, Volume 68, Issue 5, pp 950–960 | Cite as

The influence of environmental variables on larval growth of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in natural and deforested streams

Section Zoology


A total 14 streams located in the Tatra Mts (Slovakia) were investigated. The studied river basins have different deforestation range (0–45.5%) influenced by windstorm. Daily and annual water temperature suggested that in streams overflowing through the area deforested by windstorm the temperature was higher than in selected non-disturbed streams. Higher average nutrient concentrations in samples from these streams are connected with nutrient mobilization from disturbed forest soils after the windstorm. Most of the damaged streams have higher trophic status, including POM and biofilms. The growth of the most abundant larvae increases with deforestation. Growth of species Leuctra rauscheri, Protonemura Montana, and Perlodes intricatus correlates with the sum of daily temperatures over a given time interval. Growth of species Brachyptera seticornis, Leuctra autumnalis and Isoperla sudetica are affected by stream trophy.

Key words

land cover windstorm deforestation temperature regime foods alpine stream ecosystem trophic status growth of stoneflies 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AQEM consortium 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. 2002. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0. February 2002. Google Scholar
  2. Allan J.D. 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall, London, 388 pp. ISBN: 0412355302, 9780412355301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan J.D. 2004. Influence of land use and landscape setting on the ecological status of rivers. Limnetica 23(3–4): 187–198.Google Scholar
  4. Allan J.D., Palmer M.A. & Poff N.L. 2005. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems, Chapter 17, pp. 274–290. In: Lovejoy T.E. & Hannah L. (eds), Climate Change and Biodiversity, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 418 pp. ISBN: 0300104251Google Scholar
  5. Benke A.C. 1993. Concepts and patterns of invertebrate production in running waters. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 25: 15–38.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman R.W. 1979. Nearctic stonefly genera as indicators of ecological parameters (Plecoptera: Insecta). Western North American Naturalist 39(3): 241–244.Google Scholar
  7. Briers R.A., Gee J.H.R & Geoghegan R. 2004. Effects of the North Atlantic Oscillation on growth and phenology of stream insects. Ecography 27(6): 811–817. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.04005.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brittain J.E. & Lillehammer A. 1987. Variability in the rate of egg development of the stonefly, Nemoura cinerea (Plecoptera). Freshwater Biol. 17(3): 565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulánková E., Halgoš J., Krno I., Bitušík P., Illéšová D., Lukáš J., Derka T. & Šporka, F. 2002. The influence of different thermal regime on the structure of coenoses of stenothermal hydrobionts inmountain streams. Acta Zool. Univ. Comen., Bratislava 44(1): 95–101.Google Scholar
  10. Bulánková E., Kalaninová D. & Šporka F. 2013. River morphology of mountain streams influenced by an extreme windstorm in the High Tatra Mountains (northern Slovakia). Biologia 68(3): 487–500. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-013-0166-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caisse D. 2006. The thermal regime of rivers: A review. Freshwater Biol. 51(8): 1389–1406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01597.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleischer P. 2011. Pokalamitný výskum vo Vysokých Tatrách — ciele, metódy a charakteristika lokalít. Štúdie o TANAP 10(43): 7–12.Google Scholar
  13. Füreder L. 2007. Life at the edge: Habitat condition and bottom fauna of alpine running waters. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 92(4–5): 491–513. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200610987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurtz E.G. & Wallace J.B. 1984. Substrate-mediated response of stream invertebrates to disturbance. Ecology 65: 1556–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haidekerr A. & Hering D. 2008. Relationship between benthic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera) and temperature in small and medium-sized streams in Germany: A multivariate study. Aquat. Ecol. 42(3): 463–481. DOI: 10.1007/s10452-007-9097-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heineman D.R. & Knight A.W. 1975. The influence of temperature on bioenergetics of the carnivorous stonefly nemph, Acrioneuria californica Banks (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Ecology 56: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hynes H.B.N. 1961. The effect of water-level fluctuations on littoral fauna. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 14: 652–656.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson R.K., Furse M.T., Hering D. & Sandin L. 2007. Ecological relationships spatial scale: implications for designing catchment-level monitoring programmes. Freshwater Biol. 52(5): 939–958. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01692.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamler E. 1965. Thermal conditions in mountain waters and their influence on the distribution of Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera larvae. Ekol. Pol. 12: 1–38.Google Scholar
  20. Krno I. 1995. Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Vtáčnik mountains (West Carpathians). Biologia 50(2): 133–142.Google Scholar
