Mechanics of Solids

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 334–341 | Cite as

Exact statement of the instability problem for frames and its direct numerical solution

  • M. CachoEmail author
  • P. M. López-Reyes
  • A. Lorenzana


A general approach for the systematic evaluation of the critical buckling load and the determination of the buckling mode is presented. The Navier-Bernoulli beam model is considered, having the possibility of variable cross-section under any type of load (including pressures and thermal loading). With this purpose, the equilibrium equations of each beam element in its deformed configuration under the hypothesis of infinitesimal strains and displacements is considered, resulting in a system of differential equations with variable coefficients for each element. To obtain the nonlinear response of the frame, one should impose the compatibility of displacements and the equilibrium of forces and moments in each beam-end, also in the deformed configuration. The solution is obtained by requiring that the total variation of potential energy is zero at the instant of buckling. The objective of this work is to develop a systematic method to determine the critical buckling load and the bucklingmode of any frame without using the common simplifications usually assumed in matrix analysis or finite element approaches. This way, precise results can be obtained regardless of the discretization done.


critical buckling load buckling mode variable inertia thermal loading 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Chajes, Principles of Structural Stability Theory ((Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Timoshenko, Theory of Elastic Stability (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Crisfield, Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures. Vol.1: Essentials (JohnWiley & Sons, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Koiter, “On the Principle of Stationary Complementary Energy in the Nonlinear Theory of Elasticity,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 25(3), 424–434 (1973).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Machado, “Non-Linear Buckling and Postbuckling Behavior of Thin-Walled Beams Considering Shear Deformation,” Int. J. Non-Lin.Mech. 43, 345–365 (2008).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Simitses and D. Hodges, Fundamentals of Structural Stability (Elsevier Inc., Massachusetts, 2006).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Marsden and T. Hughes, Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity (Dover Publications, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Burden and J. Faires, Numerical Analysis (Thomson, Mexico, 1998).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Fertis, Nonlinear Structural Engineering (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. A. Gulyaev, A. A. Zagordan, and V. I. Shalashilin, “Some Nonconventional Buckling Problems for a Beam under Transverse Loads,” Izv. Akad. Nauk. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 2, 111–117 (2006) [Mech. Solids (Engl. Transl.) 41 (2), 87–92 (2006)].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    COSMOS/M, v.2.95 (Structural Research and Analysis Corp., Los Angeles, 2006).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. A. Postnov and G. A. Tumashik, “Stability Optimization of a Cantilever Beam Subjected to a Non-Conservative Compressive Force,” Izv. Akad. Nauk. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 2, 93–103 (2006) [Mech. Solids (Engl. Transl.) 41 (2), 72–80 (2006)].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Chen and G. E. Blandford, “Work-Increment-Control Method for Non-Linear Analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 36, 909–930 (1993).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITAPUniversity of ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.CARTIF Centro TecnológicoValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations