Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Histomorphology of preorbital gland in territorial and non-territorial male blackbuck Antelope cervicapra, a critically endangered species

  • Section Zoology
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The preorbital gland is a specialized dermal gland of antelopes which plays an important role in territorial marking behavior and pheromonal communication. To our knowledge, there is little information available on the role of preorbital gland marks in Indian antelopes (blackbucks). Males are seen averting the gland during behavioural display and territorial marking but the functional aspect of this gland has not been examined. Hence, the aim of this study was to describe the histomorphology of the preorbital gland in territorial and non-territorial male blackbucks to determine its morphology and secretory function. The results showed that the preorbital gland is composed of modified sebaceous and apocrine glands. The apocrine gland is lined by simple cuboidal epithelial cells; the serous parts of the secretory products are often seen in the apical portions of the cells. The myoepithelial cells contain actin filaments lying on the basal membranes of the apocrine gland. There are some considerable histological changes in the presence of the sebaceous and apocrine glands in territorial males in comparison to non-territorial males. The following histological changes associated with occurrence of the sebaceous and apocrine glands have been observed in territorial and non-territorial male blackbucks: (1) increase of size of sebaceous and apocrine glands and (2) increase in density of sebaceous and apocrine glands in territorial males compared to non-territorial males. It is suggested that the higher development (i.e., size) and density of sebaceous and apocrine glands in territorial males could depend on hormone production (i.e., testosterone). Based on the histological observation and the role of sebaceous and apocrine glands in the preorbital gland supported by literature, it is possible to conclude that both territorial and non-territorial blackbuck males may produce pheromonal substances through preorbital gland (secretion) for olfactory communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agungpriyono S., Atoji Y., Yamamoto Y., Zuki A.B. & Novelino S. 2006. Morphology of the intermandibular gland of the lesser mouse deer, Tragulus javanicus. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 35: 325–333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439/0264.2004.00691x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arcese P. 1999. Effect of auxiliary males on territory ownership in the oribi and the attributes of multimale groups. Anim. Behav. 57: 61–71. DOI:10.1006/anbe.1998.0962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atoji Y., Sugimura M. & Suzuki Y. 1989. Sebaceous glands of the infraorbital gland of the Japanese serow, Capricornis crispus swinhoei. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 21: 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atoji Y. & Suzuki Y. 1990. Apocrine gland of the infraorbital gland of the Japanese serow. Acta Morphol. Neerl. Scan. 25: 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atoji Y., Yamamoto Y. & Suzuki T. 1993. Apocrine secretion in the infraorbital gland of the Japanese serow, Capricornis crispus: a scanning electron-microscopic study. Acta Anat. 148: 8–13. DOI: 10.1159/000146516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atoji Y., Yamamoto Y. & Suzuki Y. 1996. Infraorbital glands of a male Formosan serow (Capricornis crispus swinhoei). Eur. J. Morphol. 34: 87–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan M. & Alexander K.M. 1985. Sources of body odours in some Indian mammals. Indian Rev. Life Sci. 71: 257–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks W.J. 1993. Applied Veterinary Histology, 3rd Ed. St. Louis Mosby Year Book, 527 pp.

