Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The importance of disturbance for the conservation of a low-competitive herb in mesotrophic grasslands

  • Section Botany
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the protection or re-establishment of species-rich grasslands, the limiting factors controlling species richness have increasingly become of scientific interest. This study aims to analyze the role of disturbance for the occurrence of a low-competitive herb, Centaurium erythraea Rafn, in mesotrophic, lowland grasslands in NW Germany. We sampled a total of 38 plots with presence of C. erythraea and 24 control (random) plots in semi-natural grasslands. As a proxy for disturbance, we estimated the cover of bare ground and Ellenberg flooding indicator species and measured the distance between the plot and the nearest path. Moreover, we counted the number of C. erythraea individuals within each plot. In the GLM analyses the distance from path was the only predictor; both the presence of the species and the number of individuals decreased with the distance from path. The grasslands at the path edges had the highest disturbance intensity. Here horse riding, military-vehicle traffic and regular sod-cutting directly create bare ground. In general, disturbance creating bare ground seems to be the key factor enabling germination and growth of C. erythraea in mesotrophic grasslands and other low-competitive short-lived species. Disturbance enhances the expression of the seed bank, favours the development of the shade-avoiding and low-growing rosettes and oppresses tall-growing competitors. Therefore we suggest grazing as the best management method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker J.P. 1989. Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 400 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbink R., Hornung M. & Roelofs J.G. 1998. The effect of airborne nitrogen pollutant on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J. Ecol. 86: 717–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown A.H.F. & Oosterhuis L. 1981. The role of buried seeds in coppice woods. Biol. Conserv. 21: 329–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock J.M., Clear H.B., Dale M.P. & Silvertown J. 1994. An experimental study of the effects of sheep grazing on vegetation change in a species-poor grassland and the role of seedling recruitment into gaps. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 493–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock J.M., Franklin J., Stevenson M.J., Silvertown J., Coulson S.J., Gregory S.J. & Tofts R. 2001. A plant trait analysis of responses to grazing in a long-term experiment. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F.S., Zavaleta E.S., Eviner V.T., Naylor R.L., Vitousek P.M., Reynolds H.L., Hooper D.U., Lavorel S., Sala O.E., Hobbie S.E., Mack M.C. & Díaz S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chytry M., Hejcman M., Hennekens S. & Schellberg J. 2009. Changes in vegetation types and Ellenberg indicator values after 65 years of fertilizer application in the Rengen Grassland Experiment, Germany. Appl. Veg. Sci. 12: 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley C.N.R., Burke M.J.W. & Stevens D.P. 2003. Conservation of lowland semi-natural grasslands in the UK: a review of botanical monitoring results from agri-environment schemes. Biol. Conserv. 115: 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins S.A.O. & Eriksson O. 2008. After the hotspots are gone. Land use history and grassland plant species diversity in a strongly transformed agricultural landscape. Appl. Veg. Sci. 11: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins S. 2009. Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 142: 2752–2758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies A. & Waite S. 1998. The persistence of calcareous grassland species in the soil seed bank under developing and established scrub. Plant Ecol. 136: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies A., Dunnett N.P. & Kendle, T. 1999. The importance of transplant size and gap width in the botanical enrichment of species-poor grasslands in Britain. Restor. Ecol. 7(3): 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierschke H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 683 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düll R. & Kutzelnigg H. 2005. Taschenlexikon der Pflanzen Deutschlands. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim, 577 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutoit T. & Alard D. 1995. Permanent seed banks in chalk grassland under various management regimes: their role in the restoration of species-rich plant communities. Biodivers. Conserv. 4: 939–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V. & Werner W. 2001. Zeigerwerte der Pflanzen von Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot. 18: 1–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O., Cousins S.A.O. & Bruun H.H. 2002. Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 743–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer K., Streitberger M. & Fartmann, T. 2010. Zur Ökologie der Wiesen-Glockenblume (Campanula patula) und des Echten Tausendgüldenkrauts (Centaurium erythraea) im Magergrünland Nordwestdeutschlands. Tuexenia 30: 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garve E. 2004. Rote Liste und Florenliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen in Niedersachsen und Bremen. 5. Fass. Inform.d. Naturschutz Niedersachs. 24: 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P, Hodgson J.G. & Hunt R. 2007. Comparative plant ecology. 2 edn. Castlepoint Press, Dalbeattie, 748 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström K., Huhta A.-P., Rautio P. & Tuomi J. 2009. Seed introduction and gap creation facilitate restoration of meadow species richness. J. Nat. Conserv. 17: 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzel N. 2005. Seedling recruitment in flood-meadow species: The effects of gaps, litter and vegetation matrix. Appl.Veg. Sci. 8: 115–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LANUV — Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz (ed.) 2012. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Pflanzen, Pilze und Tiere in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Fachbericht 36. Band 1: Pflanzen und Pilze, 536 pp.

