Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of environmental factors on the mayfly communities of headwater streams in the Pieniny Mountains (West Carpathians)

  • Section Zoology
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of the species composition of mayfly communities in connection with environmental parameters was made in headwater streams of the Pieniny Mts. The rhithral zone is inhabited maximally by 19 mayfly species. In most of the streams studied the mayfly communities were found to be similar, however the vertical zonation which reflected human impact was visible (NMDS analysis). The main factors responsible for mayfly communities at all the sites studied were stream regulation and organic pollution, followed by type of bottom substrate (pebble and gravel), riparian vegetation (shrubs), pH and water temperature. At undisturbed sites the most important factors were pH, substrate type, distance from the source, current velocity and riparian vegetation (CCA analysis). Analysis of mayfly communities and environmental characteristics in different seasons showed that occurrence of mayfly species varied substantially depending on the season. Only in early spring and autumn do mayfly communities occur which are dependent on many environmental factors, the most significant of which are substrate type, phosphate, distance from source and altitude (CCA analysis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan J.D. & Castillo M.M. 2007. Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters. 2nd ed. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 436 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4020-5583-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestrini R., Cazzola M. & Buffagni A. 2004. Characterizing hydromorphological features of selected Italian rivers: a comparative application of environmental indices. Hydrobiologia 516(1–3): 365–379. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025276.19872.ee

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauernfeind E. & Moog O. 2000. Mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) and the assessment of ecological integrity: a methodological approach. Hydrobiologia 422/423(0): 71–83. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017090504518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitenmoser-Würsten C. & Sartori M. 1995. Distribution, diversity, life cycle and growth of a mayfly community in a prealpine stream system (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Hydrobiologia 308(2): 85–101. DOI: 10.1007/BF00007393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain J.E. 1982. Biology of mayflies. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 27: 119–147. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn S.E. & Arthington A.H. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manage. 30(4): 492–507. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burian S. 1997. An analysis of the distribution and diversity of the Ephemeroptera of Mine, USA, pp. 127–138. In: Landolt P. & Sartori M. (eds), Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera. Biology — Ecology — Systematics, MTL, Fribourg, Switzerland, 569 pp. ISBN: 2940187010, 9782940187010

    Google Scholar 

  • Death R.G. & Joy M.K. 2004. Invertebrate community structure in streams of the Manawatu-Wanganui region, New Zealand: the roles of catchment versus reach scale influences. Freshwater Biol. 49(8): 982–997. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01243.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Effenberger M., Sailer G., Townsed C.R. & Matthaei C.D. 2006. Local disturbance history and habitat parameters influence the microdistribution of stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 51(2): 312–332. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01502.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn D.S. & Poff N.L. 2005. Variability and convergence in benthic communities along the longitudinal gradients of four physically similar Rocky Mountain streams. Freshwater Biol. 50(2): 243–261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01320.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füreder L., Vacha C., Amprosi K., Bühler S., Hansen C.M.E. & Mortiz C. 2002. Reference conditions of Alpine streams. Physical habitat and ecology. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2(2): 279–294. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020171129760

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon N.D., McMahon T.A. & Finlayson B.L. 1994. Stream Hydrology, An Introduction for Ecologist. Wiley & Sons, New York, 526 pp. ISBN: 0471955051, 9780471955054

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins C.P., Murphy M.L. & Anderson N.H. 1982. Effects of canopy, substrate composition and gradient on the structure of macroinvertebrate communities in Cascade Range streams of Oregon. Ecology 63(6): 1840–1856. DOI: 10.2307/1940125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J., Parviainen J., Paavola R., Jehle M., Louhi P. & Muotka T. 2005. Characterising macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position. Hydrobiologia 539(1): 121–130. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-004-3914-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hieber M., Robinson T., Uehlinger U. & Ward J.V. 2005. A comparison of benthic invertebrate assemblages among different types of alpine streams. Freshwater Biol. 50(12): 2087–2100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01460.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L. & Gage S. 1997. Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystem. Freshwater Biol. 37(1): 113–132. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00156.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kłonowska-Olejnik M. 2000. Jetki (Ephemeroptera) [Mayflies (Ephemeroptera)], pp. 137–141. In: Razowski J. (ed.), Flora i fauna Pienin. Monografie Pienińskie. Tom 1. [Flora and fauna of the Pieniny Mountains] Pieniński Park Narodowy, Krościenko nad Dunajcem, 333 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostarkiewicz L. 1982. Hydrography, pp. 70–93. In: Zarzycki K. (ed.), Pieniny. Przyroda w obliczu zmian [The Nature of the Pieniny Mountains in the face of changes], PAN, Zakład Ochrony Przyrody i Zasobów Naturalnych, PWN, Warszawa-Kraków, 578 pp. ISBN: 8301032502 9788301032500

