Abstract
Glomalin related soil protein produced by mycorrhizal fungus such as Rhizophagus irregularis (GiHsp60) has been termed as a miracle protein for soil sustainability. In this study we propose an integrative in silico approach to explain the mode of interaction between GiHsp60 and the soil organic matter (SOM). In the first step of the study, the three-dimensional (3D) structure of GiHsp60 was constructed using the SWISS-MODEL server; while in the second step, the SOM model was optimized using the Gaussian program, followed by docking-molecular dynamics simulation studies to investigate the stability and interactions of GiHsp60_SOM complex, using Dock and Amber packages respectively. The quality of the modeled 3D structure of GiHsp60 was reasonably good based on reports generated by different validation servers. The docking results suggested that both Van der Waals (grid_vdw = −34.73 kcal mol−1) and electrostatic interactions (grid_es = −3.28 kcal mol−1) were responsible for the interaction between the protein and the ligand. Molecular dynamics simulation was used to compute the free energy of binding of GiHsp60_SOM complex under explicit conditions. The study further revealed that H-bonding, electrostatic, and Van der Waals forces, followed by hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions were the forces responsible for the binding of GiHsp60 with SOM. The present investigation is perhaps a benchmark study, which explains the interaction between GiHsp60 and SOM at the molecular level using computational approach. Results from this study can enable agriculture molecular biologists in their efforts to explore GiHsp60 as a potential soil conditioner, which in turn will lead ways to enhance inputs for sustainable agricultural systems and boost agricultural productivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GRSP:
-
Glomalin related soil protein
- GiHsp60:
-
Glomalin related soil protein produced by mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis
- SOM:
-
Soil organic matter
- AMF:
-
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
- t-SOM :
-
Gaussian optimized and truncated soil organic matter
- MD:
-
Molecular dynamics
- VdWaals:
-
Van der Waal’s energy
- Py-FIMS:
-
Pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry
- Py-GC/MS:
-
Pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry
- SPDBV:
-
Swiss-Pdb Viewer
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- RMSF:
-
Root mean square fluctuation
- RMSD:
-
Root mean square deviation
- VMD:
-
Visual Molecular Dynamics
- MM/GBSA:
-
Molecular mechanics / generalized Born surface area
References
Allen WJ, Balius TE, Mukherjee S, Brozell SR, Moustakas DT, Lang PT, Case DA, Kuntz ID, Rizzo RC (2015) DOCK 6: impact of new features and current docking performance. J Comput Chem 36:1132–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23905
Andersen A, Govind N, Laskin A (2017) Molecular Studies of Complex Soil Organic Matter Interactions with Metal Ions and Mineral Surfaces using Classical Molecular Dynamics and Quantum Chemistry Methods. InAGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
Andrade JD, Hlady V (1986) Protein adsorption and materials biocompatibility: a tutorial review and suggested hypotheses. InBiopolymers/Non-Exclusion HPLC. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-16422-7_6
Aquino AJ, Tunega D, Pašalić H, Schaumann GE, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH, Lischka H (2011) Molecular dynamics simulations of water molecule-bridges in polar domains of humic acids. Environ Sci Technol 45:8411–8419. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201831g
Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Particle density. In: Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. SSSA book series, pp 377–382. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c14
Bonnet P, Bryce RA (2004) Molecular dynamics and free energy analysis of neuraminidase–ligand interactions. Protein Sci 13:946–957. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.03129704
Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE et al (2008) Amber 10 (No. Book). University of California, Berkeley
Colovos C, Yeates TO (1993) Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 2:1511–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020916
Dennington R, Keith T, Millam J (2009) Semichem Inc. Shawnee Mission KS, GaussView, Version, 5
Dieudonné M, Ramesh KV (2015) Modeling the interactions between MC2R and ACTH models from human. J Biomol Struct Dyn 33:770–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2014.910475
Eisenberg D, Lüthy R, Bowie JU (1997) [20] VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. InMethods in enzymology, Academic Press, pp. 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(97)77022-8
Fiser A, Do RK (2000) Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 9:1753–1773. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.9.9.1753
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H (2009) Gaussian 09 Revision D. 01, Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT; 93
Fu Y, Zhao J, Chen Z (2018) Insights into the molecular mechanisms of protein-ligand interactions by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation: a case of oligopeptide binding protein. Comput Math Method M Article ID 3502514. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3502514
