Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of surfactant use and peat amendment on leaching of fungicides and nitrate from golf greens

  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil water repellency in golf putting greens may induce preferential “finger flow”, leading to enhanced leaching of surface applied agrochemicals such as fungicides and nitrate. We examined the effects of root zone composition and the use of the non-ionic surfactant Revolution on soil water repellency, soil water content distributions, infiltration rates, turf quality, and fungicide and nitrate leaching from April 2007 to April 2008. The study was made on 4-year-old experimental green seeded with creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) ‘Penn A-4’ at Landvik in southeast Norway. Eight lysimeters with two different root zone materials: (i) straight sand (1% gravel, 96% sand, 3% silt and clay, and 4 g kg−1 organic matter) (SS) and (ii) straight sand mixed with Sphagnum peat to an organic matter content of 25 g kg−1 (SP) were used in this study. Surfactant treatment reduced the spatial variability of water contents, increased infiltration rates and reduced water drop penetration times (WDPTs) by on average 99% in and just below the thatch layer. These effects were most evident for SS lysimeters. Surfactant treatment resulted on average in an 80% reduction of total fungicide leaching, presumably due to reduced preferential finger flow facilitated by decreased soil water repellency. Peat amendment reduced fungicide leaching by 90%, probably due to increased sorption of the fungicides to organic matter. Nitrate leaching was also smaller from surfactant-treated straight-sand root zones, but this effect was not significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cisar J.L., Williams K.E, Vivas H.E. & Haydu J.J. 2000. The occurrence and alleviation by surfactants of soil-water repellency on sand-based turfgrass systems. J. Hydrol. 231–232:352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union 1997. Proposal for a council directive establishing annexe VI to directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placement of plant protection products on the market. Official J. Eur. Communities C240: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 1998. Council Directive 98/83/ EC of 3 Nov. 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official J. Eur. Comm. L330: 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker L.W. & Ritsema C.J. 1994. How Water Moves in a Water Repellent Sandy Soil. 1. Potential and Actual Water Repellency. Water Resour. Res. 30: 2507–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker L.W., Ritsema C.J. & Oostindie K. 2004. Dry spots in golf courses: occurrence, amelioration and prevention. Acta Hort. 661: 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerr S.H., Shakesby R.A. & Walsh R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Sci. Rev. 51: 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx J.M.H., Dekker L.W. & Boersma O.H. 1993. Unstable Wetting Fronts in Water-Repellent Field Soils. J. Environ. Qual. 22: 109–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holen B. & Christiansen A. 2006. Handbook of analytical methods for pesticide residues. Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Bioforsk Laboratory, Ås, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis N.J. 2007. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58: 523–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostka S.J. 2000. Amelioration of water repellency in highly managed soils and the enhancement of turfgrass performance through the systematic application of surfactants. J. Hydrol. 231/232: 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostka S.J., Schuermann G. & Franklin M. 2008. Alkyl-capped block copolymer surfactants for remediation of soil water repellency and heterogeneous rootzone moisture. pp. 69–76. In: Martin C. et al. (eds), Pesticide Formulations and Delivery Systems, 27th Volume: Traditional and Non-Traditional Developments.

  • Larsbo M., Aamlid T.S., Persson L. & Jarvis N. 2008. Fungicide leaching from golf greens: Effects of root zone composition and surfactant use. J. Environ. Qual. 37: 527–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen G.H. & Lode O. 2008. Jord- og vannovervåkning i landbruket. Resultater fra overvåkning av pesticider i bekker og elver i Norge. Bioforsk Rapport 3(33): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Golf Association. 2004. Available at http://www.usga.org/turf/course_construction/green_articles/putting_green_guidelines.html (verified 6 Nov. 2007).

  • van Dam J.C., Hendrickx J.M.H., van Ommen H.C., Bannink M.H., van Genuchten M.T. & Dekker L.W. 1990. Water and solute movement in a coarse-textured water-repellent field soil. J. Hydrol. 120: 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trygve S. Aamlid.

Additional information

The use of trade names in this paper does not imply endorsement of a product.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aamlid, T.S., Larsbo, M. & Jarvis, N. Effects of surfactant use and peat amendment on leaching of fungicides and nitrate from golf greens. Biologia 64, 419–423 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0094-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0094-7

Key words

Navigation