Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing stereotypes of creating graphical user interfaces

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Computer Science

Abstract

A graphical user interface (GUI, UI) is an important part of an application, with which users interact directly. It should be implemented in the best way with respect to understandability. If a user does not understand the terms in the UI, he or she cannot work with it; then the whole system is worthless. In order to serve well the UI should contain domain-specific terms and describe domain-specific processes. It is the primary source for domain analysis right after domain users and experts. Our general goal is to propose a method for an automatic domain analysis of user interfaces. First, however, the basic principles and stereotypes must be defined that are used when creating user interfaces and rules must be derived for creating an information extracting algorithm. In this paper these stereotypes are listed and analyzed and a set of rules for extracting domain information is created. A taxonomy of UIs and a taxonomy of components based on their domain-specific information is also proposed. Our DEAL method for extracting this information is outlined and a prototype of DEAL is presented. Also our goals for the future are listed: expanding the prototype for different components and different types of UIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antkiewicz M., Czarnecki K., FeaturePlugin: feature modeling plug-in for Eclipse, In: Proceedings of the 2004 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bačíková M., Porubän J., Defining computer languages via user interfaces (Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Electrotechnical Engineering and Informatics, 2010)

  3. Bačíková M., Porubän J., Automating User Actions on GUI: Defining a GUI Domain-Specific Language, In: Proceedings of International Scientific conference on Computer Science and Engineering, 60–67, 2010

  4. Bačíková M., Porubän J., Lakatoš D., Introduction to Domain Analysis of Web User Interfaces, In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Informatics, INFORMATICS’2011, 115–120, 2011

  5. Bak K., Czarnecki K., Wasowski A., Feature and meta-models in Clafer: mixed, specialized, and coupled, In: Proceedings of the Third international conference on Software language engineering (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czarnecki K., Antkiewicz M., Kim, Ch.H.P., Lau S., Pietroszek K., fmp and fmp2rsm: eclipse plug-ins for modeling features using model templates, In: Companion to the 20th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czarnecki K., Bednasch T., Unger P., Eisenecker U.W., Generative Programming for Embedded Software: An Industrial Experience Report, In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGPLAN/SIGSOFT conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Díaz Rubén P., Reuse Library Process Model. Final Report (Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Command, USAF, Hanscomb AFB, MA, USA, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler M., Domain-Specific Languages (Addison-Wesley Signature Series (Fowler)) (Addison-Wesley Professional, 2010)

  10. Frakes W., Prieto-Diaz R., Fox Ch., DARE: Domain analysis and reuse environment, Ann. Softw. Eng., 5, 125–141, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heineman G.T., Councill W.T., Component-based software engineering: putting the pieces together (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeff Gray J. et al, Domain-Specific Modeling, In: CRC Handbook of Dynamic System Modeling (CRC Press, 2007)

  13. Kang K.C., Cohen S.G., Hess J.A., Novak W.E., Peterson A.S., Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study (Carnegie-Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, 1990)

  14. Kiczales G. et al., Aspect-Oriented Programming, 220–242 (Springer-Verlag, 1997)

  15. Kosar, Tomaž et al., Comparing General-Purpose and Domain-Specific Languages: An Empirical Study, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., 2, 247–264, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kösters G., Six H.W., Voss J., Combined Analysis of User Interface and Domain Requirements, In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE’ 96), 1996

  17. Leich T., Apel S., Marnitz L., Saake G., Tool support for feature-oriented software development: featureIDE: an Eclipse-based approach, In: Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA workshop on Eclipse technology eXchange, (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lisboa L., Garcia V., de Almeida E., Meira S., ToolDAy: a tool for domain analysis, Int. J. Softw. Tool. Tec. Trans., 13, 337–353 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mernik M., Heering J., Sloane A.M., When and how to develop domain-specific languages, ACM Comput. Surv., 37, 316–344, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moon M., Yeom K., Seok Chae H., An Approach to Developing Domain Requirements as a Core Asset Based on Commonality and Variability Analysis in a Product Line, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 31, 551–569, 19, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore M.M., Rugaber S., Domain Analysis for Transformational Reuse, In: Proceedings of the Fourth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE’ 97) (Washington, DC, USA, 1997)

  22. Neighbors J.M., Software construction using components (University of California, Irvine, USA, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neighbors J.M., The Draco approach to constructing software from reusable components, In: Readings in artificial intelligence and software engineering (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhartz-Berger I., Sturm A., Selected Readings on Database Technologies And Applications, In: Information Science Reference — Imprint of: IGI Publishing (Hershey, PA, USA, 2008)

  25. Ristic S., Aleksic S., Lukovic I., Banovic J., Form-Driven Application Generation: A Case Study, In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Informatics, INFORMATICS’2011, 115–120, 2011

  26. Schmidt C.D., Guest Editor’s Introduction: Model-Driven Engineering, Computer, 39, 25–31, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thum T., Batory D., Kastner Ch., Reasoning about edits to feature models, In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thum T., Kastner Ch., Erdweg S., Siegmund N., Abstract Features in Feature Modeling In: Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), 2011 15th International (IEEE, 2011)

  29. Valerio A., Succi G., Fenaroli M., Domain analysis and framework-based software development, SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev., 5, 4–15, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasilecas O., Kalibatiene D., Guizzardi G., Towards a Formal Method for the Transformation of Ontology Axioms to Application Domain Rules, Inf. Technol. Contro., 38, 271–282, 2009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Bačíková.

About this article

Cite this article

Bačíková, M., Porubän, J. Analyzing stereotypes of creating graphical user interfaces. centr.eur.j.comp.sci. 2, 300–315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13537-012-0020-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13537-012-0020-x

Keywords

Navigation