    Google Scholar 

  • Kownacki A., Dumnicka E., Galas J., Kawecka B. & Wojtan K. 1997. Ecological characteristics of a high mountain lake outlet stream (Tatra Mts, Poland). Arch. Hydrobiol. 139(1): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krno I., Šporka F., Štefková E., Tirjaková E., Bitušik P., Bulánková E., Lukáš J., Illešová D., Derka T., Tomajka J. & Černý J. 2006. Ecological study of a high-mountain stream ecosystem (Hincov potok, High Tatra Mountains, Slovakia). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 69: 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krno I., Šporka F., Pastuchová Z., Derka T., Čiamporová-Zatovičová Z., Bulánková E., Hamerlík L. & Illešová D. 2007. Assessment of the ecological status of streams in two Carpathian subregions. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 92(4–5): 564–581. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200610996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi M.A. & Comiti F. 2003. Local scouring and morphological adjustments in steep channels with check-dam sequences. Geomorphology 55(1–4): 97–109. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00134-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz A., Feld C.K. & Hering D. 2004. Typology of streams in Germany based on benthic invertebrates. Ecoregions, zonation, geology and substrate. Limnologica 34(4): 379–389. DOI: 10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80007-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall G.W., Petersen R.C. & Nimz C.F. 1985. Species richness in streams of different size from the same drainage basin. Am. Nat. 125(1): 16–38. DOI: 10.1086/284326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paller M.H., Specht W.L. & Dyer S.A. 2006. Effects of stream size on taxa richness and other commonly used benthic bioassessment metrics. Hydrobiologia 568(1): 309–316. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0208-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth N.E., Allan J.D. & Erickson D.L. 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol. 11(3): 141–156. DOI: 10.1007/BF02447513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šmilauer P. 2002. WinKyst 1.0, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. http://www.canodraw.com/winkyst.htm (accessed 15.01.2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldán T., Zahrádková S., Helešic J., Dušek L. & Landa V. 1998. Distributional and quantitative patterns of Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera in the Czech Republic: a possibility of detection of long term environmental changes of aquatic biotopes. Folia Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Masaryk. Brun. Biol. 98, 298 pp. ISBN: 80-210-1870-4

  • Sowa R. 1975. Ecology and biogeography of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of running waters in the Polish part of the Carpathians. Distribution and quantitative analysis. Acta Hydrobiol. 17(3): 223–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svitok M. 2006. Structure and spatial variability of mayfly (Ephemeroptera) communities in the upper Hron River basin. Biologia 61(5): 547–554. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-006-0089-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.F.J. & Prentice I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271–317. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2504(03)34003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.F.J. & Šmilauer P. 2003. CANOCO Reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.52). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, 353 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend C.R., Dolédec S., Norris R., Peacock K. & Arbuckle C. 2003. The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables. description and prediction. Freshwater Biol. 48(5): 768–785. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J.V. 1992. Aquatic Insect Ecology. Biology and Habitat. John Wiley & Sons, New York-Singapore, 438 pp. ISBN: 0471550078, 9780471550075

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. & Cushing C.E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37(1): 130–137. DOI: 10.1139/f80-017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman M.J. 1954. A method of sampling coarse river bed material. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 35(6): 951–956. DOI: 10.1029/TR035i006p00951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora-Muñoz C., Sanchez-Ortega A. & Alba-Tercedor J. 1993. Physicochemical factors that determine the distribution of mayflies and stoneflies in a high-mountain stream in Southern Europe (Sierra Nevada, Southern Spain). Aquat. Insects 15(1): 11–20. DOI: 10.1080/01650429309361495

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedleina 33/19, 30-009, Kraków, Poland

    Małgorzata Kłonowska-Olejnik

  2. Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387, Kraków, Poland

    Tomasz Skalski

Authors
  1. Małgorzata Kłonowska-Olejnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomasz Skalski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata Kłonowska-Olejnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kłonowska-Olejnik, M., Skalski, T. The effect of environmental factors on the mayfly communities of headwater streams in the Pieniny Mountains (West Carpathians). Biologia 69, 498–507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0334-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0334-3

Key words

Search

Navigation