Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 74, Issue 8, pp 1001–1010 | Cite as

Habitat-wise composition and foraging guilds of avian community in a suburban landscape of lower Gangetic plains, West Bengal, India

  • Shiladitya Mukhopadhyay
  • Subhendu MazumdarEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Documentation of avian assemblages in different ecosystems is very important from environmental monitoring perspective. We assessed the species richness and foraging guilds of birds in different habitats of a suburban area in lower Gangetic plains (Bongaon, West Bengal, India) where no such studies have been done so far. Overall, 119 species of birds were recorded during the study period (June 2015 – May 2016) for the entire study area. Maximum species belonged to order Passeriformes (52 species). Based on species richness of birds, the dendrogram revealed two distinct clusters of habitats, one containing perennial wetland, riverine mixed vegetation and seasonal wetland, and the other with residential area and plantation forest. Generalized linear model (GLM) with negative binomial distribution and log-link revealed that species richness of birds significantly varied between different habitats and seasons. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering using avian species richness revealed that the habitats associated with water bodies fall under separate cluster and had higher species richness than the cluster containing habitats without water bodies. Maximum bird species was noticed in perennial wetland followed by riverine mixed vegetation, seasonal wetland, residential area and plantation forest. Richness of insectivores was highest in perennial wetland and riverine mixed vegetation, number of carnivorous species was maximum in seasonal wetlands, while omnivores showed the highest richness in residential area and plantation forests. This area supports two near threatened (NT) species namely black-headed ibis (Threskiornis melanocephalus) and Alexandrine parakeet (Psittacula eupatria). Our study is the first effort towards assessment of habitat-wise species richness of birds in this suburban area which supports good number of avifauna. Findings of the present study could serve as an important baseline to assess the impact of urbanization and habitat change on avian species richness in this suburban landscape, and might also be useful in adopting sustainable and bird-friendly management plan for this area.

Keywords

Avifauna Species richness Guild Habitat Suburban India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Sanjay Podder of Barasat Government College for his constant encouragement. Permission and infrastructural facilities provided by Principal, Barasat Government College and Principal, Shibpur Dinobundhoo Institution (College) are gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks are due to Mr. Sourav Mondal and Mr. Sourabh Biswas for their help during the surveys.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement

This paper contains findings of our original research. There are no potential conflicts of interest (financial or nonfinancial) and no animal was harmed during the study. All applicable national and/or international guidelines for animal ethics were followed. The expenses during the research were borne by the authors and not funded by any external agency.

References

  1. Ali S, Ripley SD (1987) Compact handbook of birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Srilanka. Oxford University Press, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Mousawi AH, Al-Naib FAG (1975) Allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus microtheca F. Muell. J Univ Kuwait (Sci) 2:59–66Google Scholar
  3. Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 67:9–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balaram P (2005) Insect of tropical streams. Curr Sci 89(6):914Google Scholar
  5. Baral HS, Inskipp C (2005) Important bird areas in Nepal: key sites for conservation. Bird Conservation Nepal, Kathmandu and Birdlife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Batzer DP, Resh VH (1992) Macroinvertebrates of a California seasonal wetland and responses to experimental habitat manipulation. Wetlands 12(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batzer DP, McGee M, Resh VH, Smith RR (1993) Characteristics of invertebrates consumed by mallards and prey response to wetland flooding schedules. Wetlands 13(1):41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beissinger SR, Osborne DR (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84(1):75–83.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1367825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bensizerara D, Chenchouni H, Bachir AS, Houhamdi M (2013) Ecological status interactions for assessing bird diversity in relation to a heterogeneous landscape structure. Avian Biol Res 6(1):67–77.  https://doi.org/10.3184/175815513X13577344603957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. BirdLife International (2003) Saving Asia’s threatened birds: a guide for government and civil society. BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6(2):506–519.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2269387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blair RB (2001) Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? The loss of diversity through invasion and extinct. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds) Biotic homogenization: the loss of diversity through invasion and extinct. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, pp 33–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1261-5_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blair RB, Johnson EM (2008) Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban-rural habitat network: points of local invasion and extinction? Landsc Ecol 23(10):1157–1169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9267-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolger DT, Scott TA, Rotenberry JT (1997) Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern Callifornia. Conserv Biol 11(2):406–421.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96307.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colwell MA, Taft OW (2000) Waterbird communities in managed wetlands of varying water depth. Waterbirds 23(1):45–55Google Scholar
  17. Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115(3):451–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00162-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das B, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Causes of flood by Indian River a case study of Transboundary River Icchamati in Gangetic Delta. IJARCSEE 1(7):277–292Google Scholar
  19. Das CR, Mondal NK, Aditya P, Datta JK, Banerjee A, Das K (2012) Allelopathic potentialities of leachates of leaf litter of some selected tree species on gram seeds under laboratory conditions. Asian J Exp Biol Sci 3(1):59–65Google Scholar
  20. Datta T (2011) Human interference and avifaunal diversity of two wetlands of Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India. JoTT 3(12):2253–2262Google Scholar
  21. del Hoyo J, Collar NJ, Christie DA, Elliott A, Fishpool LDC (2014) Illustrated checklist of the birds of the world. Lynx Edicions, Spain and BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. del Moral R, Muller CH (1970) The allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Am Midl Nat 83(1):254–282.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2424020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. del Moral R, Willis RJ, Ashton DH (1978) Suppression of coastal heath vegetation by Eucalyptus baxteri. Austra J Bot 26(2):203–219.  https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9780203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DuBowy PJ (1988) Waterfowl communities and seasonal environments: temporal variability in interspecific competition. Ecology 69(5):1439–1453.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1940613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edwards NT, Otis DL (1999) Avian communities and habitat relationships in South Carolina Piedmont beaver ponds. Am Midl Nat 141(1):158–172. https://doi.org/10.1674/00030031(1999)141[0158:ACAHRI]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  26. Elphick CS, Oring LW (1998) Winter management of Californian rice fields for waterbirds. J Appl Ecol 35(1):95–108.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00274.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Euliss NH, Grodhaus G (1987) Management of midges and other invertebrates for waterfowl wintering in California. Calif Fish Game 73(4):238–243Google Scholar
  28. Evelyn MJ, Stiles DA, Young RA (2004) Conservation of bats in suburban landscapes: roost selection by Myotis yumanensis in a residential area in California. Biol Conserv 115(3):463–473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00163-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Froneman A, Mangnall MJ, Little RM, Crowe TM (2001) Waterbird assemblages and associated habitat characteristics of farm ponds in the Western Cape, South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 10(2):251–270.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008904421948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450050508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gonzalez-Gajardo A, Sepulveda PV, Schlatter R (2009) Waterbird assemblages and habitat characteristics in wetlands: influence of temporal variability on species-habitat relationships. Waterbirds 32(2):225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1675/063.032.0203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2011) Estimating species richness. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Frontiers in measuring biodiversity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 39–54Google Scholar
  33. Gregory RD, Noble D, Field R, Marchant J, Raven M, Gibbons DW (2003) Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hungarica 12–13:11–24Google Scholar
  34. Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T (2011) Birds of the Indian subcontinent, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press & Christopher Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH, Jones KB (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15(6):1893–1905.  https://doi.org/10.1890/05-5221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hutto RL (1985) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press. Inc., MontanaGoogle Scholar
  37. Jetz W, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP (2007) Projected impacts of climate change and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol 5(6):1211–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jokimaki J, Suhonen J (1998) Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan 39(4):253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00089-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Khan RA (2002) The ecology and faunal diversity of two floodplain ox-bow lakes of south-eastern West Bengal. Rec Zool Surv India Occ Paper No 195:1–57Google Scholar
  40. Lillie RA, Evrard JO (1994) Influence of macroinvertebrates and macrophytes on waterfowl utilization of wetlands in the prairie pothole region of northwestern Wisconsin. Hydrobiologia 279(1):235–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahabal A (2005) Aves. In: Director, Zoological Survey of India (ed) Fauna of Western Himalaya (Part 2). Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, pp 275–339Google Scholar
