Advertisement

Comparison of Data Representation Languages in the Structure–Activity Problem

  • S. M. GusakovaEmail author
  • D. A. DobrininEmail author
  • N. V. KharchevnikovaEmail author
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses two languages for representation of chemical structures and carries out their comparative analysis for the prediction of biological activity using an intelligent JSM-system. The comparison is carried out on three data arrays in terms of the group of parameters.

Keywords:

chemical compound biological activity data representation language JSM system simple method with counterexamples forbidden 

Notes

FUNDING

This work was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research no. 17-07-00539.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Finn, V.K., Epistemic foundations of the JSM method automatic hypothesis generation, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2014, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 96–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avidon, V.V. and Pomerantsev, A.B., Structure-activity relationship oriented languages for chemical structure representation, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1982, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blinova, V.G. and Dobrynin, D.A., Structure representation languages in intelligent drug-design systems, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2000, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Filimonov, D.A., Lagunin, A.A., Gloriozova, T.A., Rudik, A.V., Druzhilovskii, D.S., Pogodin, P.V., and Poroikov, V.V., Prediction of the biological activity spectra of organic compounds using PASS ONLINE web resource, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 2014, no. 3, pp. 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arskii, Yu.M. and Finn, V.K., The principles of designing intelligent systems, Inf. Tekhnol. Vychisl. Sist., 2008, no. 4, pp. 4–37.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gusakova, S.M. and Finn, V.K., Similarity and plausible conclusion, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Tekh. Kibern., 1987, no. 5, pp. 42–63.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kharchevnikova, N.V., Blinova, V.G., Dobrynin, D.A., and Zhurkov, V.S., The use of an intelligent JSM system to analyze the relationship between the structure of nitro-substituted benzenes and their mutagenic activity in the Ames test, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 2, 2015, no.3, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kharchevnikova, N.V., Blinova, V.G., and Dobry-nin, D.A., Comparison of various research models for the “structure–asthma activity” relationship, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 2, 2016, no. 2, pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blinova, V.G., Dobrynin, D.A., Maksin, M.V., Zholdakova, Z.I., and Kharchevnikova, N.V., Carcinogenicity forecasting for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the quantum-chemical module for metabolite generation in a JSM system, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2003, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Russian State University for the HumanitiesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations