Central European Journal of Engineering

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 638–649 | Cite as

Experimental and analytical study of high velocity impact on Kevlar/Epoxy composite plates

  • Rahul S. Sikarwar
  • Raman VelmuruganEmail author
  • Velmuri Madhu
Research Article


In the present study, impact behavior of Kevlar/Epoxy composite plates has been carried out experimentally by considering different thicknesses and lay-up sequences and compared with analytical results. The effect of thickness, lay-up sequence on energy absorbing capacity has been studied for high velocity impact. Four lay-up sequences and four thickness values have been considered. Initial velocities and residual velocities are measured experimentally to calculate the energy absorbing capacity of laminates. Residual velocity of projectile and energy absorbed by laminates are calculated analytically. The results obtained from analytical study are found to be in good agreement with experimental results. It is observed from the study that 0/90 lay-up sequence is most effective for impact resistance. Delamination area is maximum on the back side of the plate for all thickness values and lay-up sequences. The delamination area on the back is maximum for 0/90/45/-45 laminates compared to other lay-up sequences.


Kevlar Epoxy composite plates Velocity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Zhu G., Goldsmith W., Dharan C.H.K., Penetration of laminated Kevlar by projectiles- I. Experimental investigation, Inter. J. Solids Struct., 1992, 29(4), 399–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ganesh Babu M., Velmurugan R., Gupta N.K., Energy absorption and ballistic limit of targets struck by heavy projectile. Latin Am. J. Solids Struct., 2006, 3, 21–39Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Mines R.A.W., Roach A.M., Jones N., High velocity perforation behavior of polymer composite laminates, Inter. J. Impact. Eng., 1999, 22, 561–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hazell P.J., Appleby-Thomas G.J., Kister G,. Impact, penetration, and perforation of a bonded carbon-fibrereinforced plastic composite panel by a high-velocity steel sphere: an experimental study. J. Strain Anal. 45. Special issue paper 439Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Lopez-Puente J., Zaera R., Navarrao C., Experimental and numerical analysis of normal and oblique ballistic impacts on thin carbon/epoxy woven laminates, Compos. Part A, 2008, 39, 374–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chang F.K., Chang K.Y., A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations, J. Comps. Maters., 1987, 21(9), 834–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gower H.L., Cronon D.S., Plumtree A., Ballistic impact response of laminated composite panels, Inter. J. Impact. Eng., 2008, 35(9), 1000–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sevkat E., Liaw B., Delale F., Raju B.B., A combined experimental and numerical approach to study ballistic impact response of S2-glass [U+FB01]ber/toughened epoxy composite beams, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2009, 69, 965–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Morye S.S., Hine P.J., Duckett R.A., Carr D.J., et al., Modelling of energy absorbtion by polymer composites upon ballistic impact, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2000, 60, 2631–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Smith J.C., McCrackin F.L., Schiefer H.F., Stress strain relationships in yarns subjected to rapid impact loading. Part V, Tex. Res. J. 1957, 288–302Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Paga-Landa B., Hernandez-Olivares F., An analytical model to predict impact behavior of soft armours, Inter. J. Solids. Struct., 1995, 16(3), 455–466Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bohong G., Analytical modeling for the ballistic perforation of planer plain-woven fabric target by projectile, Compos. Part B, 2003, 34, 361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Naik N.K., Shrirao P., Composite structures under ballistic impact, Compos. Struct., 2004, 66, 79–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Zhu G., Goldsmith W., Dharan C.H.K., Penetration of laminated Kevlar by projectiles-II. Analytical model, Inter. J. Solids Struct., 1992, 29(4), 421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Benloulo I.S.C, Sanchez-Galvez V., A new analytical model to simulate impact onto ceramic/composite armours. Inter. J. Solids Struct., 1998, 21(6), 461–471Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Gama B.A., Gillespie Jr. J.W., A quasi-static penetration model of ballistic penetration of thick-section composites. 52, 20th annual technical conference, American society for composites, Philadelphia, PA; September 7–9, 2005Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Falanagan M.P., Zikry M.A., Wall J.W., El-Shiekh A., An experimental investigation of high velocity impact and penetration failure modes in textile composites. J. Compos. Mater., 1999, 33, 1080–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul S. Sikarwar
    • 1
  • Raman Velmurugan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Velmuri Madhu
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. Of Aerospace EngineeringIIT MadrasChennai, TamilnaduIndia
  2. 2.Defense Metallurgical Research LaboratoryHyderabad, Andhra PradeshIndia

Personalised recommendations