Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is one of unmatched scale and severity. A continued state of crisis has been met with poor public adherence to preventive measures and difficulty implementing public health policy. This study aims to identify and evaluate the factors underlying such a response. Thus, it assesses the knowledge, perceived risk, and trust in the sources of information in relation to the novel coronavirus disease at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. An online questionnaire was completed between March 20 and 27, 2020. Knowledge, perceptions, and perceived risk (Likert scale) were assessed for 737 literate participants of a representative sample in an urban setting. We found that respondents’ risk perception for novel coronavirus disease was high. The perceived risk score for both cognitive and affective domains was raised at 2.24 ± 1.3 (eight items) and 3.01 ± 1 (seven items) respectively. Misconceptions and gaps in knowledge regarding COVID-19 were noted. Religious leadership was the least trusted (10%) while health authorities were the most trusted (35%) sources of information. Our findings suggest that there was a deficiency in knowledge and high concern about the pandemic, leading to a higher risk perception, especially in the affective domain. Thus, we recommend comprehensive education programs, planned intensive risk communication, and a concerted effort by all stakeholders to mitigate the spread of disease. The first of its kind in the region, this study will be critical to response efforts against current and future outbreaks.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Word Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed March 11, 2020).
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID- 2019) situation reports. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200324-sitrep-64-covid-19.pdf ?sfvrsn=723b221e_2 (accessed April 3, 2020).
Government of Pakistan Covid 19 Dashboard. Pakistan cases details. 2020. Available from: http://covid.gov.pk/stats/pakistan (accessed April 3, 2020).
Noreen N, Siddiqui SW, Niazi SUK, Khudaidad F, Khan NU, Dil S, et al. COVID-19 Outbreak in Pakistan; a Situational Analysis. J Emerg Dis Virol 2020;5.
Covid.gov.pk. COVID-19 Health Advisory Platform by Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination Dial 1166 health helpline CHAT BOT GUIDELINES PREVENTION FACILITIES PUBLIC SERVICE MESSAGE HOME / PAKISTAN CASES DETAILS PUNJAB COVID-19 Health Advisory [Internet]. 2020, pp. 1–4. Available from: http://covid.gov.pk/ stats/pakistan (accessed August 3, 2020).
Faasse K, Newby JM. Public perceptions of COVID-19 in Australia: perceived risk, knowledge, health-protective behaviours, and vaccine intentions. medRxiv 2020.
Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatr 2020;33;e100213.
Person B, Sy F, Holton K, Govert B, Liang A, Garza B, et al. Fear and stigma: the epidemic within the SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10;358–63.
Pakistan Today. Covid second-wave? 2020. Available from: https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/10/09/covid-second-wave/ (accessed October 9, 2020).
Reuben RC, Danladi MMA, Saleh DA, Ejembi PE. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: an epidemiological survey in North-Central Nigeria. J Community Health 2020;1–14.
Kim S, Kim S. Exploring the determinants of perceived risk of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15;1168.
Choi DH, Yoo W, Noh GY, Park K. The impact of social media on risk perceptions during the MERS outbreak in South Korea. Comput Human Behav 2017;72;422–31.
Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Recchia G, van der Bles AM, et al. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res 2020;23;994–1006.
World Health Organization. Perceiving risks. Chapter 3. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002, pp. 27–45.
Paek HJ, Hove T. Risk perceptions and risk characteristics. Oxford Res Encyclopedia Commun 2017;1–16.
Wheaton MG, Abramowitz JS, Berman NC, Fabricant LE, Olatunji BO. Psychological predictors of anxiety in response to the H1N1 (Swine Flu) Pandemic. Cogn Ther Res 2012;36;210–18.
Dodds W. Disease now and potential future pandemics. In: The world’s worst problems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019, pp. 31–44.
Rehman A, Jingdong L, Hussain I. The province-wise literacy rate in Pakistan and its impact on economy. Pac Sci Rev B 2015;1;140–4.
McFadden SM, Malik AA, Aguolu OG, Willebrand KS, Omer SB. Perceptions of the adult US population regarding the novel coronavirus outbreak. PLoS One 2020;15;e0231808.
Rayhan RU, Zheng Y, Uddin E, Timbol C, Adewuyi O, Baraniuk JN. Administer and collect medical questionnaires with Google documents: a simple, safe, and free system. Appl Med Inform 2013;33;12–21.
Mumtaz S, Zahra T. Role-play as a learning modality in Pakistan. Clin Teach 2016;13;124–9.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Provisional summary results of 6th population and housing census-2017. 2020. Available from: http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/provisional-summary-results-6th-population-and-housing-census-2017-0 (accessed July 2020).
Medical cases in Pakistan. Template: COVID-19 pandemic data/ Pakistan medical cases. 2020. Available from: https://en.wikipe-dia.org/wiki/Template:COVID-19_pandemic_data/Pakistan_ medical_cases (accessed August 3, 2020).
Barati F, Pouresmaieli M, Ekrami E, Asghari S, Ziarani FR, Mamoudifard M. Potential drugs and remedies for the treatment of COVID-19: a critical review. Biol Proced Online 2020;22;15.
John Hopkins School of Public Health. COVID-19 myths vs. realities. 2020. Available from: https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/arti-cles/coronavirus-facts-vs-myths.html (accessed April 3, 2020).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Over-the-counter drug products containing colloidal silver ingredients or silver salts. Final rule. Fed Regist 1999;64;44653–8.
Chung IS, Lee MY, Shin DH, Jung HR. Three systemic argyria cases after ingestion of colloidal silver solution. Int J Dermatol 2010;49;1175–7.
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Myth busters. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters (accessed April 3, 2020).
Luo W, Majumder MS, Liu D, Poirier C, Mandl KD, Lipsitch M, et al. The role of absolute humidity on transmission rates of the COVID-19 outbreak. MedRxiv 2020.
Covid.gov.pk. COVID-19 Health Advisory Platform by Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination Dial 1166 health helpline CHAT BOT GUIDELINES PREVENTION FACILITIES PUBLIC SERVICE MESSAGE HOME / PAKISTAN CASES DETAILS PUNJAB COVID-19 Health Advisory [Internet]. 2020, pp. 1–4. Available from: http://covid.gov.pk/ stats/pakistan (accessed July 7, 2020).
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: when and how to use masks (Last updated June 19, 2020). 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks (accessed June 27, 2020).
Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. JAMA 2020; 323;1406–7.
Teasdale E, Santer M, Geraghty AWA, Little P, Yardley L. Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of respiratory infection: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health 2014;14;589.
van der Linden S. On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: the case of climate change. Eur J Soc Psychol 2014;44;430–40.
Grupe DW, Nitschke JB. Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14;488–501.
Rowe AD, Fitness J. Understanding the role of negative emotions in adult learning and achievement: a social functional perspective. Behav Sci (Basel) 2018;8;27.
Abdulkareem SA, Augustijn EW, Filatova T, Musial K, Mustafa YT. Risk perception and behavioural change during epidemics: comparing models of individual and collective learning. PLoS One 2020;15;e0226483.
Tsen MH. Study on risk perception of Not-In-My-Back-Yard. People Land 1994;122;36–40.
Tam CWC, Pang EPF, Lam LCW, Chiu HFK. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers. Psychol Med 2004;34;1197–204.
Janssen E, Verduyn P, Waters EA. Don’t know responses to cognitive and affective risk perception measures: exploring prevalence and socio-demographic moderators. Br J Health Psychol 2018;23;407–19.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382;1708–20.
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323; 1239–42.
Zajonc RB. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol 1980;35;151–75.
Janssen E, van Osch L, Lechner L, Candel M, de Vries H. Thinking versus feeling: differentiating between cognitive and affective components of perceived cancer risk. Psychol Health 2012;27;767–83.
Wiedemann PM, Schütz H. [Risk perception and risk communication in environmental medicine]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 1997;91;31–42 [Article in German].
Gao J, Zheng P, Jia Y, Chen H, Mao Y, Chen S, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One 2020;15;e0231924.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgments of and by representativeness. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982, pp. 84–98.
Petrie KJ, Faasse K, Thomas MG. Public perceptions and knowledge of the ebola virus, willingness to vaccinate, and likely behavioral responses to an outbreak. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2016;10;674–80.
Bish A, Michie S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. Br J Health Psychol 2010;15;797–824.
Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G, Roth C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal 2000;20;353–62.
Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Anal 1993;13;675–82.
Jacobs J, Taylor M, Agho K, Stevens G, Barr M, Raphael B. Factors associated with increased risk perception of pandemic influenza in Australia. Influenza Res Treat 2010; 2010:947906.
The New York Times. ‘God will protect us’: coronavirus spreads through an already struggling Pakistan. 2020. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/world/asia/pakistan-coronavirus-tablighi-jamaat.html (accessed April 3, 2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Data availability statement: The comprehensive data for the study titled “Assessment of the knowledge, perceptions and perceived risk concerning COVID-19 in Pakistan is provided in form of tables within the manuscript. Any additional data is required that will be provided by the authors when asked.
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
About this article
Cite this article
Haque, A., Mumtaz, S., Mumtaz, R. et al. Assessment of Knowledge, Perceptions and Perceived Risk Concerning COVID-19 in Pakistan. J Epidemiol Glob Health 11, 186–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.210109.001
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.210109.001