Skip to main content
Log in

Social trust, norms and morality

  • Published:
Human Affairs

Abstract

The article approaches the topic of social trust from an evolutionary perspective. It begins by summarising the most influential approaches that have defined specific and social trust and ascertains what causes differences in degrees of trust and how the potential risk of deception might be lowered. It then notes that the basis of morality had already been formed during the era of prehistoric man, who was able to create coalitions against aggressors and to socially control the behaviour of deviants. It points out, however, that having a certain predisposition to behaving cooperatively or an increased sensitivity to recognising and not tolerating behaviour aimed at abusing cooperation is not a sufficient guarantee of the fact that people will always (or at least in the majority of situations) favour cooperation over deception. One of the reasons for this is a tendency to favour short-term gains over long-term ones. The article argues that establishing norms (moral, social and legal) produces a higher level of social trust because it not only “encourages” individuals to behave in certain ways in particular situations but also works as a sanction which “discourages” the individual from socially deviant behaviour. The article then focuses on a debate about the causal relationship between social trust and social capital. It discusses the suggestion that political institutions, government and the judiciary may reduce rather than raise levels of social capital and consequently also the level of social trust. This is partly because of their powerful position and the consequent scope for corruption and partly because of the fact that even when attempting to act honestly, representatives of these institutions cannot sufficiently reflect upon dynamic change at the local level. Finally, the article ends by adopting the position that social trust is built primarily from bottom up and so it is risky to continually doubt the very existence and usefulness of social norms and morality and to be governed simply by legal norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. D. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society. The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjrnskov, C. (2006). Determinants of Generalized Trust: A Cross-Country Comparison. Public Choice 130, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Ch. (2002). Conflict and the Evolution of Social Control. In Leonard D. Katz (Ed.). Evolutionary Origins of Morality, pp. 130–139. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. (2002). Social Networks and Trust. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., Newton, K. (2003). Who Trusts? The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Societies. European Societies 5,2, 93–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond. J. (2008). Kolaps. Proč společnosti zanikají a přežívají. Praha: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, U. D. (2009). Kultura svobody. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1990). A Theory of Moral Sentiments. In J.J. Mansbridge (Ed.). Beyond Self-Interest, pp. 71–96. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2006). Velký rozvrat. Lidská přirozenost a rekonstrukce společenského řádu. Praha: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, D., Lubbers, M. (2010). Unknown Is Unloved? Diversity and Inter-population Trust in Europe. European Union Politics 2, 267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, K., Setälä, M. (2011). In Honest Officials We Trust: Institutional Confidence in Europe. American Review of Public Administration XX(X), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.). Moral Psychology. Vol. 2. The Cognitive Science and Morality: Intuition and Diversity, pp. 181–217. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I, II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herreros, F. (2004). The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust? New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Hough, M., Bradford, B., Pooler, T., Hohl, K., Kuha, J. (2011). Trust in Justice: Topline Results from Round 5. http://www.icpr.org.uk/media/32166/Topline%20Results%20from%20Round%205%20of%20the%20ESS.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauft, B. M. (2002). Symbols, Sex, and Sociality in the Evolution of Human Morality. In Leonard D. Katz (Ed.). Evolutionary Origins of Morality, pp. 130–139. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. C. (1977). A Dynamic Theory of Racial Income Differences. In P.A. Wallace and A. M. LaMond (Eds.). Women, Minorities and Employment Discrimination, pp. 153–186. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, B. G. (2011). Neither Government Nor Community Alone: A Test of State-Centered Models of Generalized Trust. Rationality and Society 23(3), 304–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2005). Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roumeliotou, M., Rontos, K. (2009). Social Trust in Local Communities and Its Demographic, Socioeconomic Predictors: The Case of Kalloni, Lesvos, Greece. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 2,1, 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD Triad Hypothesis: A Mapping between Three Moral Emotions (Contempt, Anger, Disgust) and Three Moral Codes (Community, Autonomy, Divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76,4, 574–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslav Popper.

Additional information

This article was supported by VEGA grant no. 2/0015/12.

About this article

Cite this article

Popper, M. Social trust, norms and morality. Humaff 23, 443–457 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0140-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0140-6

Key words

Navigation