Gadkar V, Rillig MC (2006) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal protein glomalin is a putative homolog of heat shock protein 60. FEMS Microbiol Lett 263:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00412.x
Gao W, Wang P, Wu QS (2019) Functions and application of glomalin-related soil proteins: a review. Sains Malays 48:111–119. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2019-4801-13
Gillespie AW, Farrell RE, Walley FL, Ross AR, Leinweber P, Eckhardt KU, Regier ZT, Blyth RI (2011) Glomalin-related soil protein contains non-mycorrhizal-related heat-stable proteins, lipids and humic materials. Soil Biol Biochem 43:766–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.010
Haddad MJ, Sarkar D (2003) Glomalin, a newly discovered component of soil organic matter: part II—relationship with soil properties. Environ Geosci 10:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1306/eg.05020303005
Hlady V, Buijs J, Jennissen HP (1999) [26] Methods for studying protein adsorption. In Methods in enzymology, Academic Press, pp. 402–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)09028-X
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65:712–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21123
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38
Janos DP, Garamszegi S, Beltran B (2008) Glomalin extraction and measurement. Soil Biol Biochem 40:728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.007
Johansson MU, Zoete V, Michielin O, Guex N (2012) Defining and searching for structural motifs using DeepView/Swiss-PdbViewer. BMC Bioinform 13:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-173
Kumar CV, Swetha RG, Anbarasu A, Ramaiah S (2014) Computational analysis reveals the association of threonine 118 methionine mutation in PMP22 resulting in CMT-1A. Adv Bioinforma. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/502618
Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 26:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892009944
Loh J, Lohar DP, Andersen B, Stacey G (2002) A two-component regulator mediates population-density-dependent expression of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodulation genes. J Bacteriol 184:1759–1766. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.6.1759-1766.2002
Mahmud S, Ahmed S, Mia M, Islam S, Rahman T (2016) Homology modelling, bioinformatics analysis and Insilico functional annotation of an antitoxin protein from Streptomyces coelicolor A3 (2). J Proteomics Comput Biol 2:7
Massova I, Kollman PA (2000) Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding. Perspect Drug Discov Design 18:113–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008763014207
McCrery DA, Ledford EB, Gross ML (1982) Laser desorption Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 54:1435–1437. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00245a040
Meng LL, He JD, Zou YN, Wu QS, Kuča K (2020) Mycorrhiza-released glomalin-related soil protein fractions contribute to soil total nitrogen in trifoliate orange. Plant Soil Environ 66:183–189. https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2020-PSE
Oany AR, Ahmed MS, Jahan N, Latif MA, Mahmud S, Hossain MA, Akter F, Rakib HH, Islam MS (2015) Homology modeling and assigned functional annotation of an uncharacterized antitoxin protein from Streptomyces xinghaiensis. Bioinformation 11:493. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630011493
Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case DA (2004) Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins 55:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20033
Orsi M (2014) Molecular dynamics simulation of humic substances. Chem Biol Technol Agric 1:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-014-0010-4
Pace CN, Fu H, Lee Fryar K, Landua J, Trevino SR, Schell D, Thurlkill RL, Imura S, Scholtz JM, Gajiwala K, Sevcik J (2014) Contribution of hydrogen bonds to protein stability. Protein Sci 23:652–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2449
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–2512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
Rillig MC (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett 7:740–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00620.x
Rillig MC, Wright SF, Allen MF, Field CB (1999) Rise in carbon dioxide changes soil structure. Nature 400:628–628. https://doi.org/10.1038/23168
Rillig MC, Ramsey PW, Morris S, Paul EA (2003) Glomalin, an arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungal soil protein, responds to land-use change. Plant Soil 253:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024807820579
Rosier CL, Hoye AT, Rillig MC (2006) Glomalin-related soil protein: assessment of current detection and quantification tools. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2205–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.021
Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJ (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327–341
Saparpakorn P, Kim JH, Hannongbua S (2007) Investigation on the binding of polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons with soil organic matter: a theoretical approach. Molecules 12:703–715. https://doi.org/10.3390/12040703
Satyanarayana SD, Krishna MSR, Kumar PP, Jeereddy S (2018) In silico structural homology modeling of nif a protein of rhizobial strains in selective legume plants. Genet Eng Biotechnol 16:731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.06.006
