pp. 435–445.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., and Vasermanis, E.K., Estimation of warranty period for structural components of aircraft, Aviation, 2004, vol. VIII, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barlow, R.E., Hunter, L.C., and Proschan, F., Optimum checking procedures, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 1963, vol. 11, pp. 1078–1095.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luss, H. and Kander, Z., Inspection policies when duration of checkings is non-negligible, Oper. Res. Q., 1974, vol. 25, pp. 299–309.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sengupta, B., Inspection procedures when failure symptoms are delayed, Oper. Res. Q., 1977, vol. 28, pp. 768–776.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Munford, A.G. and Shahani, A.K., A nearly optimal inspection policy, Oper. Res. Q., 1972, vol. 23, pp. 373–379.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munford, A.G. and Shahani, A.K., An inspection policy for the Weibull case, Oper. Res. Q., 1973, vol. 24, pp. 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tadikamalla, P.R., An inspection policy for the gamma failure distributions, Oper. Res. Q., 1979, vol. 30, pp. 77–78.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Munford, A.G., Comparison among certain inspection policies, Manage. Sci., 1981, vol. 27, pp. 260–267.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., Berzins, G., Purgailis, M., and Rozevskis, U., Stochastic fatigue models for efficient planning inspections in service of aircraft structures, in Analytical and Stochastic Modeling Techniques and Applications, Al-Begain, K., Heindl, A., and Telek, M., Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008; Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2008, vol. 5055, pp. 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nechval, K.N., Nechval, N.A., Berzins, G., Purgailis, M., Rozevskis, U., and Strelchonok, V.F., Optimal adaptive inspection planning process in service of fatigued aircraft structures, in Analytical and Stochastic Modeling Techniques and Applications, Al-Begain, K., Fiems, D., and Horvath, G., Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009; Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2009, vol. 5513, pp. 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nechval, N.A., Nechval, K.N., and Purgailis, M., Inspection policies in service of fatigued aircraft structures, in Electrical Engineering and Applied Computing, Ao, S.I. and Gelman, L., Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011; Lect. Notes Electr. Eng., 2011, vol. 90, pp. 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nechval, N.A., Berzins, G., Purgailis, M., and Nechval, K.N., Improved estimation of state of stochastic systems via invariant embedding technique, WSEAS Trans. Math., 2008, vol. 7, pp. 141–159.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BVEF Research InstituteUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Aviation DepartmentTransport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations