Abstract
Growth and development in middle- and low-income countries often come at an environmental cost, but is that trade-off always necessary? This study uses a computable general equilibrium model to estimate the macroeconomic and environmental impact of the world’s most significant plurilateral trade agreement, the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). We build a novel dataset using the Global Trade Analysis Project data, which allows us to estimate the effect on emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), non-CO2, and other pollutants. In terms of macroeconomic impact, African nations benefit from gross domestic product growth by 1.2% and employment by 2.1%, with less developed economies, such as Togo and Benin, obtaining the largest macroeconomic gains from trade liberalization. On aggregate, we estimate that the agreement will lead to a marginal, 0.3% increase in CO2 emissions, a 19.6% increase in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions, and a 21.5% decline in air pollutants. We find considerable heterogeneity across countries. For Nigeria, the rest of Central Africa, and South-Central Africa, the AfCFTA is expected to reduce emissions, while in Ethiopia, Cameroon, and Burkina Faso, estimations show an increase. Transit countries connected to large ports, such as Togo and Benin, are most negatively impacted. We conclude that while the AfCFTA implementation is expected to lead to notable improvements in air quality by reducing air pollutants, the resulting increase in climate-related emissions may require member countries to make concerted efforts to deal with the adverse effects.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrego L., Amado M.A., Gursoy T., Nicholls G.P., Perez-Saiz H., 2019. The African Continental Free Trade Agreement: Welfare Gains Estimates from a General Equilibrium Model, IMF Working Paper 19/124, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
African Development Bank, 2019. Integration for Africa’s Economic Prosperity, African Development Bank Group, Côte d’Ivoire. Available from: https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/2019AEO/AEO_2019-EN-CHAP3.pdf.
Baghdadi L., Martinez-Zarzoso I., Zitouna, H., 2013. Are RTA agreements with environmental provisions reducing emissions? J. Int. Econ. 90, 378–390.
Beyene S.D., Kotosz B., 2020. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: an empirical study for East African countries, Int. J. Environ. Stud. 77, 636–654.
Chauvin N.D., Ramos M.P., Porto G., 2016. Trade, Growth, and Welfare Impacts of the CFTA in Africa. Available from: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=CSAE2017&paper_id=749.
Chidede T., 2020. Leveraging the AfCFTA as an investment incentive for Africa. Available from: https://www.tralac.org/documents/events/tralac/4096-2020-annual-conference-two-pager-chidede-leveraging-the-afcfta-as-an-investment-incentive-for-africa/file.html.
Chepeliev M., 2020a. Development of the Air Pollution Database for the GTAP 10A Data Base, GTAP Research Memorandum No. 33, pp. 1–40.
Chepeliev M., 2020b. Development of the non-CO2 GHG Emissions Database for the GTAP 10A Data Base, GTAP Research Memorandum No. 32, pp. 1–25.
Cherniwchan J., 2017. Trade liberalization and the environment: evidence from NAFTA and U.S. manufacturing, J. Int. Econ. 105, 130–149.
Frankel J.A., Rose A.K., 2005. Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality, Rev. Econ. Stat. 87, 85–91.
Gumilang H., Mukhopadhyay K., Thomassin P.J., 2011. Economic and environmental impacts of trade liberalization: the case of Indonesia, Econ. Modell. 28, 1030–1041.
Glomsrød S., Vennemo H., Johnsen T., 1992. Stabilization of emissions of CO2: a computable general equilibrium assessment, Scand. J. Econ. 94, 53–69.
Hertel T.W., 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
IMF 2020a. The African Continental Free Trade Area: Potential Economic Impact and Challenges, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
IMF 2020b. Policy Responses to Covid-19, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.
Mevel S., Karingi S., 2012. Deepening Regional Integration in Africa: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment of the Establishment of a Continental Free Trade Area Followed by a Continental Customs Union, Paper presented at 7th African Economic Conference, Kigali, Rwanda. Available from: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=3900.
Oh I., Yoo W.J., Yoo Y., 2019. Impact and interactions of policies for mitigation of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions in Korea, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 1161.
Osabuohien E., Efobi U.R., Gitau C.M., 2015. Environment challenges in Africa: further dimensions to the trade, MNCs and energy debate, Manage. Environ. Qual. 26, 118–137.
Peterson E.B., 2019. Incorporating unemployment into the GTAP model, J. Glob. Econ. Anal. 4, 67–107.
Sandrey R., Jensen H.G., 2015. The continental free trade area – a GTAP assessment, Tralac Trade Law Centre, Stellenbosch. Available from: https://www.tralac.org/publications/article/7287-the-continental-free-trade-area-a-gtap-assessment.html.
Saygili M., Peters R., Knebel C., 2018. African Continental Free Trade Area: Challenges and Opportunities of Tariff Reductions, UNCTAD Research Paper No. 15, UNCTAD/SER.RP/2017/15. Available from: https://www.wcoesarocb.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/UNCTAD-AfCFTA-Challenges-and-Oppportunities-of-Tariff-Reductions.pdf.
Tongwane M.I., Moeletsi M.E., 2018. A review of greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector in Africa, Agric. Syst. 166, 124–134.
Vanzetti D., Peters R., Knebel C., 2018. Non-tariff measures: lifting CFTA and ACP trade to the next level, UNCTAD Research Paper No. 14, UNCTAD/SER.RP/2017/14. Available from: https://www.tralac.org/images/docs/12675/non-tariff-measures-lifting-cfta-and-acp-trade-to-the-next-level-unctad-research-paper-february-2018.pdf.
World Bank, 2020. The African Continental Free Trade Area : Economic and Distributional Effects, World Bank, Washington, D.C. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34139 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Xu Y., Masui T., 2009. Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: application of AIM/CGE model to China, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 198, 315–325.
Yao X., Yasmeen R., Li Y., Hafeez M., Padda I.U.H., 2019. Free trade agreements and environment for sustainable development: a gravity model analysis, Sustainability 11, 597.
Zhou L., Tian X., Zhou Z., 2017. The effects of environmental provisions in RTAs on PM 2.5 air pollution, Appl. Econ. 49, 2630–2641.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Peer review under responsibility of the African Export-Import Bank
Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [BN], upon reasonable request.
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
About this article
Cite this article
Bengoa, M., Mathur, S., Narayanan, B. et al. Environmental Effects of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement: A Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach. J Afr Trade 8 (Suppl 2), 36–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.210719.001
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.210719.001