Advertisement

Moscow University Physics Bulletin

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 211–215 | Cite as

The Influence of the McCumber Parameter on Parametric Amplification of High-Frequency Radiation by Josephson Junctions

  • V. Ch. ZhukovskiiEmail author
  • O. D. Pozdnyakova
  • V. D. Krevchik
  • M. B. Semenov
  • A. V. Shorokhov
Condensed Matter Physics
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The influence of the internal capacity of a Josephson junction on the parametric amplification of external electromagnetic radiation was studied in terms of a resistively and capacitively shunted junction model. The influence of the McCumber parameter on parametric amplification was clarified. It is shown that the additional regions of amplification can occur near subharmonic Shapiro steps in the case of Josephson junctions with internal capacity.

Keywords

Josephson junction resistively shunted junction model parametric amplification McCumber parameter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. D. Josephson, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962). doi 10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. G. Aslamazov and A. I. Larkin, JETP Lett. 9, 87 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. E. McCumber, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3113 (1968). doi 10.1063/1.1656743ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. N. Vystavkin, V. N. Gubankov, L. S. Kuz’min, et al., Radiotekh. Elektron. 17, 896 (1971).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. N. Vystavkin, V. N. Gubankov, G. F. Leshchenko, et al., Radiotekh. Elektron. 15, 2404 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. T. Ulrich and M. T. Levinsen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 26, 131 (1975). doi 10.1063/1.88073ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Kanter and F. L. Vernon, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 3174 (1972). doi 10.1063/1.1661682ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. D. Thompson, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5587 (1973). doi 10.1063/1.1662201ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Auracher and T. Van Duzer, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 848 (1973). doi 10.1063/1.1662270ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. N. Vystavkin, V. N. Gubankov, L. S. Kuz’min, K. K. Likharev, V. V. Migulin, and A. N. Spitsyn, JETP Lett. 17, 204 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Kanter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 23, 350 (1973). doi 10.1063/1.1654915ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Song, F. Muller, T. Scheller, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 142506 (2011). doi 10.1063/1.3576910ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Tachiki, K. Ivanovic, K. Kadowaki, and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. B 83, 014508 (2011). doi 10.1103/Phys-RevB.83.014508ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 80 (1963). doi 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.80ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. W. Anderson and A. H. Dayem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 195 (1964). doi 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.195ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. A. Hamilton and E. G. Johnson, Jr., Phys. Lett. A 41, 393 (1972). doi 10.1016/0375-9601(72)90945-0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. K. Tien and J. P. Gordon, Phys. Rev. 129, 647 (1963). doi 10.1103/PhysRev.129.647ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. R. Tucker and M. J. Feldman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 1055 (1985). doi 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.1055ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. E. Hasselberg, M. T. Levinsen, and M. R. Samuelsen, Rev. Phys. Appl. 9, 157 (1974). doi 10.1051/rphysap: 0197400901015700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. E. Gregers-Hansen and G. R. Pickett, Rev. Phys. Appl. 9, 145 (1974). doi 10.1051/rphysap: 0197400901014500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L.-E. Hasselberg, M. T. Levinsen, and M. R. Samuelsen, J. Low Temp. Phys. 21, 567 (1975). doi 10.1007/BF01141611ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Seidel, M. Siegel, and E. Heinz, Phys. C 180, 284 (1991). doi 10.1016/0921-4534(91)90682-OADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Darula, T. Doderer, and S. Beuven, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 12, R1 (1999). doi 10.1088/0953-2048/12/1/001ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Filatrella, N. F. Pedersen, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2513 (2000). doi 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2513ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. A. Acebron, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. Perez Vicente, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137 (2005). doi 10.1103/RevMod-Phys.77.137ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. K. Jain, K. K. Likharev, J. E. Lukens, and J. E. Sauvageau, Phys. Rep. 109, 309 (1984). doi 10.1016/0370-1573(84)90002-4ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Ch. Zhukovskii
    • 1
    Email author
  • O. D. Pozdnyakova
    • 2
  • V. D. Krevchik
    • 3
  • M. B. Semenov
    • 3
  • A. V. Shorokhov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Physics and ChemistryNational Research Mordovia State UniversitySaranskRussia
  3. 3.Faculty of Instrument Engineering, Information Systems, and TechnologiesPenza State UniversityPenzaRussia

Personalised recommendations