  • Bartos L., Víchová J. & Lancingerová J. 2005. Pre-orbital gland opening in red deer (Cervus elaphus) calves. Signals of hunger? J. Anim. Sci. 83: 124–129.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoš L. 1983. Some observations on the relationship between preorbital gland opening and social interactions in red deer. Aggress. Behav. 9: 59–67. DOI:10.1002/1098/2337(1983)9:1 <59:AID-AB24800901o8>3.0.CO;2-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya T. & Chattopadhya B. 1984. A study on the structure of the social organization of Blackbuck, Antilope cervicapra Linne, in Ballavpur wildlife sanctuary, West Bengal, India. Lynx 22: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee C.K., Rice C.G. & Ralls K. 1979. Behaviour and reproductions of captive brown-antlered deer Cervus eldi thamin (Thomas, 1918). Säugetierk. Mitt. 27: 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer R.T., Van Ballenberghe V. & Rock K.R. 1994. Scent marking by Alaskan moose: characteristics and spatial distribution of rubbed trees. Can. J. Zool. 72: 2186–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger B.V., Yang T.P., Le Roux M., Brandt W.F., Cox A.J. & Hart P.F. 1997. Mammalian exocrine secretions. XI. Constituents of the preorbital secretion of klipspringer, Oreotragus oreotragus. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 2383–2400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butzler W. 1974. Kampf und Paarungsverhalten, sozial Rangordung and Aktivitatsperiodik beim Rothirsch. Beiheft Z. Tierpsychol. No. 16, Paul Parey Verlag, Hamburg, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspers B., Wibbelt G. & Voigt C.C. 2009. Histological examinations of facial glands in Saccopteryx bilineata (Chiroptera, Emballonuridae), and their potential use in territorial marking. Zoomorphology 128: 37–43. DOI: 10.1007/s00435-008-0072-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T.H., Guinness F.E. & Albon S.D. 1982. Red Deer, Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 378 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M. & Gerneke D.H. 1976. Preliminary report on the intermandibular cutaneous glandular area and the infraorbital gland of the steenbok. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 47: 35–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebling F.J. 1975. The effects of testosterone and oestradiol on the sebaceous glands and epidermis of the rat. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 5: 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo A.M., Pendini V. & Ceccarelli P. 1990. The process of secretion in swine apocrine sweat glands. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 19: 264–268. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1990.tb00888.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling L.M. 1982. A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z. Tierpsychol. 60: 89–118. DOI:10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80298-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling L.M. 1987. Scent marking in an antelope lek territory. Anim. Behav. 35: 620–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D.R., Flood P.F. & Rowell J.E. 1989. The structure and function of muskox preorbital glands. Can. J. Zool. 67: 1134–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haffner M. 1998. The size of sebaceous glands in relation to the size of the hair follicles on the heads of small mammals (Insectivora, Chiroptera, Rodentia). Ann. Anat. 180: 165–171.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J.B. & Montagna, W. 1950. The sebaceous glands of the hamster. Am. J. Anat. 86: 191–233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatlapa H.H. 1977. Zur biologischen Bedeutung des praorbital Organs beim Rotwild, Pragung, Individualgeruch, Orientierung. Berl. Munch. Tierartzl. Wochenschr. 90: 100–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk C.K., Wantia J. & Isler K. 2008. Female dominance over males in primates: Self-organisation and sexual dimorphism. Plos ONE 3: 2678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg J.T. & Forbes S.H. 1997. Mating in bighorn sheep: frequent male reproduction via a high-risk unconventional tactic. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 33–48. DOI: 10.1126/science.6539948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humason G.L. 1979. Animal Tissue Techniques. 4th Ed. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 661 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson D.M. 1967. On of the classification of sweat glands and the question of the existence of the apocrine secretory process. Br. Vet. J. 123: 311.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalina J. & Adams M.A. 1984. Intermandibular gland secretions of larger Malayan mouse deer. J. Mammal. 65: 715–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneeland J.E. 1966. Fine structure of the sweat glands of the antibrachial organ of Lemur catta. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 73: 521–533.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurosumi K. & Kawabata I. 1976. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy of the human ceruminous apocrine gland. I. Secretory glandular cells. Arch. Histol. Jpn. 39: 207–229.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurosumi K. & Kurosumi U. 1982. Further studies on the ultra structure of human axillary apocrine sweat glands. Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. 58: 305–324.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurosumi K., Shibasaki S. & Ito T. 1984. Cytology of the secretion in mammalian sweat glands. Int. Rev. Cytol. 87: 253–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lapiere C. 1953. Modifications des glandes sébacées par des hormones sexuelles appliquées localement sur la peau de souris. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 147: 1302–1306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson R.E., Putnam R.J. & Fielding A. 2001. Chemical communication in Eurasian deer (Cervidae): Do individual odours also code for attributes. J. Zool. (Lond.) 253: 91–99. DOI:10.1017/S0952836901000085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez P. & Martin P. 2005. Chemical compounds from femoral gland secretions of male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola cyreni. Z. Naturforsch. 60: 632–636.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mainoya J.R. 1978. Histological aspect of preorbital and interdigital glands of red duiker (Cephalopus natalensis). East. Afr. Wildl. J. 16: 256–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer W., Tsukise A., Neurand K. & Hirabayashi Y. 2001. Cytological and lectin histochemical characterization of secretion production and secretion composition in the tubular glands of the canine anal sacs. Cell Tiss. Org. 168: 203–219. DOI:10.1159/000047835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K.V., Jemiolo B., Cassett J.W., Jelinek I., Wiesler D. & Novotny M. 1998. Putative chemical signals from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): Social and seasonal effects on urinary volatile excretion in males. J. Chem. Ecol. 24: 673–683. DOI:10.1023/A:1022342219469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel O.G. 1965. Effect of castration and transplantation on ventral gland of the gerbil. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med. 119: 953–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungall EC. 1977. Social development of the young blackbuck antelope (Antelope cervicapra), pp. 100–109. In: AAZPA Regional Conf. Proc., American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquarium, Washington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Using D. & Schloeth R. 1967. Das Verhalten der Hirsche. Kukenthal Handb. Zool. 10: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassar J.M., Salazar M.V., Quintero A., Stoner K.E., Gomez M., Cabrera A. & Jaffe K. 2008. Seasonal sebaceous patch in the nector-feeding bats Leptonycteris curasoae and L. yerbabuenae (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae): phonological, histological, and preliminary chemical characterization. Zoology 111: 363–376. DOI:10.1016/j.zool.2007.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny M.V., Jemiolo B., & Harvey S. 1990. Chemistry of rodent pheromones: molecular insights into chemical signaling in mammals, pp. 1–22. In: MacDonald D.W., Muller-Schwarze D. & Natynczuk S.E. (eds), Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal T. & Archunan G. 2008. Scent marking by Indian Blackbuck: characteristics and spatial distribution of urine, pellet, preorbital and interdigital gland marking in captivity, pp. 71–80. In: Reddy M.V. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation, Chapter 8, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal T., Manimozhi A. & Archunan G. 2010. Diurnal variation in scent preorbital gland marking behaviour of captive male Indian Blackbuck (Antelope cervicapra L.) and its territorial significance. Biol. Rhythm Res. DOI:10.1080/09291011003693161

