Abstract
In the field of developmental biology, there is compelling evidence for a network of activity of pluripotency and stem-associated genes comprising of Oct4, Nanog and nestin. During neurogenesis, the choice between enhancement versus suppression of transcriptional modulation of these identified genes determines the balance between self-renewal neural stem cells (NSC) and immature neuronal phenotypes. By using immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR techniques, our study aims to address the question whether and to what extent mRNA and protein profiles are expressed in human fetal neurospheres obtained from cortical and striatal brain regions, both in expansion (undifferentiated cells) and differentiation conditions monitored after 1 and 4 weeks in vitro culturing. Our results clearly demonstrate the sustained presence of opposite signals: strong downregulation of Oct4 and Nanog genes in cortical differentiating cells and significant up-regulation for nestin gene both in cortical and striatal differentiating cells. Notably, by immunostaining techniques, Oct4 and Nanog protein expression have indicated the presence of both nuclear and cytoplasmic content followed by their rapid turnover (immediately after 1 week). Moreover, during the differentiation process, dissociated neurospheres displayed unexpected number of nestin positive cells accompanied by a constant level of staining intensity. In conclusion, the present study provides new insights into brain region related features in terms of Oct4, Nanog and nestin expression both at cellular and molecular level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Niwa H., How is pluripotency determined and maintained, Development, 2007, 134, 635–646
Liang J., Wan M., Zhang Y., Gu P., Xin H., Jung S.Y. et al., Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells, Nature Cell Biol., 2008, 10, 731–739
Chambers I., Tomlinson S.R., The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency, Development, 2009, 136, 2311–2322
Ivanova N.B., Dimos J.T., Schaniel C., Hackney J.A., Moore K.A., Lemischka I.R., A stem cell molecular signature, Science, 2002, 298, 601–604
Ramalho-Santos M., Yoon S., Matsuzaki Y., Mulligan R.C., Melton D.A., “Stemness”: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science, 2002, 298, 597–600
Hitoshi S., Seaberg R.M., Koscik C., Alexson T., Kusunoki S., Kanazawa I. et al., Primitive neural stem cells from the mammalian epiblast differentiate to definitive neural stem cells under the control of Notch signaling, Genes Dev., 2004, 18, 1806–1811
Merkle F.T., Alvarez-Buylla A., Neural stem cells in mammalian development, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2006, 18, 704–709
Takehara T., Teramura T., Onodera Y., Kishigami S., Matsumoto K., Saeki K. Et al., Potential existence of stem cells with multiple differentiation abilities to three different germ lineages in mouse neurospheres, Stem Cells Dev., 2009, 18, 1433–40
Kim J.B., Sebastiano V., Wu G., Araúzo-Bravo M.J., Sasse P., Gentile L., et al., Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells, Cell, 2009, 136, 411–419
Chin J-H., Shiwaku H., Goda O., Komuro A., Okazawa H., Neural stem cells express Oct-3/4, Biochem Biophys Res Commun., 2009, 388, 247–251
Lee S.H., Jeyapalan J.N., Appleby V., Mohamed Noor D.A., Sottile V., Scotting P.J., Dynamic methylation and expression of Oct4 in early neural stem cells, J. Anat., 2010, 217, 203–213
Noisa P., Ramasamy T.S., Lamont F.R., Yu J.S.L., Sheldon M.J., Russell A., et al., Identification and characterization of the early differentiating cells in neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells, PLoS ONE, 2012, 7, 1–11
Akamatsu W., DeVeale B., Okano H., Cooney A.J., van der Kooy D., Suppression of Oct4 by germ cell nuclear factor restricts pluripotency and promotes neural stem cell development in the early neural lineage, J. Neurosci., 2009, 29, 2113–2124
Lengner C.J., Camargo F.D., Hochedlinger K., Welstead G.G., Zaidi S., Gokhale S., et al., Oct4 expression is not required for mouse somatic stem cell self-renewal, Cell Stem Cell., 2007, 1, 403–415
Okuda T., Tagawa K., Qi M.L., Hoshio M., Ueda H., Kawano H., et al., Oct-3/4 repression accelerates differentiation of neural progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 2004, 132, 18–30
Kozubenko N., Turnovcova K., Kapcalova M., Butenko O., Anderova M., Rusnakova V., et al., Analysis of in vitro and in vivo characteristics of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursors, Cell Transplant., 2010, 19, 471–486
Sundberg M., Andersson P.H., Åkesson E., Odeberg J., Holmberg L., Inzunza J., et al., Markers of pluripotency and differentiation in human neural precursor cells derived from embryonic stem cells and CNS tissue, Cell Transplant., 2011, 20, 177–191
