Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 74, Issue 12, pp 1613–1619 | Cite as

Do wind turbines impact plant community properties in mountain region?

  • Ileana Pătru-StupariuEmail author
  • Ana-Maria Calotă
  • Mathieu Santonja
  • Paulina Anastasiu
  • Ioana Stoicescu
  • Iovu Adrian Biriş
  • Mihai-Sorin Stupariu
  • Alexandre Buttler
Short Communication
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The emergence of renewable energy infrastructures calls for a better understanding of their impact on biodiversity. The aim of the present study was to investigate in a mountain region the impact of a wind turbine on plant communities in their vicinity. A field survey was conducted in a wind farm situated in the Southern Romanian Carpathians, five years after the turbines were installed. We tested for the effects of the presence of the turbine and the distance to the turbine on plant species richness, on five plant ecological indicators and on the quality of the pastures. Overall, 33 plant species belonging to 16 families were recorded, and among them 21 were recorded in both the presence and the absence of wind turbine. The presence of a turbine did not affect the structure of the plant community, as the majority of the plots exhibited similar plant species richness and composition. Finally, the values of the ecological indicators and the pasture quality were not altered by the presence of the turbine. Such analyses could be extended over longer time periods so as to capture potential long-term effects and by integrating other environmental factors such as microclimatic conditions or soil properties.

Keywords

Wind energy Mountain pasture Plant ecological indicators Pastoral value 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Swiss Enlargement Contribution in the framework of the Romanian-Swiss Research Programme, project WindLand, project code: IZERZO 142168/1 and 22 RO-CH/RSRP. We thank the reviewers for the very constructive comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11756_2019_333_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1147 kb)

