Abstract
The pollen of six taxa of the genus Rubus endemic to Poland (R. capitulatus, R. chaerophylloides, R. ostroviensis, R. posnaniensis, R. seebergensis and R. spribillei)was studied using light and scanning electron microscopy. The study objective was to extend the knowledge of the species pollen morphology and to investigate whether pollen morphology may help to taxonomically distinguish a very rare bramble species. Study material was derived from six natural localities where the species occur in the Wielkopolska region (Poland). Ten quantitative pollen grain features were analysed as well as the following qualitative ones: outline, shape, type of bridge and exine sculpture. Only mature, correctly formed pollen grains (30 per specimen) were measured and 180 pollen grains were examined in total. It was found that R. capitulatus and R. seebergensis had the highest mean values of P, E and Le features. In addition, pollen grains of R. capitulatus were most flattened (mean P/E ratio equals 1.14), while those of R. seebergensis were most elongated (mean P/E ratio equals 1.27). R. spribillei was the only species with striae of similar width as muri, whereas striae in the remaining species were wider. R. chaerophylloides and R. posnaniensis were characterised by specific, similar exine sculpture. Nevertheless, it should be stated that differences between pollen features of the species studied are so small and the variability of these features are so large that it is difficult to clearly identify the species studied. Therefore, pollen grain morphology can serve only as an auxiliary feature for the determination of these species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boratyńska K. & Lewandowska D. 2009. Differences among three populations of Pinus uliginosa and their relation to P. sylvestris as expressed by the needle characters. Dendrobiology 61: 37–46.
Eide F. 1981a. Key for Northwest European Rosaceae pollen. Grana 20: 101–118.
Eide F. 1981b. On the pollen morphology of Rubus chamaemorus L. (Rosaceae). Grana 20: 25–27.
Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Angiosperms. An Introduction to Palynology 1. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 539 pp.
Erdtman G., Berglund B. & Praglowski J. 1961. An Introduction to a Scandinavian Pollen Flora. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 91 pp.
Faegri K. & Iversen J. 1989. Textbook of Pollen Analysis. 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons. Chichester, 328 pp.
Fedoronchuk M.M. & Savitsky V.D. 1987. Comparative and morphological analysis of pollen for genera of the family Rosaceae Juss. of the Ukrainian flora. Ukr. Bot. Zhurn. 44(2): 32–38.
Gonzalez Romano M.L. & Candau P.A. 1989. Contribution to palynological studies in the Rosaceae. Acta Bot. Malac. 14: 105–116.
Hebda R.J. & Chinnappa C.C. 1990. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae in Canada. Rev. Palaeob. Palynol. 64: 103–108.
Hebda R.J. & Chinnappa C.C. 1994. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae. Acta Bot. Gall. 141: 183–193.
Hesse M., Halbritter H., Zetter R., Weber M., Buchner R., Frosch-Radivo A. & Ulrich S. 2009. Pollen Terminology. An illustrated handbook. Springer, Vienna, 264 pp.
Kosenko V.N., Nguen T.H. & Jacovlev G.P. 1982. Palynomorphological study of the representatives of the genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in the flora of Vietnam. Bot. Zhurn. 69(4): 497–503.
Kuprianova L.A. & Alyoshina L.A. 1978. Pollen dicotyledoneaerum Florae Partis Europareae. URSS. Lamiaceae-Zygophyllaceae. Nauka, Akad. Sci. USSR, L. Komarov. Inst. Bot., 184 pp.
Li W.L., He S.A., Gu Y., Shu P. & Pu Z.M. 2001. Pollen morphology of the genus Rubus from China. Acta Phyto. Sin. 39(3): 234–247.
Maliński T. 2001. Rodzaj Rubus L. w południowej Wielkopolsce. Rocz. Dendrol. 49: 13–95.
Mazur M., Klajbor K., Kielich M., Sowińska M., Romo A., Montserrat J.M. & Boratyński A. 2010. Intra-specific differentiation of Juniperus phoenicea in the western Mediterranean region revealed in morphological multivariate analysis. Dendrobiology 63: 21–31.
Monasterio-Huelin E. & Pardo C. 1995. Pollen morphology and wall stratification in Rubus L. (Rosaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Grana 34: 229–236.
Moore P.D., Webb J.A. & Collinson M.E. 1991. Pollen analysis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, 216 pp.
Naruhashi N. & Takano H. 1980. Size variation of pollen grains in some Rubus species. J. Phytogeogr. Taxon. 28(1): 27–32.
Punt W., Hoen P.P., Blackmore S., Nilsson S. & Le Thomas A. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 143(1–2): 1–81.
Reitsma T.J. 1966. Pollen morphology of some European Rosaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 290–379.
Reitsma T.J. 1969. Size modification on recent pollen grains under different treatments. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 9: 175–202.
Sobierajska K., Boratyńska K. & Marcysiak K. 2010. Variation of cone characters in Pinus mugo (Pinaceae) populations in the Giant Mountains (Karkonosze, Sudetes). Dendrobiology 63: 33–41.
Stace C.A. 1989. Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics. 2nd ed. Edward Arnold, London, 288 pp.
Teppner H. 1965. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Waldsteinia L. Phyton 3(4): 224–238.
Tomlik-Wyremblewska A. 1995. Pollen morphology of genus Rubus L. Part I. Introductory studies of the European representatives of the subgenus Rubus L. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 64(2): 187–203.
Tomlik-Wyremblewska A. 2000. Pollen morphology of genus Rubus L. Part II. Introductory studies on the Malesian species of subgenus Micranthobatus Fritsch. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 69(1): 31–40.
Tomlik-Wyremblewska A., van der Ham R.W.J.M. & Kosiński P. 2004. Pollen morphology of genus Rubus L. Part III. Studies on the Malesian species of subgenera Chamaebatus L. and Idaeobatus L. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 73(3): 207–227.
Ueda Y. & Tomita H. 1989. Morphometric analysis of pollen patterns in Roses. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58(1): 211–220.
Ueda Y. 1992. Pollen surface morphology in the genus Rosa, related genera. Jap. J. Palynol. 38(2): 94–105.
Wang X.R., Tang H.R., Huang L.H., Zong Z.D., Xiao L.F., Hua Q.D. & Qun X. 2007. Comparative studies on pollen submicroscopic morphology of some wild species and cultivars of bramble (Rubus L.). Acta Hort. Sin. 34(6): 1395–1404.
Weber H.E. 1995. Rubus L., pp. 284–595. In: Conert H.J. et al. (eds), Gustav Hegi Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. 4(2A), Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin.
Wrońska-Pilarek D. & Jagodziński A.M. 2009. Pollen morphological variability of Polish native species of Rosa L. (Rosaceae). Dendrobiology 62: 71–82.
Wrońska-Pilarek D. 1998. Pollen morphology of the Polish species of the genus Ribes L. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 67(3–4): 275–285.
Wrońska-Pilarek D., Maliński T. & Lira J. 2006. Pollen morphology of Polish species of genus Rubus L. — Rubus gracilis J. Presl & C. Presl. Dendrobiology 56: 69–77.
Zhou L.H., Wie Z.X. & Wu Z.Y. 1999. Pollen morphology of Rosoideae(Rosaceae) of China. Acta Bot. Yunnan. 21(4): 455–460.
Zieliński J. 2001. Rubus L., pp. 458–480. In: Zając A. & Zając M. (eds), Distribution Atlas of vascular plants in Poland. Edited by Laboratory of Computer Chorology. Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kraków.
Zieliński J. 2004. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in Poland. Pol. Bot. Stud., Kraków, 300 pp.
Żukowski W. & Jackowiak B. (eds) 1995. Ginące i zagrożone rośliny naczyniowe Pomorza Zachodniego i Wielkopolski Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin UAM 3. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Poznań, 141 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wrońska-Pilarek, D., Jagodziński, A.M. & Maliński, T. Morphological studies of pollen grains of the Polish endemic species of the genus Rubus (Rosaceae). Biologia 67, 87–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0141-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0141-z