Skip to main content
Log in

Which stem parts of Slender speedwell (Veronica filiformis) are the most successful in plant regeneration?

  • Section Botany
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regeneration of Slender speedwell (Veronica filiformis) from small parts of stem without using stimulative agents was the focus of the investigation. Four different short fragments of shoot (main terminal, secondary terminal, nodal segment and internodal segment) were cultivated under greenhouse and natural conditions. All tested vegetative segments induced roots, rooted in a soil substrate and in a semi-natural lawn, survived winter, and flowered. Multiplication of clonal plants was confirmed for both the main and secondary terminal segments. These terminal segments had the best response in number of growing individuals, flowering stems, and weight of dried biomass. The manipulative experiment revealed that clonal success of speedwell is connected with possibilities to hive off of all tested above-ground segments. Establishment of plantlets from the segment in natural condition was not successful when accompanied by certain grass species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albach D.C., Martínes-Ortega M.M., Fischer M.A. & Chase M.W. 2004. Evolution of Veroniceae: A phylogenetic perspective. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 91: 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford D.V. & Backhaus G.F. (eds) 2005. Plant protection and plant health in Europe: Introduction and spread of invasive species. Page Bros, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L. et al. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Summary for policymakers. IPCC Plenary XXVII, November 12–17, 2007, Valencia, 1–22.

  • Harris G.R. & Lovell P.H. 1980. Adventious root formation in Veronica Spp. Ann. Bot. 45: 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm L., Pancho J.V., Herberger J.P. & Plucknett D.C. 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehlík V. 1961. Rozšření Veronica filiformis Smith v Československu a poznámky k jejímu vyskytu. Preslia 33: 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehlík V. (ed.) 1998. Cizí expanzivní plevele Česk Slovenské republiky. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimesova J. & de Bello F. 2009. CLO-PLA: the database of clonal and bud bank traits of Central European flora. J. Veg. Sci. 20: 511–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapin M., Gera M., Hrvoľ J., Melo M. & Tomlain J. 2009. Possible impact of climate change on hydrologic cycle in Slovakia and results of observations in 1951–2007. Biologia 64: 454–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeflang L. 1999. Are stoloniferous plants able to avoid neighbours in response to low R: FR ratios in reflected light? pp. 59–65. In: 5th Clonal Plant Workshop on Clonal Plants and Environmental Heterogeneity — Space, Time and Scale, Univ Wales, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloun M. & Militky J. 1994. Methods in the biological and health sciences. Mc Graw Hill, Hightstown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloun M., Militky J. & Hill M. 2005. Počítačová analýza vícerozměrnych dat. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller N. & Sukopp H. 1993. Synanthrope Ausbreitung und Vergesellschaftung des Fadenförmigen Ehrenpreises-Veronica filiformis Smith. Tuexenia 13: 399–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal J.C. & Senesac A.F. 1993. Slender speedwell (Veronica filiformis) control in cool-season turf with Quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7: 390–395.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peniašteková M. & Zlinská J. 1995. Veronica filiformis Sm. in Slovakia — notes on distribution, ecology and phytocoenology. Biologia 50: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semchenko M., Zobel K. & Hutchings M.J. 2010. To compete or not to compete: an experimental study of interactions between plant species with contrasting root behaviour. Evolut. Ecol. 24: 1433–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soják J. & Šourek J. 1959. Veronica filiformis Sm. v Československu. Preslia 31: 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach K. & Gottsberger G. 1994. Phenology and pollination biology of 5 Ranunculus species in Giessen, central Germany. Phyton Annales rei Botanicae 34: 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler I. 1953. Die Ausbreitung von Veronica filiformis Smith. Phyton 5: 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen P.J., Stuefer J.F., During H.J. & Anten N.P.R. 2008 Leaf investment and light partitioning among leaves of different genotypes of the clonal plant Potentilla reptans in a dense stand after 5 years of competition. Ann. Bot. 102: 935–943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E. & Gut D. 2004. Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe. J. Nat. Conserv. 12: 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Božena Šerá.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Šerá, B. Which stem parts of Slender speedwell (Veronica filiformis) are the most successful in plant regeneration?. Biologia 67, 110–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0143-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0143-x

Key words

Navigation