Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of discomfort glare in the 50+ elderly: experimental study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to analyze discomfort glare sensation in subjects aged 50 years and more in comparison with younger subjects (i.e. younger than 35 years of age).

Material and Methods

The experiments were performed on a computer workstation placed in controlled lighting environment where 2 discomfort glare conditions were modeled. Each participant performed for about 1 h specially designed visual tasks, including the tests with Landolt’s rings presented on the screen by a computer program. The glare evaluation method consisted of subjective evaluation of discomfort glare on the semantic glare rating scale, tests of mesopic contrast and glare sensitivity, subjective assessment of lighting quality and asthenopic symptoms. The time needed to perform the task and the number of mistakes were also recorded. The subjective evaluation of glare was compared with the Unified Glare Rating (UGR) index calculated by the DIALux simulation program.

Results

A higher percentage of the younger group subjects assessed glare after the experimental session as uncomfortable and intolerable than in the 50+ group, who more often assessed glare as acceptable. The assessment of discomfort glare in the younger group corresponded to higher UGR value compared to UGR value calculated by DIALux. In the 50+ group, such correlation was found only for lower discomfort glare (UGR = 19). The results showed that younger participants more frequently suffered from visual fatigue and assessed lighting as less comfortable. However, the mesopic glare sensitivity increased significantly after the experiments only in the 50+ group under both glare conditions.

Conclusions

The obtained results showed that discomfort glare sensation changes with age. The younger population seems to be more sensitive and demanding than the older one in relation to discomfort glare limiting, in spite of the lack of significant objective measures of fatigue. The exposure of the elderly to bigger discomfort glare could adversely affect the objective measures of fatigue like mesopic glare sensitivity and visual performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. Geneva, Switzerland [cited 2013 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html.

  2. Veitch JA. Lighting for well-being: A revolution in lighting? Proceedings of the 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on Lighting and Health (CIE x031:2006); 2006 Sep 7–8; Ontario, Canada. Vienna: Commission Internationale de L’Ecalirage; 2006. p. 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Commission Internationale de L’Ecalirage. Ocular lighting effects on human physiology and behavior. Vienna: CIE; 2004. CIE technical report no. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aschoff J. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, biological rhythms. New York: Plenum Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rea MS. Lighting handbook reference & application. 9th ed. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Veitch J, Newsham R. Determinants of lighting quality II: Research and recommendations. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada; 1996. p 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Commission Internationale de L’Ecalirage. Discomfort glare in the interior working environment. Vienna: CIE; 1983. CIE Publication no. 55 (TC 3.4).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wolska A. Glare as a specific factor in the working environment. Przegl Elektrotechn. 2013;89(1a/2013):142–144.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopkinson RG. Glare from daylighting in buildings. Appl Ergon. 1972;3:206–215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(72)90102-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berman SM, Bullimore MA, Jacobs RJ, Bailey LL, Gandhi N. An objective-measure of discomfort glare. J Illuminat Eng. 1994;23:40–49, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00994480.1994.10748079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennet CA. Discomfort glare, the effect of instructions. Special report #103. Manhattan: Kansas State University Engineering Experiment Station; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke KC, Boyce PR, Beckstead JW. Factors influencing the stability of glare assessments. Proceedings of the Conference of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America; 1991 Aug 11–15; Montreal, Canada. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America; 1991. p.36–66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eble-Hankins M. Subjective impression of discomfort glare from sources of non-uniform luminance [dissertation and student research paper] [Internet]. University of Nebraska of Lincoln Architectural Engineering; 2008[cited 2013 Oct 1]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=archengdiss.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geedrinck L. Glare perception in terms of acceptance and comfort [graduation report]. Eindhoven: University of Technology; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hopkinson RG. Evaluation of glare. Illum Eng. 1957;52(6):305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Commission Internationale de L’Ecalirage. Lighting of work places part 1: Indoor. Vienna: CIE; 2001. CIE Publication S 008/E;2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Committee for Standardization. Light and lighting. Part 1. Lighting of work places. Indoor work places. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2011. European Standard EN 12464-1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wolska A, Sawicki S. Comparison of discomfort glare evaluation using different techniques. Proceedings of 12th European Lighting Conference LUX EUROPA 2013; 2013 Sep 17–19; Kraków, Poland. Warszawa: Polish Committee on Illumination (CIE Poland); 2013. p. 553–558.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Commission Internationale de L’Ecalirage. Discomfort glare in interior lighting. Vienna: CIE; 1995. CIE Publication no. 117 (TC 3–13) 1995.

