Skip to main content

Poverty and freedom

Abstract

The capability approach, which is closely connected to the works of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, is one possible theoretical framework that could be used to answer the question as to why poverty is a problem from a moral point of view. In this paper we will focus on the normative philosophical capability approach rather than the social scientific and descriptive perspective. We will show that the approach characterizes poverty mainly as a limitation of freedom and that it is precisely this aspect, from its point of view, that makes poverty morally significant. This insight shifts the discussion away from questions regarding specific capabilities or lists of them-questions treated extensively in the literature-to the more general level of what constitutes the normative core of the capability approach. But as we will also discuss and argue, the role of freedom alone does not give us a complete picture of poverty but only presents us with one aspect relevant to evaluating it. A further aspect which we consider has not been adequately recognized and taken into account by most capability theorists is the experience of disrespect and humiliation, or to put it differently, a lack of recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms. Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broussard, A., & Joseph, A. L. (Eds.). (2009). Family poverty in diverse contexts. New York / London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caillé, L., & Alain, C. (2006). Recognition today. The theoretical, ethical and political stakes of the concept. Critical Horizons, 7(1), 63–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Comim, F. & Teschl, M. (2005). Adaptive preferences and capabilities: Some preliminary conceptual explorations. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., & Alkire, S. (Eds.). (2008). The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dr ze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development: from economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In Redistribution or recognition?A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 110–197). London/New York, NY: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Honneth, A. (2011). Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hutchinson, P., Abrams, D., & Christian, J. (2007). The social psychology of exclusion. In D. Abrams, J. Christian, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Multidisciplinary handbook of social exclusion research (pp. 29–58). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment: A social-psychological analysis. Cambridge/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jo, Y. N. (2013). Psycho-social dimensions of poverty: When poverty becomes shameful. Critical Social Policy, 33(3), 514–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leßmann, O. (2013). Empirische Studien zum Capability Ansatz auf der Grundlage von Befragungen — ein überblick. In G. Graf, E. Kapferer, & C. Sedmak (Eds.), Der Capability Approach und seine Anwendung. Fähigkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen erkennen und fördern (pp. 25–61). Wiesbaden: SpringerVS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Shropshire, J., & Middleton, S. (1999). Small expectations: Learning to be poor? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, O. (1998). The culture of poverty. Society 35(2), 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lister, R. (2004). A politics of recognition and respect: Involving people with experience of poverty in decision-making that affects their lives. In J. Andersen & S. Birte (Eds.), The politics of inclusion and empowerment (pp. 116–138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, and species membership. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA/ London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robeyns, I. (2011). The capability approach. In E. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2011 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capabilityapproach (Accessed: 24 March 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. O’Neill, S., & Smith, N. H. (Eds). (2012). Recognition theory as social research: Investigating the dynamics of social conflict. Basingstoke/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paul, K. I., & Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schweiger, G. (2013). Recognition and social exclusion. A recognition-theoretical exploration of poverty in Europe. Ethical Perspectives, 20(3–4), 529–554.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living: Lecture I, Concepts and critiques. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The standard of living. The Tanner lectures (1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London/ New York: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stewart, M. J., Makwarimba, E., Reutter, L. I., Veenstra, G., Raphael, D., & Love, R. (2009). Poverty, sense of belonging and experiences of social isolation. Journal of Poverty, 13(2), 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunter Graf.

About this article

Cite this article

Graf, G., Schweiger, G. Poverty and freedom. Humaff 24, 258–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0224-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • poverty
  • capabilities
  • freedom
  • recognition