Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Similarities between predator mite populations (Acari: Gamasina) from natural forests in the Bucegi Massif, Romania

  • Section Zoology
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological research of gamasid mites was carried out in three natural forest ecosystems with Picea abies (1350 m a.s.l.), Abies alba (950–1000 m a.s.l.) and Fagus sylvatica (1200 m a.s.l.) situated in the Bucegi Massif, Southern Carpathians, Romania during 2001–2003. In the studied forest ecosystems, the taxonomic structure of gamasids was represented by 11 families (Epicriidae, Parasitidae, Veigaiidae, Ameroseiidae, Aceosejidae, Rhodacaridae, Macrochelidae, Pachylaelapidae, Laelapidae, Eviphididae and Zerconidae), with 39 genera and 97 species. The maximum number of species was recorded in the ecosystem with Abies alba (80), followed by the ecosystem with Fagus sylvatica (73), while the minimum in the ecosystem with Picea abies (68). 2,016 samples, 97 species with 23,441 individuals were analysed. In order to show similarities between predator mite populations from these areas, the vegetation and some abiotic parameters of the soil (temperature, humidity, pH) were analysed and described. Similarities between gamasid mite populations from the investigated ecosystems were analysed using the Jaccard index (q). The highest similarity index (q = 0.706) was recorded between gamasids identified in Picea abies and Abies alba forests, at soil level, in comparison with those from Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica forests (q = 0.656). Based on the similarity index, it is discussed that the gamasid population structure was influenced by the type of soil, the specific composition of the herbaceous, shrub and tree layers, the microclimatic factors, all characteristic for each studied ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balogh J. 1972. The oribatid genera of the world. Budapest, Akademiai Kiadó, 188 pp. ISBN: 0569071070, 978-0569071079

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedano J. & Ruf A. 2007. Soil predatory mite communities (Acari: Gamasina) in agroecosystems of Central Argentina. Appl. Soil Ecol. 36(1): 22–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedano J. & Ruf A. 2010. Sensitivity of different taxonomic levels of soil Gamasina to land use and anthropogenic disturbances. Agricult. Forest Entomol. 12(2): 203–212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00470.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlea F.G. 1998. Issues and Opportunities in the Evolution of Private Forestry and Forestry Extension in Several Countries with Economies in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7170E/w7170E00.htm (accessed 15.06.1998).

  • Botnariuc N. 2003. Evoluşia sistemelor biologice supraindividuale. Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti, 237 pp. ISBN: 973-575-365-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiriţă C. 1974. Ecopedologie cu baze de pedologie generală. Editura Ceres, Bucureşti, 591 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doniţă C., Popescu A., Paucă Comănescu M., Mihăilescu S. & Biriş I. 2005. Habitatele din România. Editura Tehnică Silvic ă, Bucureşti, 496 pp. ISBN: 973-96001-4-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu A. 1981. Fauna de Gamasidae (Acarieni) din unele soluri din Munşi Bihor. Crisia 15: 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiliarov M.S. & Bregetova N.G. 1977. Opredeliteli obitayushchikh v pochve kleshcheĭ Mesostigmata. Akademia Nauk USSR, Zoologicheskiĭ Institut Evolyucionoĭ Morfologii i Ekologii zhivotnikh im A.H. Savertova, Izd. Nauka, Leningrad, 701 pp. No. 21008-526/055 (02) - 77 512-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulvik M. 2007. Mites (Acari) as indicators of soil biodiversity and land use monitoring: a review. Polish J. Ecol. 55(3): 415–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwiazdowicz D. 2007. Ascid mites (Acari, Gamasina) from selected forest ecosystems and microhabitats in Poland. Wydawnictwo akademii rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu. Poznan, 248 pp.

  • Huang P.M., Wang M.K. & Chiu C.Y. 2005. Soil mineral-organic matter-microbe interactions: Impacts on biogeochemical processes and biodiversity in soils. Pedobiologia 49: 609–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamczyc J. & Gwiazdowicz D. 2009. Soil mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) from Szczeliniec Wielki in the Stołowe Mountains National Park (SW Poland). Biological Letters 46(1): 21–27. DOI: 10.2478/v10120-009-0010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karg W. 1993. Acari (Acarina), Milben Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta) Cohors Gamasina Leach — Raubmilben (German Edition) 59: 1–523. ISBN: 3334604454, 978-3334604458