  • Ranjitsingh M.K. 1989. The Indian Blackbuck. Nadraj Publisher, Dehradun, 155 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich T.J. & Hurst J.L. 1999. The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential males. Anim. Behav. 58: 1027–1037. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richter J. 1971. Unterschungen an antorbitaldrusen vonMadaqua (Bovidae; Mammalia). Z. Säugetierkunde 36: 334–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S.C. 1998. Behavioural responses to scent marks of increasing age in klipsringer, Oreotragus oreotragus. Ethology 104: 555–564. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00093.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertshaw D. 1987. Biology of apocrine sweat glands, pp. 209–212. In: Fitzpatrick T.B., Eisen A.Z. & Ketal W. (eds), Dermatology in General Medicine, 3rd Ed., Mc Graw Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roden C., Vervaecke H. & van Elsacker L. 2005. Dominance, age and weight in American bison males (Bison bison) during non-rut in semi-natural conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 92: 169–177. DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter L.S. & Lou A.V. 1975. Morphometric evaluation of sebaceous gland volume in intact, castrated, and testosterone-treated rats. J. Invest. Dermatol. 64: 9–13. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12540869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal A. 1982. Influence de I’environment sur les composantes du groupe social chez le daim cervus (Dama dama L.). Rev. Eol. Terr. Vie. 36: 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer J. 1940. Die Hautdrusenorgan der Saugetiere. Verlag Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin und Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer A., Wilkens H., Vollmerhaus B. & Habermehl K.H. 1981. Skin and cutaneous ogans. Specialized structures of the skin, pp. 461–469. In: Nickel R., Schummer A. & Seiferle E. (eds), The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals, Vol. III., Verl. Paul Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully W.M.R., Fenton M.B. & Saleuddin A.S.M. 2000. A histological examination of the holding sacs and glandular scent organs of some bat species (Emballonuridae, Hipposideridae, Phyllostomidae, Vespertilionidae and Molossidae). Can. J. Zool. 78: 613–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J.D. & Hearn G.W. 1979. Ultra structure of the apocrine sebaceous anal scent gland of the woodchuck, Marmota monax evidence for apocrine and merocrine secretion by a single cell type. Anat. Rec. 193: 269–292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss J.S., Kligman A.M. & Pochi P.E. 1962. The effect of androgens and estrogens on human sebaceous glands. J. Invest. Dermatol. 39: 139–155. DOI:10.1038/jid.1962.22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker S., Van Den Broeck, W. & Simoens P. 2005. Morphology of caprine skin glands involved in buck odour production. Vet. J. 170: 351–358. DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfel H. 1983. Zur Jugendenwicklung, Mutter-Kind-Bindung und Feindvermeidung beim Rothirsch (Cervus elaphus) II. Z. Jagdwissensch. 29: 197–213. DOI: 10.1007/BF02243645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasui T., Tsukise A., Habata I., Nara T. & Meyer W. 2004. Histochemistry of complex carbohydrates in the ceruminous glands of the goat. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 296: 12–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Govindaraju Archunan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajagopal, T., Archunan, G. Histomorphology of preorbital gland in territorial and non-territorial male blackbuck Antelope cervicapra, a critically endangered species. Biologia 66, 370–378 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0015-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0015-4

Key words

Navigation