Determination of optical field generated by a microlens using digital holographic method


In the paper, application of the digital holographic method for full field characterization of the beam generated by microlenses is considered. For this goal, the laboratory setup was designed based on Mach-Zehnder interferometry with the additional reference channel. The beam generated by a microlens was imaged by an afocal system and intensity distributions or interferograms (holograms) were registered by CCD camera. The digital holography using one image allows us to determine microlens parameters, i.e., focal length, aberrations, and shape. The optimum conditions to determine the surface shape of a microlens using holographic method have been found. We compare obtained results with geometrical and interferometric measurements. We show the advantage of digital holography for a shape microlens determination (improved accuracy), aberrations, and focal length (characterization facility). Through optimum refocusing, the digital holography gives more precise shape. The paper is accompanied with computer simulations and the experimental measurement data for geometrical, interferometric, and holographic methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    C.A. Edwards, H.M. Prestby, and C. Dragone, “Ideal microlens for laser to fiber coupling”, J. Lightwave Technol. 11, 252–257 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    H.J. Tiziani, R. Achi, R.N. Krämer, T. Hessler, M.T. Gale, M. Rossi, and R.E. Kunz, “Microlens arrays for confocal microscopy”, Opt. Laser Technol. 29, 85–91 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    H.P. Herzig, Micro-Optics, Elements, Systems and Applications, Taylor and Francis, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    T. Miyashita, “Standardization for microlenses and microlens arrays”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 5391–5396 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    B.K. Lee, D.S. Kim, and T.H. Kwon, “Replication of microlens arrays by injection molding”, Microsyst. Technol. 10, 531–535 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    H. Ottevaere and H. Thienpont, “Refractive optical microlenses: an introduction to nomenclature and characterization techniques”, in Encyclopedia of Modern Optics, Vol. 4, pp. 21–43, edited by R.D. Guenther, D.G. Steel, and L. Bayvel, Elsevier, Oxford, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    F. Charriëre, J. Kuhn, T. Colomb, F. Montfort, E. Cuche, Y. Emery, and K. Weible, “Characterization of microlenses by digital holographic microscopy”, Appl. Optics 45, 829–835 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    T. Kozacki, M. Kujawińska, and P. Kniazewski “Investigating the limitation of optical scalar field tomography”, Opto-Electron. Rev. 15, 102–109 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A. Rohrbach and W. Singer, “Scattering of a scalar field at dielectric surfaces by Born series expansion”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2651–2659 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    T. Kozacki, “Numerical errors of diffraction computing using Plane Wave Spectrum Decomposition”, Opt. Commun. 281, 4219–4223 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Kozacki.

About this article

Cite this article

Kozacki, T., Józwik, M. & Jóźwicki, R. Determination of optical field generated by a microlens using digital holographic method. Opto-Electron. Rev. 17, 211–216 (2009).

Download citation


  • holography
  • interferometry
  • microlenses