  • Isselstein J., Tallowin J.R.B. & Smith R.E.N. 2002. Factors affecting seed germination and seedling establishment of fenmeadow species. Restor. Ecol. 10: 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S., McIntyre S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes T.D.A. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 474–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S., Lavorel S. & Tremont R. 1995. Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. J. Ecol. 83: l–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mierwald U. & Romahn K. 2006. Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Schleswig-Holsteins. Rote Liste Band 1. Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, Flintbek, 122 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münzbergová M. & Herben T. 2005. Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitation. Oecologia 145: 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiné R., Chocarro C. & Fillat F. 2006. Spatial patterns in seed bank and vegetation of semi-natural mountain meadows. Plant Ecol. 186: 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristow M., Herrmann A., Illig H., Klemm G., Kummer V., Kläge H.-C., Machatzi B., Rätzel S., Schwarz R. & Zimmermann F. 2006. Liste und Rote Liste der etablierten Gefäßpflanzen Brandenburgs. Nat.schutz Landsch.pfl. Brandenburg 15(4), suppl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbauer A. 1996. Gentianaceae — Enziangewächse, pp. 16–42. In: Sebald O., Seybold S., Philippi G. & Wörz A. (eds), Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Baden-Württembergs. Band 5: Spezieller Teil (Spermatophyta, Unterklasse Asteridae) Buddlejaceae bis Caprofoliaeceae. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal G. 2010. Secondary succession in a fallow central European wet grassland. Flora 205: 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala O.E., Chapin F.S., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig B., Leemans R., Lodge D.M., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., LeRoy P.N., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M. & Wall D.H. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standortverwaltung Münster 2005. Schafweideplan. Stand: 19.07. 2005. Unpublished manuscript, Münster. Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1997. Community invasability, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble S.W. & Mendel A.C. 1995. The cow as a geomorphic agent — a critical review. Geomorphol.13: 233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubsdell R.A.E. 1979. Studies on variation and evolution in Centaurium erythraea Rafn. and C. littorale (D. Turner) Gilmour in the British Isles. 3. Breeding systems, floral biology and general discussion. Watsonia 12: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk G. 1991. The status of semi-natural grasslands in Europe, pp. 15–36. In: Goriup P.D., Batten L.A. & Norton J.A. (eds), The conservation of lowland dry grassland birds in Europe. JNCC, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum F. 2009a. Succession stage variation in population size in an early-successional herb in a peri-urban forest. Acta Oecol. 35: 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum F. 2009b. Pollen dispersal and genetic variation in an early-succesisonal forest herb in a peri-urban forest. Plant Biology 11: 725–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Uytvanck J., Milotic T. & Hoffmann M. 2010. Interaction between large herbivore activities, vegetation structure, and flooding affects tree seedling emergence. Plant Ecol. 206: 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen P., Jefferson R., de Smidt J. & Straaten J. (eds.) 2009. Grasslands in Europe of high nature value. KNNV Publishing, Zeist, 320 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigtländer U. & Henker H. 2005. Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns. Herausgegeben vom Umweltministerium Schwerin. 5. Fassung, Stand November 2005. Umweltministerium, Schwerin, 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker K.J., Preston C.D. & Boon C.R. 2009. Fifty years of change in an area of intensive agriculture: plant trait responses to habitat modification and conservation, Bedfordshire, England. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 3597–3613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmanns O. 1998. Ökologische Pflanzensoziologie. 6 edn. Quelle & Meyer, Wiesbaden, 479 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M., Otsus M., Liira J., Moora M. & Möls T. 2000. Is smallscale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology 81: 3274–3282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Fartmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleischer, K., Streitberger, M. & Fartmann, T. The importance of disturbance for the conservation of a low-competitive herb in mesotrophic grasslands. Biologia 68, 398–403 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0164-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0164-8

Key words

Navigation