Soot in Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary clays worldwide: is it really derived from fossil fuel beds close to Chicxulub?
Communication
First Online:
Abstract
High soot contents have been reported in Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary (KPB) clays worldwide. One of the interpretations suggests this material comes from combustion of fossil fuels such as crude oil, coal or oil shales near the Chicxulub impact site. Combustion was triggered by the KPB impactor. In this Note, I show that the estimated mass of crude oil (or fossil hydrocarbons in general) burned (ca. 1017–1019 g), based on the average amount of soot (0.0022–0.012 g cm−2) or elemental carbon (0.011 g cm−2) found at the marine KPB sites, contradicts the fossil hydrocarbons hypothesis.
Keywords
Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary soot crude oil combustion fossil fuel fossil carbonPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Shukolyukov A., Lugmair G.W., Isotopic evidence for the Cretaceous-Tertiary impactor and its type. Science, 1998, 282, 927–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]Wolbach W.S., Lewis R.S., Anders E., Cretaceous extinctions: evidence for wildfires and search for meteoritic material. Science, 1985, 230, 167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]Wolbach W.S., Gilmour I., Anders E., Orth C.J., Brooks R.R., Global fire at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Nature, 1988, 334, 665–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Wolbach W.S., Anders E., Nazarov M.A., Fires at the K-T boundary: carbon at the Sumbar, Turkmenia, site. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1990, 54, 1133–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Wolbach W.S., Gilmour I., Anders E., Major wildfires at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. In: Sharpton B., Ward P. (Eds.), Global catastrophes in Earth history. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 247, 1990, 391–400Google Scholar
- [6]Wolbach W.S., Widicus S.L., Kyte F.T., A search for soot from global wildfires in Central Pacific Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary and other extinction and impact horizon sediments. Astrobiology, 2003, 3, 91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]Belcher C.M., Collinson M.E., Sweet A.R., Hildebrand A.R., Scott A.C., Constraints on the thermal energy released from the Chixculub impactor: new evidence from multi method charcoal analysis. J. Geol. Soc. London, 2005, 162, 591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]Gilmour I., Sephton M.A., Morgan J.V., Organic geochemistry of a hydrocarbon-rich calcarenite from the Chicxulub scientific drilling program. In: Proceedings of the 34th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 2003, abs. 1771Google Scholar
- [9]Belcher C.M., Collinson M.E., Sweet A.R., Hildebrand A.R., Scott A.C., Fireball passes and nothing burnsthe role of thermal radiation in the K-T event: evidence from the charcoal record of North America. Geology, 2003, 31, 1061–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]Belcher C.M., Impacts and Wildfires 210 — An analysis of the K-T Event. In: Koeberl C., Gilmour I. (Eds.), Biological processes associated with impact events. Springer, Berlin, 2006, 221–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]Belcher C.M., Reigniting the Cretaceous-Palaeogene firestorm debate. Geology, 2009, 37, 1147–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Harvey M.C., Brassell S.C., Belcher C.M., Montanari A., Combustion of fossil organic matter at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-P) boundary. Geology, 2008, 36, 355–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]Ransohoff L.M., Knudson K., Bush B.W., Small R.D., Material inventories and smoke properties for U.S. target areas. Pacific-Sierra Research Corporation, Los Angeles, 1989Google Scholar
- [14]Turco R.P., Toon O.B., Ackerman T.P., Pollack J.B., Sagan C., Climate and smoke: an appraisal of nuclear winter. Science, 1990, 247, 166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]Shuvalov V.V., Artemieva N.A., Numerical modeling of Tunguska-like impacts. Planet. Space Sci., 2002, 50, 181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]Ebel D.S., Grossman L., Spinel-bearing spherules condensed from the Chicxulub impact-vapor plume. Geology, 2005, 33, 293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]Durda D.D., Kring D.A., Pierazzo E., Melosh H. J., Model calculations of the proximal and globally distributed distal ejecta from the Chicxulub impact crater. In: Proceedings of the 28th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 1997, 315–316Google Scholar
- [18]Grajales-Nishimura J.M., Cedillo-Pardo E., Rosales-Domínguez C., Morán-Zenteno D.J., Alvarez W., Claeys P., Ruíz-Morales J., García-Hernández J., Padilla-Avila P., Sánchez-Ríos A., Chicxulub impact: the origin of reservoir and seal facies in the southeastern Mexico oil fields. Geology, 2000, 28, 307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]Heymann D., Yancey T.E, Wolbach W.S, Thiemens M.H, Johnson E.A, Roach D., Moecker S., Geochemical markers of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event at Brazos River, Texas, USA. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1998, 62, 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]Toon O.B., Zahnle K., Morrison D., Turco R.P., Covey C., Environmental perturbations caused by the impacts of asteroids and comets. Rev. Geophys., 1997, 35, 41–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]Magoon L.B., Hudson T.L., Cook H.E., Pimienta-Tamabra(!)-a giant supercharged petroleum system in the southern Gulf of Mexico, onshore and offshore Mexico. In: Bartolini C., Buffler R.T., Cantu-Chapa A. (Eds.), The western Gulf of Mexico basin: tectonics, sedimentary basins, and petroleum systems. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, USA, 75, 2001, 83–125Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012