  42. Maher M (1984) Benthic studies of waterfowl breeding habitat in South-Western New South Wales. I. The fauna. Aust J Mar Freshwat Res 35(1):85–96.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9840085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Majumder R, Ghosh DK, Mandal AC, Patra P, Bhunia GS (2017) An appraisal of geomorphic characteristics and flood susceptibility zone using remote sensing and GIS: a case study in Bongaon subdivision, North 24 Parganas (West Bengal), India. Int J Res Geogr 3(4):32–40.  https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-8685.0304005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsden SJ, Whiffin M, Galetti M (2001) Bird diversity and abundance in forest fragments and Eucalyptus plantations around an Atlantic forest reserve, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 10(5):737–751.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016669118956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian conservation and ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 19–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian conservation and ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mazumdar S (2017) Composition of avian communities in a human-modified wetland Okhla bird sanctuary, India: with notes on conservation initiatives. Proc Zool Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-017-0239-6
  48. Mazumdar S, Saha GK (2016) Wetlands in urban landscapes: problems and potentials. In: Saha GK (ed) Wetland: crisis and options. Astral International Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 385–400Google Scholar
  49. Mazumdar S, Ghosh P, Saha GK (2005) Diversity and behaviour of waterfowl in Santragachi Jheel, West Bengal, India during winter season. Indian Birds 1:68–69Google Scholar
  50. Mazumdar S, Mookherjee K, Saha GK (2007) Migratory waterbirds of wetlands of southern West Bengal, India. Indian Birds 3:42–45Google Scholar
  51. Mazumdar S, Mookherjee K, Saha GK (2008) Diversity and dominance of migratory waterbirds in six wetlands of southern West Bengal, India. In: Zoological research in human welfare. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, pp 161–166Google Scholar
  52. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  53. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (2001) Biotic homogenization: a sequential and selective process. In: Lockwood JL, Mckinney ML (eds) Biotic homogenization. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  54. McKinney RA, Raposa KB, Cournoyer RM (2011) Wetlands as habitat in urbanizing landscapes: patterns of bird abundance and occupancy. Landsc Urban Plan 100(1–2):144–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16(2):330–337.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mondal I, Bandyopadhyay J, Paul AK (2016) Estimation of hydrodynamic pattern change of Ichamati River using HEC RAS model, West Bengal, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0138-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Murkin HR, Batt BDJ (1987) The interactions of vertebrates and invertebrates in peatlands and marshes. In: Rosenberg DM, Danks HV (eds) Aquatic insects of peatlands and marshes of Canada. Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa, pp 15–30Google Scholar
  59. Nummi P (1993) Food-niche relationships of sympatric mallards and green-winged teals. Can J Zool 71(1):49–55.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olden JD, Douglas ME, Douglas MR (2005) The human dimensions of biotic homogenization. Conserv Biol 19(6):2036–2038.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00288.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Owen M, Black JM (1990) Waterfowl ecology. Blackie and Son Ltd., GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  62. Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1(4):185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018531712889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32(1):127–157.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Praveen J, Jaypal R, Pittie A (2016) A checklist of the birds of India. Indian Birds 11:113–172Google Scholar
  65. Rajpar MN, Zakaria M (2011) Bird species abundance and their correlationship with microclimate and habitat variables at natural wetland reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. Int J Zool 2011:Article ID 758573.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/758573
  66. Rajpar MN, Zakaria M (2015) Bird abundance and its relationship with microclimate and habitat variables in open-area and shrub habitats in Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. J Anim Plant Sci 25(1):114–124Google Scholar
  67. Riffel SK, Keas BE, Burton TM (2001) Area and habitat relationships of birds in great lakes coastal wet meadows. Wetlands 21(4):492–507. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0492:AAHROB]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  68. Rosenberg KV, Terrill SB, Rosenberg GH (1987) Value of suburban habitats to desert riparian birds. Wilson Bull 99(4):642–654Google Scholar
  69. Rudrappa T (1984) Allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus plantation. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Eucalyptus plantation, June 29 1984. Bangalore, India, pp 109–111Google Scholar
  70. Saha M (2015) Human interference in the resource utilization of Bongaon sub-division in North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal. RJSSM 5(8):120–129Google Scholar
  71. Sánchez-Zapata JA, Anadón JD, Carrete M, Giménez A, Navarro J, Villacorta C, Botella F (2005) Breeding waterbirds in relation to artificial pond attributes: implications for the design of irrigation facilities. Biodivers Conserv 14(7):1627–1639.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0534-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sekercioglu CH (2006) Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol Evol 21(8):464–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sivaramakrishnan KG, Venkataraman K, Moorthy RK, Subramanian KA, Utkarsh G (2000) Aquatic insect diversity and ubiquity of the streams of the Western Ghats, India. J Indian Inst Sci 80(6):537–552Google Scholar
  74. Thakur ML, Mattu VK, Lal H, Sharma VN, Raj H, Thakur V (2010) Avifauna of Arki Hills, Solan (Himachal Pradesh), India. Indian Birds 5(6):162–166Google Scholar
  75. United Nations (2009) World urbanization prospects: the 2009 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United NationsGoogle Scholar
  76. Urfi AJ (1996) On some new breeding records of waterbirds from the Delhi region. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 93:94–95Google Scholar
  77. Urfi AJ (1997) The significance of Delhi Zoo for wild waterbirds, with special reference to painted stork Mycteria leucocephala. Forktail 12:87–98Google Scholar
  78. Veech JA, Small MF, Baccus JT (2011) The effect of habitat on the range expansion of a native and an introduced bird species. J Biogeogr 38(1):69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02397.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Velasquez CR (1992) Managing artificial saltpans as a waterbird habitat: species responses to water level manipulation. Colon Waterbirds 15:43–55.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1521353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Western D, Grimsdell JJR (1979) Measuring the distribution of animals in relation to the environment (Handbook No. 2). African Wildlife Leadership Foundation, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  81. Zárate-Ovando B, Palacios E, Reyes-Bonilla H (2008) Community structure and association of waterbirds with spatial heterogeneity in the Bahia Magdalena-Almejas wetland complex, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop 56(1):371–389.  https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v56i1.5532 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Post Graduate Department of ZoologyBarasat Government CollegeNorth 24 ParganasIndia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyShibpur Dinobundhoo Institution (College)HowrahIndia

Personalised recommendations