  21. Krno I. 1997. Production and distribution of stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Slovakia, pp. 199–204. In: Landolt P. & Sartori M. (eds), Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera: Biology-Ecology-Systematics, Mauron + Tiguely and Lachat SA, Fribourg, 569 pp. ISBN: 2940187010, 9782940187010Google Scholar
  22. Krno I. 2007. Impact of human activities on stonefly (Insecta, Plecoptera) ecological metrics in the Hron River (Slovakia). Biologia 62(4): 446–457. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-007-0087-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krno I. 2010. A new model estimating stonefly species production in the West Carpathian torrents. Biologia 65(3): 537–544. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-010-0050-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krno I. & Šporka F. 2003. Influence of environmental factors on production of stoneflies (Plecoptera) from the Hincov brook (High Tatra, Slovakia). Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 3(4): 409–416.Google Scholar
  25. Krno I., Šporka F., Štefková E., Tirjaková E., Bitušík P., Bulánková E., Lukáš J., Illéšová D., Derka T., Tomajka J & Černý J. 2006. Ecological study of a high=mountain stream ecosystem (Hincov potok, High Tatra Mountains, Slovakia). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 69(3): 299–316.Google Scholar
  26. Krno I., Šporka F., Tirjaková E. & Bulánková E. 1995. Influence of the construction of the Turček reservoir on the organisms of the river bottom. Folia Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Masaryk. Brun., Biol. 91: 53–62.Google Scholar
  27. Kruitbos L.M., Tetzlaff D., Soulsby C., Buttle J., Carey S.K., Laudon H., McDonnell J.J., McGuire K., Seibert J., Cunjak R. & Shanley J. 2012. Hydroclimatic and hydromechanical controls on Plecoptera diversity and distribution in northern freshwater ecosytem. Hydrobiologia 693: 39–53. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1085-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lillehammer A., Brittain J.E., Saltveit S.J. & Nielsen P.S. 1989. Egg development, nymphal growth and life cycle strategies and life cycle strategies in Plecoptera. Holarct. Ecol. 12(2): 173–186.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy M.L. & Hall J.D. 1981. Varied effects of clear-cut logging on predators and their habitat in small streams of the Cascade Mountains, Oregon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parmesan C. 2007. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Glob. Change Biol. 13(9): 1–13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinn J.M., Cooper A.B., Davies-Colley R.J., Rutherford J.C. & Williamson R.B. 1997. Land use effect on habitat, water quality, periphyton, and benthic invertebrates in Waikato, New Zealand hill country streams. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 31(5): 579–597. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1997.9516791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinn J.M. & Hickey C.W. 1990. Characterization and classification of benthic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 24(3): 387–409. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.41990.9516432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richter O., Suhling F., Müller O. & Kern D. 2008. A model for predicting the emergence of dragonflies in a changing climate. Freshwater Biol. 53(9): 1868–1880. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02012.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. StatSoft Inc. 2007. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. Google Scholar
  35. Stott T. & Marks S. 2000. Effects of plantation forestry clear felling on stream temperatures in the Plynlimon experimental catchments, mid-Wales. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 4(1): 95–104. DOI: 10.5194/hess-4-95-2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sweeney B.W. 1984. Factors influencing life history patterns of aquatic insects, pp. 56–100. In: Resh V.H. & Rosberg D. (eds), Ecology of aquatic insects, Praeger Scientific, New York, USA, 625 pp. ISBN: 003059684X, 9780030596841Google Scholar
  37. Sweeney B.W. & Vannote R.L. 1986. Growth and production of a stream stonefly: influence of diet and temperature. Ecology 67(5): 1396–1410. DOI: 10.2307/1938695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tierno de Figueroa J.M., Lopez-Rodriguez M.J., Lorenz A., Graf W., Schmidt-Kloiber A. & Hering D. 2010. Vulnerable taxa of European Plecoptera (Insecta) in the context of climate change. Biodivers. Conserv. 19(5): 1269–1277. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9753-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weatherley N.S. & Ormerod S.J. 1990. Forests and the temperature of upland streams in Wales: a modelling exploration of the biological effects. Freshwater Biol. 24(1): 109–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1990.tb00312.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams D.D., Willams N.E. & Hogg I.D. 1995. Life history plasticity of Nemoura trispinosa (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) along a permanent temporary water habitat gradient. Freshwater Biol. 34(1): 155–163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00432.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zwick P. 2004. Key to the West Palaearctic genera of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in the larval stage. Limnologica — Ecol. Manage. Inland Waters 34(4): 315–348. DOI: 10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80004-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iľja Krno
    • 1
  • Ferdinand Šporka
    • 2
  • Elena Štefková
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations