Abstract
This article provides a methodological tool for studying central civil service management structures (CCSMS) and their role in de-politicizing the civil service, thereby contributing to evidence-based civil service management. This tool can be used in comparative studies of CCSMS across, but also within countries, since civil service management functions are often split between several central organizations in one country. The comparative study of CCSMS is particularly useful for contemporary policy makers in EU member states, who currently face the challenge of reforming civil service systems due to EU pressure. There is therefore an urgent need to establish which type of central structure would effectively support the EU’s favored values of professionalizing and de-politicizing the civil service. Stemming from theory on organizational autonomy, our typology focuses on two key dimensions of the CCSMS that support these values: decision-making autonomy over individual civil servants and structural accountability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page Publishers.
Brown, K. (2004). Human resource management in the public sector. Public Management Review, 6(3), 303–309.
Demmke, C., Nomden, K., & Polet, R. (2001). Civil services in the Europe of fifteen. In D. Bossaert (Ed.), Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
Demmke, C. (2004). European civil services between tradition and reform. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
Dimitrov, V., Goetz, K. H., & Wollmann, H. (2006). Governing after communism: Institutions and policymaking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dunleavy, P., & Rhodes, R. A. (1990). Core executive studies in Britain. Public Administration, 68(1), 3–28.
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007). Rebuilding Leviathan: Party competition and state exploitation in postcommunist democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171–188.
IOBCSK (2014). Independent Oversight Board for the Civil Service of Kosovo. http://kpmshc.rks-gov.net/?cid=2,2
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1993). The study of public policy processes. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach.
Kopecky, P., Mair, P., & Spirova, M. (Eds.). (2012). Party patronage and party government in European democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lgreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2005). Autonomy and control in the Norwegian civil service: Does agency form matter? Working Paper 4. Bergen: Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies.
Malíková, Ľ. (2003). Verejná politika: aktéri a procesy. (Public policy: Actors and processes). Bratislava: Comenius University.
Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2004). Civil service reform in post-communist Europe: The bumpy road to depoliticisation. West European Politics, 27(1), 71–103.
Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2012). Civil service professionalisation in the Western Balkans (No. 48). OECD Publishing.
Nunberg, B. (1995). Managing the civil service: Reform lessons from advanced industrialized countries. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 204.
OECD (1997). Civil service legislation: Checklist on secondary legislation (and Other regulatory instruments). Sigma Papers, No. 14, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kml6g4zxd9w-en
OECD (1999). European principles for public administration. Sigma Papers, No. 27, OECD Publishing.
OECD (2011). Strategic human resources management. Government at a Glance 2011. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2011-22-en
OECD (2012). Organization of HR management. Human resource management country profiles. Data based on OECD (2010) Survey on Strategic Human Resources Management in Central/Federal Governments. Unpublished. http://www.oecd.org/gov/pem/hrpractices.htm
PM Office SVK (2014a). Odbor štátnej služby a verejnej služby (Department of Civil Service and Public Service). http://www.vlada.gov.sk/14089/odbor-statnej-sluzby-a-verejnej-sluzby/
PM Office SVK (2014b). Organizačný poriadok (Internal regulation). http://www.vlada.gov.sk/data/files/4225_organizacny-poriadok-uvsr.pdf
SAGE (2014). Swedish Agency for Government Employers. http://www.arbetsgivarverket.se/in-english/
Staroňová, K., & Gajduschek, G. (2013). Civil service reform in Slovakia and Hungary: The road to professionalisation? In Ch. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker, & L. Verhey (Eds.), Civil servants and politics: A delicate balance (pp. 123–151). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stone, R. (1995). Human resource management. Brisbane: Wiley.
Van der Meer, FM. (2011) (Ed.). Civil service systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public administration and development, 24(2), 101–118.
Woodrow, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article has been published as an output of a research project supported by the Ministry of Education under APVV grant scheme, no. APVV-0880-12 “Knowledge utilization in production of policy documents in policy making process”.
About this article
Cite this article
Staňová, Ľ. Central civil service management structures as brokers of de-politicization and evidence based civil service management: A typology. Humaff 24, 307–324 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0229-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0229-6