  20. Gross Figueiro M. Lighting the way: A key to independence. Lighting Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: New York; 2001 [cited 2013 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/lightHealth/AARP/pdf/AARPbook1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nersveen J. Sight weakness and universal design. Proceedings of CIE 26th Session; 2007 Jul 4–11; Beijing, China. Vienna: Commission Internationale de L’Ecalirage (CIE); 2007. p. D 3–77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van de Kraatz J, van Norren D. Optical density of the aging human ocular media in the visible and the UV. J Opt Soc Am A. 2007;24(7):1842–1857, http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.001842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinto MR, Medici S, Zlotnicki A, Bianchi A, Sant C, Napoli C. Reduced visual acuity in elderly people: The role of ergonomics and geronotechnology. Age Ageing. 1997;(26):339–344, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.5.339.

  24. Schierz C. Lighting for the elderly: Physiological basics and their consequences. Proceedings of the Conference LUX EUROPA 2009; 2009 Sep 9–11; Istanbul. Istanbul: Turkish National Committee on Illumination (ATMK); 2009. p. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Geerdinck L, Zande B, Talen A, Erp T, Schlangen L. Comfortable lighting for seniors: The effect of illuminance and color temperature on the visual acuity in later life. Proceedings of the Conference LUX EUROPA 2009; 2009 Sep 9–11; Istanbul. Istanbul: Turkish National Committee on Illumination (ATMK); 2009. p.357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moosmann C, Wienold J, Wagner A, Wittwer V. Age effects on glare perception under daylight conditions. Proceedings of the Conference LUX EUROPA 2009; 2009 Sep 9–11; Istanbul. Istanbul: Turkish National Committee on Illumination (ATMK); 2009. p. 439–442.

    Google Scholar 

  27. DIALux [Internet]. DIAL light. Building. Software [cited 2013 May 15]. Available from: http://www.dial.de/DIAL/en/dialux.html.

  28. Wolska A. Visual strain and lighting preferences of VDT users under different lighting systems. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2003;9(4):431–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wolska A. Intelligent lighting systems and users’ visual fatigue. Przegl Elektrotechn. 2007;83(5):97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Puell MC, Palomo C, Sanchez-Ramos C, Villena C. Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare in a large driver population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 [cited 2013 Oct 1];242(9):755–761. Available from: http://www.oculus.de/pl/sites/detail_ger.php?page=525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scharwey K, Krzizok T, Herfurth M. Night driving capacity of ophthalmologically healthy persons of various ages Ophthalmologe. 1998;95:555–558, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003470050315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sawicki S, Wolska A. Algorithm of HDR image preparation for discomfort glare assessment. Przegl Elektrotechn. 2013;89(2a):87–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Safety Engineering, Laboratory of Optical Radiation, Central Institute for Labour Protection — National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Warszawa, Poland

    Agnieszka Wolska

  2. Institute of Theory of Electrical Engineering, Measurements and Information Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Warszawa, Poland

    Dariusz Sawicki

  3. Institute of Theory of Electrical Engineering, Measurements and Information Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, 00-662, Warszawa, Poland

    Dariusz Sawicki

Authors
  1. Agnieszka Wolska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dariusz Sawicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariusz Sawicki.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolska, A., Sawicki, D. Evaluation of discomfort glare in the 50+ elderly: experimental study. IJOMEH 27, 444–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0257-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0257-9

Key words

Search

Navigation