Schaumann GE (2006) Soil organic matter beyond molecular structure part I: macromolecular and supramolecular characteristics. J Plant Nutr Soil Sc 169:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521785
Schindler FV, Mercer EJ, Rice JA (2007) Chemical characteristics of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) extracted from soils of varying organic matter content. Soil Biol Biochem 39:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.08.017
Schulten HR, Schnitzer M (1997) Chemical model structures for soil organic matter and soils. Soil Sci 162:115–130
Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3381–3385. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg520
Simpson AJ (2002) Determining the molecular weight, aggregation, structures and interactions of natural organic matter using diffusion ordered spectroscopy. Magn Reson Chem 40:S72–S82. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1106
Singh PK, Singh M, Tripathi BN (2013) Glomalin: an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal soil protein. Protoplasma 250:663–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-012-0453-z
Vanquelef E, Simon S, Marquant G, Garcia E, Klimerak G, Delepine JC, Cieplak P, Dupradeau FY (2011) RED server: a web service for deriving RESP and ESP charges and building force field libraries for new molecules and molecular fragments. Nucleic Acids Res 39(suppl_2):W511–W517. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr288
Vasconcellos RL, Bonfim JA, Baretta D, Cardoso EJ (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin-related soil protein as potential indicators of soil quality in a recuperation gradient of the Atlantic forest in Brazil. Land Degrad Dev 27:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.08.017
Warme PK, Momany FA, Rumball SV, Tuttle RW, Scheraga HA (1974) Computation of structures of homologous proteins alpha.-lactalbumin from lysozyme. Biochemistry 13:768–782. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00701a020
Wershaw RL (2004) Evaluation of conceptual models of natural organic matter (humus) from a consideration of the chemical and biochemical processes of humification. Sci Investig Rep:2004–5121
Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ (2007) ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35(suppl_2):W407–W410. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm290
Wright SF, Anderson RL (2000) Aggregate stability and glomalin in alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. Biol Fertil Soils 31:249–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050653
Wright SF, Upadhyaya A (1996) Extraction of an abundant and unusual protein from soil and comparison with hyphal protein of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci 161:575–586
Wright SF, Franke-Snyder M, Morton JB, Upadhyaya A (1996) Time-course study and partial characterization of a protein on hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during active colonization of roots. Plant Soil 181:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012053
Wright SF, Upadhyaya A (1998) A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 198:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004347701584
Wu QS, Cao MQ, Zou YN, He XH (2014) Direct and indirect effects of glomalin, mycorrhizal hyphae, and roots on aggregate stability in rhizosphere of trifoliate orange. Sci Rep 4:5823. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05823
Zhang HS, Zhou MX, Zai XM, Zhao FG, Qin P (2020) Spatio-temporal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil organic carbon in coastal saline soil of China. Sci Rep 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66976-w
Zou YN, Srivastava AK, Wu QS, Huang YM (2014) Glomalin-related soil protein and water relations in mycorrhizal citrus (Citrus tangerina) during soil water deficit. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.867950
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Financial disclosures
The enclosed work is not under consideration for publication in any another journal; its submission for publication has been approved by all relevant authors and the University.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Fig. S1
Docking of the best pose of the truncated SOM (ligand) onto the 3D model of GiHsp60 (receptor) using rigid docking method as implemented in DOCK software (grid_vdw = − 34.73 kcal mol−1 and grid_es = −3.28 kcal mol−1). While the secondary structure of the receptor is represented as cartoon, the ligand is shown as spheres. Box dimension of x = 38.487 Å; y = 47.249 Å; and z = 41.766 Å (coloured as red) enclosing the docked complex was generated with the box length set to 16 Å in the input file showbox.in. The image was generated using PyMOL package. (PNG 913 kb)
Fig. S2
Lowest energy structure of GiHsp60_t-SOM complex generated at the end of 3021 ps of simulation using AMBER package (energy of −216,120.6504 kcal mol−1). Note the homology modelled protein- ligand complex is surrounded by water molecules. The image was generated using PyMol. (PNG 3174 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mothay, D., Ramesh, K.V. Molecular dynamics simulation of homology modeled glomalin related soil protein (Rhizophagus irregularis) complexed with soil organic matter model. Biologia 76, 699–709 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00590-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00590-z