Bain G., Kitchens D., Yao M., Huettner J.E., Gottlieb D.I., Embryonic stem cells express neuronal properties in vitro, Dev. Biol., 1995, 168, 342–357
Okabe S., Forsberg-Nilsson K., Spiro A.C., Segal M., McKay R.D., Development of neuronal precursor cells and functional postmitotic neurons from embryonic stem cells in vitro, Mech Dev., 1996, 59, 89–102
Kawasaki H., Mizuseki K., Nishikawa S., Kaneko S., Kuwana Y., Nakanishi S., et al., Induction of midbrain dopaminergic neurons from ES cells by stromal cell-derived inducing activity, Neuron., 2000, 28, 31–40
Tropepe V., Hitoshi S., Sirard C., Mak T.W., Rossant J., van der Kooy D., Direct neural fate specification from embryonic stem cells: a primitive mammalian neural stem cell stage acquired through a default mechanism, Neuron., 2001, 30, 65–78
Pruszak J., Sonntag K.C., Aung M.H., Sanchez-Pernaute R., Isacson O., Markers and methods for cell sorting of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural cell populations, Stem Cells., 2007, 25, 2257–2268
Okada Y., Matsumoto A., Shimazaki T., Enoki R., Koizumi A., Ishii S., et al., Spatiotemporal recapitulation of central nervous system development by murine embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem/progenitor cells, Stem Cells., 2008, 26, 3086–3098
Joannides A.J., Fiore-Hériché C., Battersby A.A., Athauda-Arachchi P., Bouhon I.A., Williams L., et al., A scaleable and defined system for generating neural stem cells from human embryonic stem cells, Stem Cells., 2007, 25, 731–737
Pastrana E., Silva-Vargas V., Doetsch F., Eyes wide open: a critical review of sphere-formation as an assay for stem cells, Cell Stem Cell., 2011, 8, 486–498
Cauffman G., Liebaers I., Van Steirteghem A., Van de Velde H., POU5F1 isoforms show different expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos, Stem Cells, 2006, 24, 2685–2691
Lee J., Kim H.K., Rho J.Y., Han Y.M., Kim J., The human OCT-4 isoforms differ in their ability to confer self-renewal, J. Biol. Chem., 2006, 281, 33554–33565
Zuk P.A., The intracellular distribution of the ES cell totipotent markers OCT4 and Sox2 in adult stem cells difers dramatically according to commercial antibody used, J. Cell. Biochem., 2009, 106, 867–877
Liedtke S, Stephan M., Kögler G., Oct4 expression revisited: potential pitfalls for data misinterpretation in stem cell research, Biol. Chem., 2008, 389, 845–850
Park J.A., Kim Y.E., Ha Y.H., Kwon H.J., Lee Y., High sensitivity of embryonic stem cells to proteasome inhibitors correlates with low expression heat shock protein and decrease of pluripotent cell marker expression, BMB Rep., 2012, 45, 299–304
Saxe J.P., Tomilin A., Schöler H.R., Plath K., Huang J., Post-translational regulation of Oct4 transcriptional activity, PLoS One, 2009, 4, 1–9
Tay Y., Zhang J., Thomson A.M., Lim B., Rigoutsos I., MicroRNAs to Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 coding region modulate embryonic stem cell differentiation, Nature, 2008, 455, 1124–1128
Kashyap V., Rezende N.C., Scotland K.B., Shaffer S.M., Persson J.L., Gudas L.J. et al., Regulation of stem cell pluripotency and differentiation involves a mutual regulatory circuit of the Nanog, OCT4, and SOX2 pluripotency transcription factors with polycomb repressive complexes and stem cell microRNAs, Stem Cells and Develop., 2009, 7, 1093–1108
Kallur T., Darsalia V., Lindvall O., Kokaia Z., Human fetal cortical and striatal neural stem cells generate region-specific neurons in vitro and differenziate extensively to neurons after intrastriatal transplantation in neonatal rats, J Neurosci Res., 2006, 84, 1630–1644
Gilyarov A.V., Nestin in central nervous system cells, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 2008, 38, 165–169
Pan G., Thomson J.A., Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency, Cell Res., 2007, 17, 42–49
Wagner R.T., Cooney A.J., OCT4: less is more, Cell Res., 2009, 19, 527–528
Stefanovic S., Pucéat M., Oct-3/4: not just a gatekeeper of pluripotency for embryonic stem cell, a cell fate instructor through a gene dosage effect, Cell Cycle, 2007, 6, 8–10
Park D., Xiang A.P., Mao F.F., Zhang L., Di C.G., Liu X.M., et al., Nestin is required for the proper self-renewal of neural stem cells, Stem Cells, 2010, 28, 2162–2171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Massa, D., Pillai, R., Monni, E. et al. Expression analysis of pluripotency-associated genes in human fetal cortical and striatal neural stem cells during differentiation. Translat.Neurosci. 3, 242–248 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13380-012-0033-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13380-012-0033-x