References

  1. Armstrong A, Waldron S, Whitaker J, Ostle NJ (2014) Wind farm and solar park effects on plant-soil carbon cycling: uncertain impacts of changes in ground-level microclimate. Glob Change Biol 20:1699–1706.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baidya Roy S, Traiteur JJ (2010) Impact of wind farms on surface air temperatures. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107(42):17899–17904.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000493107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baidya Roy S, Pacala SW, Walko RL (2004) Can large wind farms affect local meteorology? J Geophys Res 109:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastos R, Pinhancos A, Santos M, Fernandes RF, Vicente JR, Morinha F, Honrado JP, Travassos P, Barros P, Cabral JA (2016) Evaluating the regional cumulative impact of wind farms on birds: how can spatially explicit dynamic modelling improve impact assessments and monitoring? J Appl Ecol 53:1330–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand AJ, Peinke J, Mann J (2011) Turbulence and wind turbines. J Phys Conf Ser 318(7):072005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/318/7/072005 (access date 22.02.2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton T, Jenkins N, Sharpe D, Bossanyi E (2011) Wind energy handbook. Wiley, Second EditionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buttler A, Kohler F, Gillet F (2009) The Swiss mountain wooded pastures: patterns and processes. In: Rigueiro-Rodriguez a, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR (eds), agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, advances in agroforestry series, New York, pp. 377-396Google Scholar
  8. Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention, ETS 176. Available online at https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680080621 (access date 22.02.2019)
  9. Davis KM, Nguyen MN, McClung MR, Moran MD (2018) A comparison of the impacts of wind energy and unconventional gas development on land-use and ecosystem services: an example from the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma, USA. Environ Manag 61:796–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Didham, RK (2010). Ecological Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation. In eLS, (Ed.).  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0021904
  11. Dodd MB, McGowan AW, Power IL, Thorrold BS (2005) Effects of variation in shade level, shade duration and light quality on perennial pastures. New Zealand J Agric Res 48(4):531–543.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2005.9513686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dragomir G, Şerban A, Năstase G, Brezeanu A (2016) Wind energy in Romania: a review from 2009 to 2016. Renew Sust Energ Rev 64:129–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durau C, Moisuc A, Sarateanu V (2010) Approaches on floristic composition and pastoral value (Western Romania). Res J Agric Sci 42(1):2008–2011Google Scholar
  14. EEA (2005) European Environmental Agency. Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy. Available online at https://www.cbd.int/doc/nbsap/rbsap/peblds-rbsap.pdf (access date 22.02.2019)
  15. EEA (2009) European environmental agency. Europe’s onshore and offshore wind energy potential. An assessment of environmental and economic constraintsGoogle Scholar
  16. Egli T, Bolliger J, Kienast F (2017) Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs with wind electricity production in Switzerland. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:863–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EIA (2012) Environmental Impact Assessment for the wind farm Topleţ. Available online http://apmcs-old.anpm.ro/files/APM%20CS/Rapoarte/RaportEIMParcEolianToplet.pdf (access date 22.02.2019)
  18. Ellenberg H, Weber THE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulissen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa (Indicator values of plants in Central Europe). Gottingen, Scripta Geobotanica, XVIII, Verlag Erich Goltze KG, Göttingen [in German]Google Scholar
  19. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang A, Peringer A, Stupariu MS, Pătru-Stupariu I, Buttler A, Golay F, Porte-Agel F (2018) Shifts in wind energy potential following land-use driven vegetation dynamics in complex terrains. Sci Total Environ 639:374–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.083 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gavazov K, Ingrisch J, Hasibeder R, Mills RTE, Buttler A, Gleixner G, Pumpanen J, Bahn M (2017) Winter ecology of a subalpine grassland: effects of snow removal on soil respiration, microbial structure and function. Sci Total Environ 590:316–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillet F (2008) Modelling vegetation dynamics in heterogeneous pasture-woodland landscapes. Ecol Model 217:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gobat JM, Duckert O, Gallandat JD (1989) Quelques relations "microtopographie-sols- végétation" dans les pelouses pseudo-alpines du Jura suisse : exemples d'un système naturel et d'un système anthropisé. Bull Soc Neuch Sc Nat 112:5–17.  https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-89297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartel T, Dorresteijn I, Klein C, Mathe O, Moga C, Oellerer K, Roellig M, von Wehrden H, Fischer J (2013) Wood-pastures in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe: characteristics, management and status. Biol Conserv 166:267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hastik R, Basso S, Geitner C, Haida C, Poljanec A, Portaccio A, Vrscaj B, Walzer C (2015) Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:608–623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huber N, Hergert R, Price B, Zach C, Hersperger A, Putz M, Kienast F, Bolliger J (2017) Renewable energy sources: conflicts and opportunities in a changing landscape. Reg Environ Chang 17(4):1241–1255.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1098-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Layne MK (2018) What environmental art can teach us about wind farms: exploring the boundaries of cultural aesthetics in Scottish landscapes. Landsc Res 43(2):248–259.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1318118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li G, Zhang CH, Zhang L, Zhang M (2016) Wind farm effect on grassland vegetation due to its influence on the range, intensity and variation of wind direction, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, (IGARSS), pp. 1304–1306Google Scholar
