Skip to main content
Log in

How lonely they are? A degree of isolation among macrozoobenthos species in the Marine Protected Area, the Bay of Puck, the Southern Baltic

  • Original research paper
  • Published:
Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies

Abstract

Extensive sampling (450 grabs) was performed all over the inner part of Puck Bay (105 km2 area) in summers of 2007–2009. The GIS-based analysis of samples was performed to assess in detail the distribution of 32 benthic species. The minimum area of occurrence was less than 1 km2 for Lekanosphaera rugicauda and the maximum was 83 km2 for Cerastoderma glaucum. The material reveals that species with the pelagic larval stage were most widespread, with the least distance between individuals and the highest average density (e.g. Cerastoderma glaucum, Hydrobia ventrosa). The most isolated and the least dense species within the studied area were discretely mobile, non-larval crustaceans (e.g. Gammarus oceanicus and Lekanosphaera rugicauda), present at single sites with the largest distance from each other. We conclude that analysis of species distribution helps in understanding the threats to populations of marine invertebrates and marine spatial planning, through locating the isolated species and populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agardy T. (2000). Information needs for marine protected areas: scientific and societal. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66, 875–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agardy T., Bridgewater P., Crosby M.P., Day J., Dayton P.K., Kenchington R., Laffoley D., McConney P., Murray P. A., Parks J.E. & Peau L. (2003). Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 13, 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrulewicz E., Otręba Z., Węsławski J.M. & Kamińska K. (2012). Disturbances of physical properties of marines pace related to large — scale technical installations. Implications for ecosystem-based management in the Baltic Sea. Marine Management, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley R. & Turner R. (2005). Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software. 12, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JJ. & Okamura B. (2005). Low genetic diversity in a marine nature reserve: reevaluating diversity criteria in reserve design. Proc. Royal Soc. B, 272, 1067–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boero F. & Bonsdorff E. (2007). A conceptual framework for marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Marine Ecology. 28, 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma de P. & Parrish J.K. (1999). Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics. 31, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bologna P.A.X. & Heck, K.L. (2002). Impact of Habitat Edges on Density and Secondary Production of Seagrass-associated Fauna. Estuaries. 25(5), 1033–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsdorff E. (2006). Zoobenthos diversity gradients in the Baltic sea: Continuous post-glacial succession in a stressed ecosystem. Journal of Exp. Marine Biol. And Ecol. 330, 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsdorff E. & Pearson T. (1999). Variation in the sublittoral macrozoobenthos of the Baltic sea along environmental gradients: a functional group approach. Australian Journal of Ecology. 24, 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom C. & Bonsdorff E. (1997). Community structure and spatial variation of benthic invertebrates associated with Zostera marina (L.) beds in the northern Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research. 37, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.H. (1984). On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. The American Naturalist. 124, 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulvy N.K., Sadovy Y. & Reynolds J.D. (2003). Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish and Fisheries. 4, 25–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziubińska A. (2011). PhD dissertation, University of Gdansk, unpublished manuscript

  • Elmgren, R. & C. Hill. (1997). Ecosystem function at low biodiversity — the Baltic example. In: Marine Biodiversity. Patterns and Processes. Ormond, R.F.G., Gage, J.D. and Angel, M.V. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 319–336.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gic Grusza G., Urbański J., Warzocha J. & Węsławski J.M. (2009). Atlas of marine seabed habitats of Polish Marine Areas. IOPAN, Sopot, 180 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glockzin M. & Zettler M.L. (2008). Spatial macrozoobenthic distribution patterns in relation to major environmental factors — A case study from the Pomeranian Bay (southern Baltic Sea). Journal of Sea Research. 59, 144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray J.S. (2002). Species richness of marine soft sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 244, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzelak K. & Kuklinski P. (2010). Benthic assemblages associated with rocks in a brackish environment of the southernBaltic Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 90, 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey D. & Hovel K.A. (2004). Seagrass bed patchiness: effects on epifaunal communities in San Diego Bay, USA. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 313, 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2011). Report of the Workshop on the Science for area-based management: Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning in practice (WKCMSP). 1–4 November 2010, Lisbon, Portugal. ICES CM 2011/SSGHIE:01. 25 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Janas, U., Zarzycki, T. & Kozik, P. (2004). Palaemon elegans — a new component of the Gulf of Gdańsk macrofauna. Oceanologia. 46, 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jazdzewski K. (1973). Ecology of gammarids in the Bay of Puck. Oikos, suppl. 15: 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeczmien W. & Szaniawska A. (2000). Quantitative studies on Gammarus Fabr. genus in Puck Bay (the Baltic Sea). Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii. 47(3–4), 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine A.O. (2003). Distribution of soft-bottom macrofauna in the deep open Baltic Sea in relation to environmental variability. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 57, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen van A., De Roos A.M. & Persson L.(2008). How cod shapes its world. Journal of Sea Research. 60, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan D.R. (1991). Influence of body size and population density on fertilization success and reproductive output in a free spawning invertebrate. Biological Bull.(Woods Hole). 181, 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokievsky V.O. (2009). Marine protected areas: theoretical background for design and operation. Russian Journal of Marine Biology. 35, 504–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers R.A., Barrowman N.J., Hutching J.A. & Rosenberg A.A. (1995). Population dynamics of exploited fish stocks at low population levels. Science. 52227, 1106–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norse E.A. & Crowder L.B. (2005). Marine Conservation Biology. Island Press; Washington, Covelo, London, 470 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osowiecki A. (1998). Macrozoobenthos distribution in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Gdansk — autumn 1994 and summer 1995. Oceanological Studies. 27, 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitgas, P. (1998). Biomass-dependent dynamics of fish spatial distributions characterized by geostatistical aggregation curves. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 55, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pliński M. & Florczyk I. (1984). Changes in the phytobenthos resulting from the eutrophication of the Puck Bay. Limnologica (Berlin). 15, 325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powles H., Bradford M.J., Bradford R.G., Doubleday W.G., Innes S. & Levings C.D. (2000). Assessing and protecting endangered marine species. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 57, 669–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins B.D. & Bell S.S. (1994). Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 9, 301–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D.A. & Poore A.G.B. (2005). Habitat configuration affects colonization of epifauna in a marine algal bed. Biological conservation. 127, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skov H., Durinck J., Leopold M.F. & Tasker M.L. (2007). A quantitative method for evaluating the importance of marine areas for conservation of birds. Biological conservation. 136, 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoła Z. (2012). MSc dissertation, University of Gdansk

  • Sumaila U.R. (2002). Marine protected area performance in a model of the fishery. Natural Resource Modelling. 15, 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymelfenig M., Kotwicki L. & Graca B. (2006). Benthic recolonization in post dredging pits in the Puck Bay (Southern Baltic). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 68, 489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzvetkova, N. L. (1975). Coastal gammarids of the northern and Far Eastern seas of the USSR and adjacent waters. Genera Gammarus, Marinogammarus, Anisogammarus, Mesogammarus (Amphipoda, Gammaridae). Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein R.W. & Curran M.C. (1986). Colonisation of artificial seagrass versus time and distance from source. Marine Ecol. Progress Ser. 29, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warzocha J. (1995). Classification and structure of of macrofaunal communities in the souhern Baltic. Arch. Fish. Mar. Res. 42, 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weslawski J.M., Urbanski J., Kryla-Straszewska L., Andrulewicz E., Linkowski T., Kuzebski E., Meissner W, Otremba Z & Piwowarczyk J. (2010). The different uses of sea space in Polish Marine Areas: is conflict inevitable? Oceanologia. 52, 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weslawski J.M., Warzocha J., Wiktor J., Urbanski J., Radtke K., Kryla L., Tatarek A., Kotwicki L. & Piwowarczyk J. (2009). Biological valorisation of the southern Baltic Sea (Polish Exclusive Economic Zone). Oceanologia. 51, 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M., Weslawski J.M., Warzocha J. & Janas U. (2010). Habitat loss and possible effects on local species richness in a speciespoor system — a case study of southern Baltic. Biodivers Conserv. 19, 3991–4002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B., Lotze H.K. & Sommer U. (2001). Algal propagule banks modify competition, consumer and resource control on Baltic rocky shores. Oecologia. 128, 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zschokke S., Dolt C., Rusterholz H., Oggier C., Braschler B., Thommen G.H., Ludin E., Erhardt A. & Baur B. (2000). Short term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia. 125, 559–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Marcin Węsławski.

About this article

Cite this article

Węsławski, J.M., Kryla-Straszewska, L., Warzocha, J. et al. How lonely they are? A degree of isolation among macrozoobenthos species in the Marine Protected Area, the Bay of Puck, the Southern Baltic. Ocean and Hydro 42, 289–295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13545-013-0085-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13545-013-0085-8

Key words

Navigation