Biologia

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 55–63 | Cite as

Morphometric and molecular (RAPD) analysis of six Serapias taxa from Croatia

  • Vladimir Hršak
  • Slavko Brana
  • Zorana Sedlar
  • Ivan Pejić
Section Botany
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The morphometric analyses and genetic variability assessed by RAPD markers have been used to analyse relations among six Serapias taxa from Croatia (S. istriaca, S. pulae originally described as hybrid, S. ionica, S. vomeracea, S. lingua and S. cordigera). S. istriaca distributed in southern Istria and the island of Lošinj and S. pulae stenoendemic taxon distributed only in southern Istria S. ionica is endemic to the Ionian and Dalmatian islands, while the remaining taxa are more widely distributed. The obtained results shows that the endemic S. istriaca is a well characterised taxon, that S. pulae is a hybrid between S. istriaca and S. lingua and that the hybrid is morphologically and genetically more similar to S. lingua than the second parental species S. istriaca. The division into the subsections Steno-, Medio- and Platypetalae is founded based on the floral morphology while the division into the sections Serapias and Bilamellaria is not evident in the quantitative morphological and genetic analyses. Furthermore, considerable genetic resemblance between S. vomeracea and S. ionica was established.

Key words

discriminant analysis endemic orchids hybridization index molecular taxonomy Istria 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aceto S., Caputo P., Cozzolino S., Gaudio L. & Moretti A. 1999. Phylogeny and evolution of Orchis and allied genera based on its DNA variation: morphological gaps and molecular continuity. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 13: 67–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateman R.M., Hollingsworth P.M., Preston J., Yi-Bo L., Pridgeon A.M., & Chase M.W. 2000. Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae, pp. 224–232. In: Pridgeon A.M., Cribb P.J., Chase M.W. & Rasmussen F.N., (eds), Genera Orchidacearum, Vol. 2, Orchidoideae Part 1.Google Scholar
  3. Bateman R.M., Hollingsworth P.M., Preston J., Yi-Bo, L. Pridgeon A.M. & Chase M.W. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics and evolutuion of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 142: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumann H. & Künkele S. 1989. Die Gattung Serapias L. — eine taxonomische Übersicht. Mitt. Bl. Heim. Orch. Baden-Württemberg 20(3): 610–651.Google Scholar
  5. Baumann H., Künkele S. & Lorenz R. 2006. Orchideen Europas mit angrenzenden Gebieten. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart (Hohenheim).Google Scholar
  6. Bellusci F., Pellegrino G., Palermo A.M & Musacchio A. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships in the orchid genus Serapias L. based on noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 47: 986–991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buerkle C.A. 2005. Maximum-likelihood estimation of a hybrid index based on molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 684–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buttler K.P. 1986. Orchideen. Die wildwachsenden Arten und Unterarten Europas, Vorderasiens und Nordafrikas. Mosaik Verlag, München.Google Scholar
  9. Delforge P. 1995. Orchids of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. Harper Collins, London.Google Scholar
  10. Delforge P. 2006. Orchids of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. Timber Press, Portland.Google Scholar
  11. D’Emerico S., Galasso I. & Pignone D. 1997. Karyomorphological considerations on some taxa of the genus Serapias L. (Orchidaceae). Inform. Bot. Ital. 29: 311.Google Scholar
  12. D’Emerico S., Pignone D. & Scrugli A. 2000. Giemsa C-banded karyotypes in Serapias L. (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 485–492.Google Scholar
  13. Doyle J.L. & Doyle J.J. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12(1): 13–15.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrendorfer F. 1980. Hybridisierung, Polyploidie und Evolution bei europäisch-mediterranen Orchideen. Jahresber. Naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal 33: 15–34.Google Scholar
  15. Freyn J. 1877. Die Flora von Süd-Istrien. — Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 27: 241–490.Google Scholar
  16. Gölz P. & Reinhard H.R. 1980. Serapias (Orchidaceae) — Ergebnisse statistischer und chorologischer Untersuchungen. Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. Heim. Orch. Baden-Württemberg 12(3): 123–189.Google Scholar
  17. Gölz P. & Reinhard H.R. 1986. Orchideen in Jugoslawien. Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. Heim. Orch. Baden-Würrtemberg 18(4): 689–827.Google Scholar
  18. Gölz P. & Reinhard H.R. 1989. Die Gattung Serapias L. eine taxonomische Übersicht. Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. Heim. Orch. Baden-Würrtemberg Orch. Baden-Würrtemberg 21(3): 701–946.Google Scholar
  19. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and dana analysis. Paleaeont. Elec. 4/1: 1–9.Google Scholar
  20. Hršak V. 2000. Orchidaceae. In: Nikolić T. (ed.), Index Florae Croaticae. Natura Croatica, Suppl. 3: 163–173.Google Scholar
  21. Kranjčev R. 2005. Hrvatske orhideje. AKD Zagreb.Google Scholar
  22. Lorenz R. 2001. Die Gattung Serapias in Italien: Arten und Verbreitung. Jour. Eur. Orch. 33(1): 235–368.Google Scholar
  23. Martine P. & Gerbaud O. 1998. Considérations sur quelques Serapias varois. L’Orchidophile 130: 10–22.Google Scholar
  24. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Naturalist 106: 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson E. 1968. Monographie und Ikonographie der Orchideen-Gattungen Serapias, Aceras, Loroglossum, Barlia. G. & A. Claraz-Schenkung, Zürich.Google Scholar
  26. Pellegrino G., Musacchio A., Noce M.E., Palermo A.M. & Widmer A. 2005. Reproductive versus floral isolation among morphologically similar Serapias L. species (Orchidaceae). J. Hered. 96(1): 15–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Perko M.L. 1998. Ergänzungen zur Flora von Istrien (Kroatien/Hrvatska): Serapias istriaca M.L. Perko, spec. nov. und Serapias xpulae M.L. Perko, nothospec. nat. nov. (Orchidaceae). Ber. Arbeitskr. Heim. Orchid. 15(2): 13–27.Google Scholar
  28. Rohlf F.J. 2005. NTSYSpc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.2. Getting Starter Guide. Exeter Software, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Simpson E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shannon C.E. & Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  31. Stahrmühler W. 2003. Vorarbeiten zu einer “Flora von Istrien” Teil VI. Carinthia II 193/113: 579–658.Google Scholar
  32. Tommasini M. 1873. Die Flora des südlichsten Theiles von Istrien bei Promontore und Medolino. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 23(6): 169–177; 23 (7): 219–227; 219–227; 23 (8): 257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Topić J. & Šegulja N. 2000. Floristic and ecological characteristics of the southernmost part of Istria (Croatia). Acta Bot. Croat. 59(1): 179–200.Google Scholar
  34. Venhuis C., Venhuis P., Oostermeijer J.G.B. & van Tienderen P.H. 2007. Morphological systematics of Serapias L. (Orchidaceae) in southwest Europe. Pl. Syst. Evol. 265: 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vuković N. 2005. Orchids of Cape Kamenjak. Graduation Thesis, University of Zagreb. (mscr.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Hršak
    • 1
  • Slavko Brana
    • 2
  • Zorana Sedlar
    • 1
  • Ivan Pejić
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Natura HistricaRovinCroatia
  3. 3.Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biometrics, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations