Skip to main content
Log in

Soot in Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary clays worldwide: is it really derived from fossil fuel beds close to Chicxulub?

  • Communication
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Geosciences

Abstract

High soot contents have been reported in Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary (KPB) clays worldwide. One of the interpretations suggests this material comes from combustion of fossil fuels such as crude oil, coal or oil shales near the Chicxulub impact site. Combustion was triggered by the KPB impactor. In this Note, I show that the estimated mass of crude oil (or fossil hydrocarbons in general) burned (ca. 1017–1019 g), based on the average amount of soot (0.0022–0.012 g cm−2) or elemental carbon (0.011 g cm−2) found at the marine KPB sites, contradicts the fossil hydrocarbons hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Shukolyukov A., Lugmair G.W., Isotopic evidence for the Cretaceous-Tertiary impactor and its type. Science, 1998, 282, 927–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolbach W.S., Lewis R.S., Anders E., Cretaceous extinctions: evidence for wildfires and search for meteoritic material. Science, 1985, 230, 167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolbach W.S., Gilmour I., Anders E., Orth C.J., Brooks R.R., Global fire at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Nature, 1988, 334, 665–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolbach W.S., Anders E., Nazarov M.A., Fires at the K-T boundary: carbon at the Sumbar, Turkmenia, site. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1990, 54, 1133–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolbach W.S., Gilmour I., Anders E., Major wildfires at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. In: Sharpton B., Ward P. (Eds.), Global catastrophes in Earth history. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 247, 1990, 391–400

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wolbach W.S., Widicus S.L., Kyte F.T., A search for soot from global wildfires in Central Pacific Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary and other extinction and impact horizon sediments. Astrobiology, 2003, 3, 91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Belcher C.M., Collinson M.E., Sweet A.R., Hildebrand A.R., Scott A.C., Constraints on the thermal energy released from the Chixculub impactor: new evidence from multi method charcoal analysis. J. Geol. Soc. London, 2005, 162, 591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilmour I., Sephton M.A., Morgan J.V., Organic geochemistry of a hydrocarbon-rich calcarenite from the Chicxulub scientific drilling program. In: Proceedings of the 34th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 2003, abs. 1771

    Google Scholar 

  9. Belcher C.M., Collinson M.E., Sweet A.R., Hildebrand A.R., Scott A.C., Fireball passes and nothing burnsthe role of thermal radiation in the K-T event: evidence from the charcoal record of North America. Geology, 2003, 31, 1061–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Belcher C.M., Impacts and Wildfires 210 — An analysis of the K-T Event. In: Koeberl C., Gilmour I. (Eds.), Biological processes associated with impact events. Springer, Berlin, 2006, 221–243

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Belcher C.M., Reigniting the Cretaceous-Palaeogene firestorm debate. Geology, 2009, 37, 1147–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harvey M.C., Brassell S.C., Belcher C.M., Montanari A., Combustion of fossil organic matter at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-P) boundary. Geology, 2008, 36, 355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ransohoff L.M., Knudson K., Bush B.W., Small R.D., Material inventories and smoke properties for U.S. target areas. Pacific-Sierra Research Corporation, Los Angeles, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turco R.P., Toon O.B., Ackerman T.P., Pollack J.B., Sagan C., Climate and smoke: an appraisal of nuclear winter. Science, 1990, 247, 166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shuvalov V.V., Artemieva N.A., Numerical modeling of Tunguska-like impacts. Planet. Space Sci., 2002, 50, 181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebel D.S., Grossman L., Spinel-bearing spherules condensed from the Chicxulub impact-vapor plume. Geology, 2005, 33, 293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Durda D.D., Kring D.A., Pierazzo E., Melosh H. J., Model calculations of the proximal and globally distributed distal ejecta from the Chicxulub impact crater. In: Proceedings of the 28th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 1997, 315–316

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grajales-Nishimura J.M., Cedillo-Pardo E., Rosales-Domínguez C., Morán-Zenteno D.J., Alvarez W., Claeys P., Ruíz-Morales J., García-Hernández J., Padilla-Avila P., Sánchez-Ríos A., Chicxulub impact: the origin of reservoir and seal facies in the southeastern Mexico oil fields. Geology, 2000, 28, 307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heymann D., Yancey T.E, Wolbach W.S, Thiemens M.H, Johnson E.A, Roach D., Moecker S., Geochemical markers of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event at Brazos River, Texas, USA. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1998, 62, 173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toon O.B., Zahnle K., Morrison D., Turco R.P., Covey C., Environmental perturbations caused by the impacts of asteroids and comets. Rev. Geophys., 1997, 35, 41–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magoon L.B., Hudson T.L., Cook H.E., Pimienta-Tamabra(!)-a giant supercharged petroleum system in the southern Gulf of Mexico, onshore and offshore Mexico. In: Bartolini C., Buffler R.T., Cantu-Chapa A. (Eds.), The western Gulf of Mexico basin: tectonics, sedimentary basins, and petroleum systems. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, USA, 75, 2001, 83–125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavle I. Premović.

About this article

Cite this article

Premović, P.I. Soot in Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary clays worldwide: is it really derived from fossil fuel beds close to Chicxulub?. cent.eur.j.geo. 4, 383–387 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13533-011-0073-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13533-011-0073-8

Keywords

Navigation