  29. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Maruşca T, Mocanu V, Has EC, Tod MA, Andreoiu AC, Dragoş MM, Blaj VA, Ene TA, Silistru D, Ichim E, Zevedei PM, Constantinescu CS, Tod SV (2014) Ghid de întocmire a amenajamentelor pastorale. Editura Capolavoro, Braşov [in Romanian]Google Scholar
  31. Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pătru-Stupariu I, Stupariu MS, Tudor CA, Grădinaru SR, Gavrilidis A, Kienast F, Hersperger AM (2015) Landscape fragmentation in Romania’s southern Carpathians: testing a European assessment with local data. Landscape Urban Plan 143:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peringer A, Schulze KA, Pătru-Stupariu I, Stupariu MS, Rosenthal G, Gillet F, Buttler A (2016) Multi-scale feedbacks between tree regeneration traits and herbivore behavior explain structure of pasture-woodland mosaics. Landsc Ecol 31:913–927.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0308-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petersen EL, Mortensen NG, Landberg L, Hojstrup J, Frank HP (1998) Wind power meteorology. Part I: climate and turbulence. Wind Energ 1:25–45.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1824(199804)1:1+<25::AID-WE4>3.0.CO;2-D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Porté-Agel F, Wu YT, Lu H, Conzemius RJ (2011) Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow through wind turbines and wind farms. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 99(4):154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pruett CL, Patten MA, Wolfe DH (2009) It’s not easy being green: wind energy and a declining grassland bird. Bioscience 59:257–262.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.3.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pustkowiak S, Banaszak-Cibicka W, Mielczarek LE, Tryjanowski P, Skorka P (2018) The association of windmills with conservation of pollinating insects and wild plants in homogeneous farmland of western Poland. Environ Sci Pollut R 25(7):6273–6284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riesch F, Stroh HG, Tonn B, Isselstein J (2018) Soil pH and phosphorus drive species composition and richness in semi-natural heathlands and grasslands unaffected by twentieth-century agricultural intensification. Plant Ecol Divers 11(2):239–253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0864-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robroek BJM, Heijboer A, Jassey VEJ, Hefting MM, Rouwenhorst TG, Buttler A, Bragazza L (2013) Snow cover manipulation effects on microbial community structure and soil chemistry in a mountain bog. Plant Soil 369(1-2):151–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1547-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saidur R, Rahim NA, Islam MR, Solangi KH (2011) Environmental impact of wind energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:2423–2430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sârbu I, Ştefan N, Oprea A (2013) Plante vasculare din România. Determinator ilustrat de teren, Editura VictorBVictor [in Romanian]Google Scholar
  42. Silva C, Cabral JA, Hughes SJ, Santos M (2017) A modelling framework to predict bat activity patterns on wind farms: an outline of possible applications on mountain ridges of North Portugal. Sci Total Environ 581-582:337–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.135 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Šrůtek M, Doležal J (2003) Functional interdependence between climatic factors, topographic processes and spatial patterns of species richness in mountain areas: a special case or the general pattern? Biologia 58:823–832Google Scholar
  44. Tang BJ, Wu DH, Zhao X, Zhou T, Zhao WQ, Wei H (2017) The observed impacts of wind farms on local vegetation growth in northern China. Remote Sens-Basel 9(4):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thayer RL, Freeman CM (1987) Altamont - public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape Urban Plan 14:379–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(87)90051-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Urziceanu M, Sesan TE, Anastasiu P (2018) Rare and threatened vascular plants in the area of wind farms in Natura 2000 site ROSCI0060. Dealurile Agighiolului Acta Med Marisiensis 64:3Google Scholar
  47. Wang SF, Wang SC, Smith P (2015) Quantifying impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services at local and global scales. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1424–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xia G, Zhou LM (2017) Detecting wind farm impacts on local vegetation growth in Texas and Illinois using MODIS vegetation greenness measurements. Remote Sens-Basel 9:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhou L, Tian Y, Baidya Roy S, Thorncroft C, Bosart LF, Hu Y (2012) Impacts of wind farms on land surface temperature. Nat Clim Chang 2(7):539–543.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ileana Pătru-Stupariu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ana-Maria Calotă
    • 3
  • Mathieu Santonja
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Paulina Anastasiu
    • 7
  • Ioana Stoicescu
    • 1
  • Iovu Adrian Biriş
    • 8
  • Mihai-Sorin Stupariu
    • 1
    • 9
  • Alexandre Buttler
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Research of University of Bucharest, ICUB; Transdisciplinary Research Centre Landscape-Territory-Information Systems, CeLTISBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Regional Geography and Environment, Faculty of GeographyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Faculty of Geography, Doctoral School Simion MehedinţiUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Ecological Systems Laboratory (ECOS)School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), EPFLLausanneSwitzerland
  5. 5.Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSLLausanneSwitzerland
  6. 6.Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBEMarseilleFrance
  7. 7.Faculty of BiologyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  8. 8.University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of BucharestBucharestRomania
  9. 9.Faculty of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations