Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of single and multi-host enrichment approach for harnessing lytic phages against antimicrobial-resistant E. coli: Repurposing the enrichment step

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Escherichia coli has been enlisted as a pathogen of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) importance posing a threat to human health. In the wake of the widespread AMR, lytic bacteriophages remain a promising alternative to antibiotics for controlling the multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. However, the major hindrance for phage therapy is the lack of a rapid procedure to harness broad host range phages. Hitherto in vogue, lytic phage isolation methods are based on conventional single host enrichment (M1). Limitation to the available methods includes a higher number of steps, additional instrumentation, cost and time involved in the screening of samples and more recovery of narrow host range phages.To improve the conventional method of isolation, a multiple host enrichment approach (modified method; M2) is developed and validated with a classical approach using 24 MDR extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing (ESBL) E. coli and universal coliphage host E. coli NCIM 2089. A total of 58 phages were isolated using both the methods (27 phages from M1 and 31 phages from M2) and were categorized, based on the DNA restriction digestion pattern, to 25 groups with a maximum host range of 17 in host range analysis. Even though there is no significant difference (P > 0.01) in recovering number of phages between M1 and M2 methods, excepting in one occasion where MFB13 host yielded 3 more morphologically distinct phages in M2 (p ≤ 0.05), the M2 approach was better in terms of reduction in time (4.72%) and cost (23.5%) and same instrumentation requirement. This emphasizes that the proposed method has the potential to yield broad host range lytic phages against localized strain repository of AMR E. coli which can be leading to its application in food, food contact surfaces as well as phage therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data generated from the study is submitted as Supplementary Table S1.

Abbreviations

MFB:

Microbiology Fermentation and Biotechnology Division

NCIM:

National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms

CLSI:

Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

PES:

Polyethersulfone

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for funding this research (Grant no: BT/PR26949/AAQ/2/888/2017). The authors are also thankful to ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology for providing the support.

Funding

The project is funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Grant no: BT/PR26949/AAQ/2/888/2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Murugadas Vaiyapuri, Mukteswar Prasad Mothadaka, and Madhusudana Rao Badireddy conceptualized the study; Murugadas Vaiyapuri, Karthika Raveendran, Iris George, Devika Gundubilli, Sivaraman Gopala Krishnan and Madhusudana Rao Badireddy performed the experiments, Murugadas Vaiyapuri, Karthika Raveendran, Madhusudana Rao Badireddy drafted the manuscript; Visnuvinayagam Sivam and Joshy Chalil George analysed the data; Mukteswar Prasad Mothadaka and Ravishankar Chandragiri Nagarajarao, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murugadas Vaiyapuri.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest with authors in publishing the research article.

Ethics approval

Laboratory animals were not used in the experiments.   

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors consented to publish the work. 

Code availability

Not applicable.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaiyapuri, M., Raveendran, K., George, I. et al. Comparison of single and multi-host enrichment approach for harnessing lytic phages against antimicrobial-resistant E. coli: Repurposing the enrichment step. Biologia 76, 1041–1052 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00652-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00652-2

Keywords

Navigation