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler H.H. 1997. Mesostigmata (Gamasina, Uropodina) efficient predators in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 62: 105–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0167-8809(96)01141-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler H.H. 1999. Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74(1–3): 395–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00045-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman A.M., Mourik J.M. & Schilder M.L.M. 2009. The relationship between N mineralization or microbial biomass N with micromorphological properties in beech forest soils with different texture and pH. Biol. Fertility Soils 45(5): 449–459. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-009-0354-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makulec I.K., Olejniczak I. & Szanser M. 2006. Response of soil micro- and mesofauna to diversity and quality of plant litter. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 42(1): S244–S249. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mašán P. 2003. Macrochelid mites of Slovakia (Acari, Mesostigmata, Macrochelidae). Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, 149 pp. ISBN: 80-969054-0-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Mašán P. 2007. A review of the family Pachylaelapidae in Slovakia with systematics and ecology of European species (Acari: Mesostigmata: Eviphidoidea). Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, 247 pp. ISBN: 978-80-969743-0-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Mašán P. & Fend’a P. 2004. Zerconid mites of Slovakia (Acari, Mesostigmata, Zerconidae), Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, 238 pp. ISBN: 80-969239-6-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Mašán P. & Halliday B. 2010. Review of the European genera of Eviphididae (Acari: Mesostigmata) and the species occurring in Slovakia. Zootaxa 2585: 1–122. ISBN 978-1-86977-565-0

    Google Scholar 

  • McAleece N., Lambshead P.J.D. & Paterson G.L.J. 1997. BioDiversity Pro: Free Statistics Software for Ecology. The Natural History Museum, London. http://gcmd.nasa.gov/records/NHML_Biopro.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz L.J. 1971. Vertical movement of the Acarina under moisture gradients. Pedobiologia 11(3): 262–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi V., Menta C., Gardi C., Jacomini C. & Mozzanica E. 2005. Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: a new approach in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105(1–2): 323–333. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf A. 1997. Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Raubmilben und Charakterisierung von Boden — Ein Konzept zur Indikation von Belastungszustanden von Boden. Abh. Ber. Naturkundemus. Görlitz 69(2): 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruf A. 2000. Predatory mites as indicators for soil quality — what is indicated by mites and not by earthworms? Abh. Ber. Naturkundemus. Görlitz 72(1): 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmane I. 2000. Investigation of the seasonal dynamics of soil Gamasina mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Pinaceum myrtilosum Latvia. Ekológia (Bratislava) 19(Suppl. 3): 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmane I. 2003. Investigations of Gamasina mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in natural and man-affected soils in Latvia, pp. 129–137. In: Reemer M., Helsdingen P.J. van & Kleukers R.M.J.C. (eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium of the European Invertebrate Survey, September 2–5, 2001, published by European Invertebrate Survey — the Netherlands, Leiden. http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/46388

  • Salmane I. & Brumelis G. 2008. The importance of the moss layer in sustaining biological diversity of Gamasina mites in coniferous forest soil. Pedobiologia 52(1): 69–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2008.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmane I. & Brumelis G. 2010. Species list and habitat preference of mesostigmata mites (Acari, Parasitiformes) in Latvia. Acarologia 50(3): 373–394. DOI: 10.1051/acarologia/20101978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorupski M., Belter W., Kamczyc J. & Wierzbicka, A. 2008. Soil mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) of the ‘Torfowiska Doliny Izery’ Reserve in the Sudety Mountains. Soil Organisms 80(2): 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorupski M., Butkiewicz G. & Wierzbicka A. 2009. The first reaction of soil mite fauna (Acari, Mesostigmata) caused by conversion of Norway spruce stand in the Szklarska Poręba Forest District. J. Forest Sci. 55(5): 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon L. 1982. First investigation on the Mesostigmatic mites in the Călimani Mountains. Analele Štiinţifice ale Universit ătăţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iaşi 28: 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stănescu M. & Gwiazdowicz D.J. 2004. Preliminary research on Mesostigmata mites (Acari) from a spruce forest in the Bucegi massif in Romania. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria 3(2): 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stănescu M. & Honciuc V. 2006. The taxonomical structure of the Epicriina and Gamasina mites (Mesostigmata: Epicriina, Gamasina) from forestry ecosystems from Bucegi Massif. Romanian Journal of Zoology 51(1–2): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Taxonomy and Nature Conservation Department, Institute of Biology — Romanian Academy, Ecology, Splaiul Independenşei, No. 296, 060031, Bucharest, Romania

    Manu Minodora

Authors
  1. Manu Minodora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manu Minodora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minodora, M. Similarities between predator mite populations (Acari: Gamasina) from natural forests in the Bucegi Massif, Romania. Biologia 67, 390–396 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0019-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0019-8

Key words

Search

Navigation