Abstract
The capability approach, which is closely connected to the works of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, is one possible theoretical framework that could be used to answer the question as to why poverty is a problem from a moral point of view. In this paper we will focus on the normative philosophical capability approach rather than the social scientific and descriptive perspective. We will show that the approach characterizes poverty mainly as a limitation of freedom and that it is precisely this aspect, from its point of view, that makes poverty morally significant. This insight shifts the discussion away from questions regarding specific capabilities or lists of them-questions treated extensively in the literature-to the more general level of what constitutes the normative core of the capability approach. But as we will also discuss and argue, the role of freedom alone does not give us a complete picture of poverty but only presents us with one aspect relevant to evaluating it. A further aspect which we consider has not been adequately recognized and taken into account by most capability theorists is the experience of disrespect and humiliation, or to put it differently, a lack of recognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms. Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Broussard, A., & Joseph, A. L. (Eds.). (2009). Family poverty in diverse contexts. New York / London: Routledge.
Caillé, L., & Alain, C. (2006). Recognition today. The theoretical, ethical and political stakes of the concept. Critical Horizons, 7(1), 63–100.
Comim, F. & Teschl, M. (2005). Adaptive preferences and capabilities: Some preliminary conceptual explorations. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 229–247.
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., & Alkire, S. (Eds.). (2008). The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dr ze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development: from economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In Redistribution or recognition?A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 110–197). London/New York, NY: Verso.
Honneth, A. (2011). Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hutchinson, P., Abrams, D., & Christian, J. (2007). The social psychology of exclusion. In D. Abrams, J. Christian, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Multidisciplinary handbook of social exclusion research (pp. 29–58). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment: A social-psychological analysis. Cambridge/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jo, Y. N. (2013). Psycho-social dimensions of poverty: When poverty becomes shameful. Critical Social Policy, 33(3), 514–531.
Leßmann, O. (2013). Empirische Studien zum Capability Ansatz auf der Grundlage von Befragungen — ein überblick. In G. Graf, E. Kapferer, & C. Sedmak (Eds.), Der Capability Approach und seine Anwendung. Fähigkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen erkennen und fördern (pp. 25–61). Wiesbaden: SpringerVS.
Shropshire, J., & Middleton, S. (1999). Small expectations: Learning to be poor? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Lewis, O. (1998). The culture of poverty. Society 35(2), 7–9.
Lister, R. (2004). A politics of recognition and respect: Involving people with experience of poverty in decision-making that affects their lives. In J. Andersen & S. Birte (Eds.), The politics of inclusion and empowerment (pp. 116–138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, and species membership. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA/ London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.
Robeyns, I. (2011). The capability approach. In E. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2011 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capabilityapproach (Accessed: 24 March 2013)
O’Neill, S., & Smith, N. H. (Eds). (2012). Recognition theory as social research: Investigating the dynamics of social conflict. Basingstoke/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul, K. I., & Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 264–282.
Schweiger, G. (2013). Recognition and social exclusion. A recognition-theoretical exploration of poverty in Europe. Ethical Perspectives, 20(3–4), 529–554.
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153–169.
Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living: Lecture I, Concepts and critiques. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), The standard of living. The Tanner lectures (1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London/ New York: Allen Lane.
Stewart, M. J., Makwarimba, E., Reutter, L. I., Veenstra, G., Raphael, D., & Love, R. (2009). Poverty, sense of belonging and experiences of social isolation. Journal of Poverty, 13(2), 173–195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Graf, G., Schweiger, G. Poverty and freedom. Humaff 24, 258–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0224-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0224-y